Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-09-2013, 09:47 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,215,209 times
Reputation: 18824

Advertisements

I see no harm in it. Their community...their business. It ain't gonna help them on the field.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-09-2013, 09:53 PM
 
3,448 posts, read 3,133,725 times
Reputation: 478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic 2.0 View Post
Round and round we go.




The bold is a loophole; I'm sure many Satanists would agree. So again, "Satan, keep us safe." Welcome or no?
Nice try- from original

Originally Posted by stargazzer
Good question,

sa·tan·ic *(s-tnk, s-) or sa·tan·i·cal (--kl)
adj.
1. Relating to or suggestive of Satan or evil.
2. Profoundly cruel or evil; fiendish.

Christianity is all about virtue, charity, fortitude, faith and so on.

V reply
The bold is a loophole; I'm sure many Satanists would agree. So again, "Satan, keep us safe." Welcome or no? ( The bold highlighted from above was "Satan or Evil.


Stargazzer reply

Sa·tan *(stn)
n.
The profoundly evil adversary of God and >humanity, often identified with the leader of the fallen angels; the Devil.



escape

a : to get away (as by flight) <escaped from prison>
b : to issue from confinement <gas is escaping>
c of a plant : to run wild from cultivation


loop·hole *(lphl)
n.
1. A way of escaping a difficulty, especially an omission or ambiguity in the wording of a contract or law that provides a means of evading compliance.
2. A small hole or slit in a wall, especially one through which small arms may be fired.


good luck with that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2013, 10:02 PM
 
5,261 posts, read 4,157,597 times
Reputation: 2264
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
That would be something designated by the school which the courts likely wouldn't allow.
(Chuckling)

Yes, indeed it would be. Kind of like public school students being precluded from testifying at school events and the courts eventually upholding the right of schools to regulate what students may say while they are at school or at school events.

If you don't have the sense to say it, I will: It's time for you to call it a night.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2013, 10:07 PM
 
5,261 posts, read 4,157,597 times
Reputation: 2264
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
I see no harm in it. Their community...their business. It ain't gonna help them on the field.
The last place in the world we need this kind of nonsense to be is in our public schools. If you want that nonsense, go to religious schools. We're not talking about studying a religion, we're talking about juveniles testifying to a particular religion. It has no more place in public schools or at public school events than someone standing up to testify to the virtues of Apple computers before the big game. Save it for your own time and stop wasting everyone else's with this garbage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2013, 10:15 PM
 
5,190 posts, read 4,840,372 times
Reputation: 1115
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
Cheerleaders in a Texas town will be allowed to include Bible and religious messages on signs at sporting events after receiving a temporary restraining order against a high school’s ban.
Why would they even want Biblical passages anyway?- I thought cheerleaders were a form of sexy dancer , and that must be against the message of Christianity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2013, 10:15 PM
 
3,448 posts, read 3,133,725 times
Reputation: 478
The Christian Cheerleaders should be given 'special consideration because the belief has nothing to do with anything but perseverance and virtue. If this is the source of their spirited enthusiasm, denying it place's a restriction on their 'freedom to express the underlining momentum allowing for expression, in the fullness of their 'duty for the team.

The belief is non aggressive in its very nature, and holds in occasion of un-provoked attack to not only turn the other cheek, but to put back and restore any damage to the attacker, the story with put the chopped off ear back on.

So it sounds like the law in this whole argument, is simply going one step at a time...to get the howling society calmed down with some of the normal realities of life, no doubt about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 04:22 AM
 
Location: TX
6,486 posts, read 6,391,422 times
Reputation: 2628
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
If you can find a situation where one is allowed and not the other I will be right there condemning that.
I would hope so. But of course, there is a much simpler solution to all this: Let NO religion take the high ground EVER. Let them all be represented on the sidelines, apart from the school function itself!

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
There is no right to be representing equally in your speech. Only in a right to express it.
The standard we're forced to uphold due to the U.S. Constitution should not be our highest aspiration, I submit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic 2.0 View Post
"Satan, keep us safe." Welcome or no?
Quote:
Originally Posted by stargazzer View Post
Nice try-

Sa·tan *(stn)
n.
The profoundly evil adversary of God and >humanity, often identified with the leader of the fallen angels; the Devil.

good luck with that
No luck needed. Someone earlier said they let a Muslim say a prayer for their town's football game (and their religion says to kill infidels, as I'm sure you've heard). So what's the difference, really? So long as the prayer is "Satan, keep us safe".

Really, if you wanted to REALLY hold true to the Constitution, expression of your religious beliefs should mean exactly that. Muslims should be able to say "Keep us safe, except for the infidels" and Satanists should be able to say "Let us enjoy our sins" or what have you. THAT won't happen because people WILL be offended, and then the Christians would no longer be able to claim they're being denied their freedom of speech because someone else was offended by it. Hmmmm.

Or we could make football about football. Which sounds crazier to you?

Last edited by Vic 2.0; 05-10-2013 at 04:33 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 04:57 AM
 
Location: Deep Dirty South
5,189 posts, read 5,337,550 times
Reputation: 3863
Whoo-hoo! Go Imaginary Sky Beings!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 05:06 AM
 
Location: The Beautiful Pocono Mountains
5,450 posts, read 8,764,557 times
Reputation: 3002
Well, my opinion is that if they are allowed to post quotes from any other book, then the bible should not be left out if that's what they want.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 05:50 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,214,925 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by stargazzer View Post
The Christian Cheerleaders should be given 'special consideration because the belief has nothing to do with anything but perseverance and virtue. If this is the source of their spirited enthusiasm, denying it place's a restriction on their 'freedom to express the underlining momentum allowing for expression, in the fullness of their 'duty for the team.

The belief is non aggressive in its very nature, and holds in occasion of un-provoked attack to not only turn the other cheek, but to put back and restore any damage to the attacker, the story with put the chopped off ear back on.

So it sounds like the law in this whole argument, is simply going one step at a time...to get the howling society calmed down with some of the normal realities of life, no doubt about it.
NO religion should have "special consideration".
Why can't the Buddhists have "special consideration"? Buddhists are more peaceful than christians. Buddhists are more virtuous than christians.
Who gets to decide which religions are deserving of "special consideration"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top