Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He was an average student with so so grades but had benefactors in high places who wanted him to be a poster child. That and he had some potentially embarrassing or even potentially scandalous information on his college records. So they have to be kept secret.
His articles are not released nor can you get them to review. Why is that?
There is nothing that was ever published in any Harvard Law Review that "has not been released." All are public record.
As to the OP... if anybody genuinely believes that woman knew what she was talking about, they're nuts. She was garbling a Birther talking point that is pure fabrication.
He has not spent a penny to prevent the release of his transcripts.
He was an average student with so so grades but had benefactors in high places who wanted him to be a poster child. That and he had some potentially embarrassing or even potentially scandalous information on his college records. So they have to be kept secret.
He was an average student with so so grades but had benefactors in high places who wanted him to be a poster child. That and he had some potentially embarrassing or even potentially scandalous information on his college records. So they have to be kept secret.
Honestly, I think the President - whoever it is - has so few islands of privacy that he likely fiercely defends those bits he can keep as his own. It's only human nature. In this case, "fiercely defending" consists of not giving permission to release records.
So much for being the most transparent administration ever.
There is nothing that was ever published in any Harvard Law Review that "has not been released." All are public record.
As to the OP... if anybody genuinely believes that woman knew what she was talking about, they're nuts. She was garbling a Birther talking point that is pure fabrication.
He has not spent a penny to prevent the release of his transcripts.
Who would he even pay other than attorneys? And $200,000 in attorney fees would be in response to some legal action which would be public record also.
Ok, so his grades may have sucked, who cares. It is unlikely that is the case since he graduated *** Laude.
1960 is much different than 2012, just ask Bill Clinton.
Well if his grades sucked (and I'm not alleging they did) that would create significant dissonance with the claim by some that the man is utterly brilliant. If he's not as smart as he and his sycophants claim he is then what else do we think we know about him that may be untrue?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
