Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-04-2012, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,350,388 times
Reputation: 4212

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix C View Post
Have never heard of a rubber failing. What percentage is it?

Unlike a number of my acquaintances who did not want to use one because you know "it doesn't feel the same" and become instant fathers. Surprise! It is purely for bragging rights. I mean once you break up and she starts up with a new guy...you always know you let go inside.

Does not help as GFs always go for the "I want you to come inside me" line when they are in their O-zone. What guy can resist?

Almost forgot and I suspect this is true of the younger crowd in wishing to emulate the antics as seen on internet porn. "Whose your Daddy!" became quite popular after Boogie Nights. I can imagine what the readily available hardcore stuff has done.
I haven't used a condom in 16 years but in the past I had many break. When she said I do I said goodbye to condoms. What percentage? Maybe 15-20% or so.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-04-2012, 03:05 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
7,085 posts, read 12,059,627 times
Reputation: 4125
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
How many liberals can we get to make this comment on one forum? Is this like a bandwagon comment? Do you guys all read the same magazine? Newsletter?

I don't think I can bend my brain down far enough to even grasp where these types of comments come from. You folks really do harbor a mental dark space that the rest of us fortunately do not not have.
Wow, you must have a really big ego that you put out there that people have a newsletter with a large subscriber base to it dedicated to this.

This is a psychological projection that has been well documented since Sigmund Freud's day. The people most vehemently opposed to others having sex at all outside of just procreation are the ones not getting enough themselves. Making everyone else celibate while they are not celibate by choice. It's just so obvious that anyone who has been near a psych 101 class, or has experience reading social cues, can see it plain as day. It's so blatantly obvious it can even be seen in a text medium.

Look at the thread to see how many people are going crazy about even the attempt to make a viable male birth control option, it's a great example.

Just like the biggest anti-gay crusaders are usually closeted basket cases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2012, 03:08 PM
 
4,042 posts, read 3,530,846 times
Reputation: 1968
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Or you could just keep your dick in your pants......or at a minimum keep it covered....if you don't intend to pro-create.
Or...as bible says, a man can "spill his seed on the ground." (bible says that doing this is better than a man "defiling himself with a woman)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2012, 03:35 PM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,208,953 times
Reputation: 3411
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
I didn't realize this was the Religion Forum that i've been posting in all along!

The fact of the matter is, you conflated your understanding of what people think birth control should entail with what people on this forum have actually said.

I'll be glad to witness as many comments as you can dig up of poster's commenting that birth control is "evil" and shouldn't be used.

I don't believe they exist.
No--I posted a link to a thread where the OP said exactly what I stated, and I found it in about 30 seconds. If I remember correctly, that thread started in POC (I remember it, because it's crazy, even for this board), and got moved to the religious forum. The OP of the post I linked to and a couple of other people were starting threads like this daily on POC for awhile. You'll find plenty of others if you look--I gave you proof--you just can't seem to admit it when you're really wrong. Stop acting like a child.

For the record, I never said everyone here has that viewpoint, but I was surprised by the number that do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2012, 03:41 PM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,208,953 times
Reputation: 3411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Go look at your state budget for food stamps, rent assistance, school lunch assistance and so on and so forth. That's not even touching the costs involved if the kid isn't raised correctly and causes criminal trouble, theft, shootings, has kids of thier own, requires incarceration and what not.

Any good fiscal conservative or dutch farmer knows that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

If you don't believe me, stop getting oil changes and report back on the cost savings in a couple years.
This . I'll gladly pay for someone's birth control if the alternative is my tax dollars supporting the kid they can't afford until it's grown (which is exactly what will happen unless we eliminate every social program in the country, and that's NOT going to happen). You're right--any REAL fiscal conservative would get this in a heartbeat. They seem to be in short supply on this board.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2012, 03:58 PM
 
2,729 posts, read 5,373,305 times
Reputation: 1785
Quote:
Originally Posted by subsound View Post
Wow, you must have a really big ego that you put out there that people have a newsletter with a large subscriber base to it dedicated to this.

This is a psychological projection that has been well documented since Sigmund Freud's day. The people most vehemently opposed to others having sex at all outside of just procreation are the ones not getting enough themselves. Making everyone else celibate while they are not celibate by choice. It's just so obvious that anyone who has been near a psych 101 class, or has experience reading social cues, can see it plain as day. It's so blatantly obvious it can even be seen in a text medium.

Look at the thread to see how many people are going crazy about even the attempt to make a viable male birth control option, it's a great example.

Just like the biggest anti-gay crusaders are usually closeted basket cases.
Could you please repeat this in English, because from what little I can understand, it sounds like you honestly believe some insane theory about why people think sex should be had responsibly.


Here's the bottom line: If you're not man enough to accept ALL the consequences of having sex - and there are many - you should NOT be having sex. What is so hard to understand about that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2012, 04:09 PM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,158,177 times
Reputation: 5941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big George View Post
Could you please repeat this in English, because from what little I can understand, it sounds like you honestly believe some insane theory about why people think sex should be had responsibly.


Here's the bottom line: If you're not man enough to accept ALL the consequences of having sex - and there are many - you should NOT be having sex. What is so hard to understand about that?
Fine. How do you intend to change human nature?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2012, 04:19 PM
 
9,879 posts, read 8,022,870 times
Reputation: 2521
Quote:
Originally Posted by ray1945 View Post
Exactly. This procedure is a perfect example exercising "basic personal responsibility." Encourage all teenage boys to get it and you'd put a huge dent in teen pregnancies. Heck, make it free for all 13 year old boys...
It's odd pharm co's aren't really
thrilled about this. Wonder why?

"pharmaceutical companies aren’t champing at the bit to roll out RISUG for American customers – a single injection lasting for years or even decades would not be very profitable."

"Margaret Sanger and Katharine McCormick met similar obstacles when it came to R&D for the birth control pill in the 1950s – pharmaceutical companies didn’t think women would be interested in such a technology, so Sanger tapped the talents of scientists and the private fortune of McCormick in order to force the development of the “magic pill” she dreamed of."

Expanding Options for Male Contraception | Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona | Blog
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2012, 04:25 PM
 
2,729 posts, read 5,373,305 times
Reputation: 1785
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! View Post
Fine. How do you intend to change human nature?
When you know you have no point, bring up some completely irrelevant inane point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2012, 04:31 PM
 
9,879 posts, read 8,022,870 times
Reputation: 2521
Quote:
Originally Posted by subsound View Post

This is a psychological projection that has been well documented since Sigmund Freud's day. The people most vehemently opposed to others having sex at all outside of just procreation are the ones not getting enough themselves.

Just like the biggest anti-gay crusaders are usually closeted basket cases.
Freud was a Nut.
I thought it was the ones who talked about having sex all the time were
the ones who actually weren't getting any

But this news is very exciting. I'm hoping it's as popular as the
invention of the TV
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top