The General Welfare Clause and forms of unemployment insurance. (minimum wage, party, states)

[danielpalos]

I am of the opinion, that complying with at-will employment doctrine, via forms of at-will unemployment, is a much better promotion and provision of the general Welfare clause, than providing for specific forms of the general Welfare, via forms of unemployment compensation. This assumes that there is no barrier to full compliance with at-will doctrine from either party.

Such a public policy scheme would benefit, more generally, the general Welfare of the populace of the several states, of the United States.

Within the context of a hypothetical at-will unemployment insurance form of public policy. What would lowering barriers to entry entail for the private sector?

With complementary forms of private unemployment insurance, if a potential consumer, of forms of unemployment insurance products has access to a guaranteed income; what kinds of complementary insurance products could the private sector provide, based on consumers with access to that income?

I am under the impression, that if I, as a consumer of forms of unemployment insurance with access to at-will forms of unemployment compensation; I would want to be able to complement potential unemployment wages to a greater or lessor degree, with private forms of insurance.

If based on the current minimum wage, what kinds of rates would I be able to obtain, if I had a guaranteed access to that level of (minimum) wage, regardless of private sector employment status (due to at-will doctrine)?