Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well did the EMS examine him on the scene? If so there would be a record of his "injuries". Apparently they were not that bad. I don't dispute he probably got socked in the nose. If I had a strange guy following me at night and asking me what I am doing here, I'd sock him too.
Really? Someone in the neighborhood asks what youre doing and youre just going to punch him? Don't be surprised when that person you punched A. presses charges b. knocks you out. c. stabs/shoots you.
This whole case seems to be a big mess. A lot of pieces don't line up right and unfortunately we only have one, possibly two, people's word on what happened. I can't see Zimmerman being proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
If I lived in a community where I knew everyone and someone seemed out of place, I think I have every right to ask if they need help or whats going on without being assaulted. I can ask whatever I want, its up to that person how they respond. And their response will determine my set of actions.
There doesn't need to be a medical report, and it doesn't make an iota of difference whether Zimmerman was profiling Martin. There is an eyewitness who saw Zimmerman on his back in the grass screaming for help while Martin was on top of him administering a beating. Self defense - end of story.
That's the problem with jumping on a bandwagon while the wheels are still spinning, you don't know where it's headed and it might even collide with the truth.
Self defense my foot. Why was there such need for it to begin with?
There doesn't need to be a medical report, and it doesn't make an iota of difference whether Zimmerman was profiling Martin. There is an eyewitness who saw Zimmerman on his back in the grass screaming for help while Martin was on top of him administering a beating. Self defense - end of story.
That's the problem with jumping on a bandwagon while the wheels are still spinning, you don't know where it's headed and it might even collide with the truth.
No one saw how the fight began. Tables could have turned. Seems the fat 28 year old with no job that lived at home with momma tried to pick a fight on a small black teen and ended up getting his ass whooped, cried for help then shot the kid.
And someone like you who is NOT a doctor and didn't see the injuries thinks they are credible. Could this get anymore looney?!
What do I claim about his injuries? Why do you persist in interjecting yourself into conversations that have nothing to do with you? You're having enough of a hard time supporting your own claims.
-Provide proof that an eye witness saw Trayvon jump Zimmerman as he was retreating ( I see you backed out of this argument).
-Provide evidence that I stated that the police report was false. Determining facts from an "insinuation" requires you to be telepathic. Are you?
Just give it up already. You insinuated the report was false because it is based on Zimmerman's accounts. Do you honestly think people are that stupid? You said it, you made the claim, now OWN it! BTW, I already provided the evidence.. Here it is again in case you didn't catch it the first time:
Quote:
OMG...it's like arguing with a child!
The police report= Zimmerman's statement.
Do we now take a suspect's statements as truth?
Post #147
Have a nice day!!!!!!!!!! LMAO!
What does that say? What are you insinuating there? PWNED!
I'd be suspicious if a strange kid was outside my house that late. The left wants everybody to lock their doors, hide, and pray the bad man goes away.
It doesn't work like that. Its ok to be sispicious, especially with all the stuff going on these days.
I'd be extra suspicious if I saw a black kid on my block, no blacks near my neighbohood for whatever reason(property taxes maybe) but every break in we've had the last few years have been black kids.
It is what it is and that's how I've been conditioned.
If you think I'm going to risk my family's safety just to be nice you're stupid.
I'd expect to be treated the same way if I was caught in their hood, but I know I'd act civil when confronted.
What do I claim about his injuries? Why do you persist in interjecting yourself into conversations that have nothing to do with you? You're having enough of a hard time supporting your own claims.
You are too much baby doll. You are way over the top of a spin meister. Have fun with your dishonest lifestyle...
His responsibility lies in engaging in the fight.
I am not saying he is the person who is wrong here.
I am not saying Zimmerman is the person who is right.
I am not saying Zimmerman bears no responsibility.
I am not saying Zimmerman shouldn't be investigated by the police and have some consequence dealt upon him.
All I am saying is that Trayvon was not a 100% innocent victim.
That is all I am saying, despite your efforts to twist it into my saying something else.
But where's the drama in that, right?
My only problem with your stance is that, outside of Zimmerman and Trayvon, we don't know how the fight started. If Trayvon started the fight, then I agree that he is culpable in what transpired. However, if Zimmerman started the fight, Trayvon was within his rights to defend himself.
Since we don't know which way this went, how is it possible to assign blame to Trayvon? Why not just withhold blame entirely?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
While your claim is laughable, at least you admit that it is a guess. So in other words, not facts and/or reliable. Thanks.
