Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Actually, this and there'd be 10 CD threads about "how Black people are all criminals and savages and keep the children safe, and it's the whites who suffer racism because of Affirmative Action, and blacks cause racism not whites..."
Probably within the hour.
And in those threads, we'd probably have posts from several regulars here talking about "Holder's people," and how they wished that one of those "animals" would try something like that against them because then they'd be sorry. Of course, they're really just wishing for an opportunity to shoot a black guy and get away with it.
The problem is that "facts" are lost to liberals, who immediately convict the guy of murder. It was self defense. The teen was beating the crap out of him, according to the only witness. Further, the defendent is recorded calling for help in the background during the 911 call.
Just another thug killed for being a thug. Move along. The media embarrasses itself by creating another "Tawana Brawley" case.
Witness: Martin attacked Zimmerman (http://www.myfoxtampabay.com/dpp/news/state/witness-martin-attacked-zimmerman-03232012 - broken link)
This is nothing like the Tawana Brawley case....Sure, they are trying to milk the race card as far as it can go...But there is a definite problem because Zimmerman admitted to killing Martin, there was a clear witness and Zimmerman hasn't been arrested. Tawana Brawley went missing for a couple days and said some white guys dragged her into the woods and raped her, no witnesses, nothing matched up... Big difference...
You mean like with OJ Simpson case? Back then they said if OJ had been white, the media would have ignored the whole thing. It seems the media went ballistic in both cases, so the argument fails big time.
And in those threads, we'd probably have posts from several regulars here talking about "Holder's people," and how they wished that one of those "animals" would try something like that against them because then they'd be sorry. Of course, they're really just wishing for an opportunity to shoot a black guy and get away with it.
Pretty much. And of course it would be proof and evidence why they have a "real reason" to hate "the blacks" because they are "violent and a bunch of welfare queens" because white people never ever use guns or apply for welfare.
I think every time a Black person does something bad, 100 racists are born and 1,000 racists grasp onto the individual's actions as a example of what all black people--yep, every single last one do them--do, to justify their prejudice even more.
What has you so emotional about this? Should I guess that the NRA is worried about the stand your ground law, so they're having the usual right wing blogs/commentators start digging up dirt about the kid?
What does his picture matter? He's a 17 year old who went in his own neighborhood to get a candy bar and some idiot wannabe cop defied 911 instructions and confronted and then shot him. It doesn't matter what his picture looked like.
Personally, other than this picture and the one someone posted of him in shorts I haven't seen a picture of him. The picture doesn't matter. The facts do.
The "stand your ground" law is not the issue here since it does not apply. Zimmerman lost that defense the second he stepped out of the safety of his truck to pursue the kid.
It may be argued that the law may apply since it is now being reported that Zimmerman was attached by the kid and broke his nose according to a witness.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.