Quote:
Originally Posted by The Homogenizer
Sure, but I'd like to know what you think it is because you're saying something that I don't understand. The Supreme Court ruled in Flemming v Nestor that you have no right to that money, so when you say that you paid into Social Security, it really doesn't matter that you paid into it. As soon as you pay the money, it's no longer yours.
|
Uh, that's how insurance works. Try get a refund on your car insurance payments.
Let us know how that works out.
Not reimbursing...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_windwalker
LMAO... First of all, there was nowhere near $800,000 (more like $8.57), and second, the wife already got to it..... And spent it...
|
Try harder next time.
Digging...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALackOfCreativity
I bolded your I there because it (taken with your post as a whole) illustrates an important issue and source of confusion. Social security is not merely a scheme for redistributing cash from one generation to another but from people who made more money before they retired to people who made less.
|
But that isn't true at all. What is the minimum monthly Social Security check? $1.
Social Security will not pay less than $1 per month in benefits.
There are people who got their 40 quarters of credit and get $1 per month in benefits.
I know of someone who gets $80/month. So you wanna explain how "wealth" is being redistributed?
There is no flat minimum benefit for Social Security. Not only that, but there is no relationship between the amount of money you paid in, and the amount of your benefit. Your benefit is determined by a formula that is based on your average monthly wages, not your average monthly FICA payments.
As of today, in order to get credit for 1 quarter, you must earn $1,300 over calendar quarter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALackOfCreativity
The amounts that people get out do not scale equivalently with what they put in.
|
Yeah? So what? Who cares? It's an
insurance plan.
Somebody buys a car, makes their first $156 insurance payment and then three days later totals a $60,000 SUV, a $45,000 Honda, does $17,000 in miscellaneous property damage, and $575,000 in hospital/medical bills.
Yeah? And? Aren't you gong to throw an hissy fit because that person "
didn't pay enough?"
Aren't you going to scream and rant because wealth is being "
redistributed" to cover the pay-out on the insurance claim?
No? Why not?
If you drank the Kool-Aid and took the Blue Pill believing Social Security was the Rolls Royce of Money Market/Hedge Fund/Pension Plan/Retirement Accounts, that's just too bad.
42 USC § 402 - Old-age and survivors
insurance benefit payments
(a)
Old-age insurance benefits Every individual who—
(1) is a
fully insured individual (as defined in section
414 (a) of this title),
(2) has attained age 62, and
(3) has filed application for old-age
insurance benefits or was entitled to disability
insurance benefits for the month preceding the month in which he attained retirement age (as defined in section
416 (l) of this title), shall be entitled to an old-age
insurance benefit for each month, beginning with—
That's the law.
Who here does not understand the meaning of the word
insurance?
If you don't like the law, change it. That's why there's "elections."
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALackOfCreativity
Further, you do not have to put in a full career to be eligible. Correct me if I have the exact number wrong, but I believe about 10 years is the requirement for full benefits.
|
Sure, 40 quarters or 10 years, same thing, but as I explained, you have to earn a minimum amount of money during each quarter. I stress again --- earn -- not pay in -- the amount of money you pay in is irrelevant.
That was $250 in earnings per quarter in 1978. Why? Because the law changed in 1977. The amount goes up every year. In 2013, you will need to
earn $1,170 in a calendar quarter to get credit for the quarter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALackOfCreativity
You personally may very well have paid more money in payroll taxes than the expected value of your benefits, but, your generation as a whole paid much less.
|
The Silent Generation got slammed with a 520% FICA tax increase. The $2.6 TRILLION in the OASDI Trust Fund? You can thank the Silent Generation for putting most of that money there.
The Boomer Generation took a hit with a 71% FICA tax increase. Again, that $2.6 TRILLION in the OASDI Trust Fund? The Boomers put the other half of that money there.
What have Generation X-Box and Generation Y-Work contributed to the Trust Fund?
Uh, we're still waiting for them to contribute.
Thus far, every generation got hit with a FICA payroll tax increase,
except Generation X-Box and Generation Y-Work. Their day is coming......soon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALackOfCreativity
Social security is a pay-as-you-go government redistribution program, not a proper pension program.
|
Figure that out all by yourself, did you? It would have been easier just to go read the law....
42 USC § 402 - Old-age and survivors
insurance benefit payments
(a)
Old-age insurance benefits Every individual who—
(1) is a
fully insured individual (as defined in section
414 (a) of this title),
(2) has attained age 62, and
(3) has filed application for old-age
insurance benefits or was entitled to disability
insurance benefits for the month preceding the month in which he attained retirement age (as defined in section
416 (l) of this title), shall be entitled to an old-age
insurance benefit for each month, beginning with—
.....note that the words "
pension" and "
plan" and "
savings" and "
account" are not in the law.
Neither are the words "
personal" or "
private."
You know your tax dollars are used to publish Tomes of Knowledge and maintain web-sites with the same knowledge. You all should go check it out once in a Blue Moon. It'd be worth your while.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALackOfCreativity
If you remember back to Bush's failed attempt to implement individual accounts, that was all about trying to transform social security from what it is into a real pension plan.
|
That was stupid, and if you all fall for that, then I laugh in your general direction.
Social Security is an insurance program. If they want to privatize an insurance program, I'm all for that, but don't let them engage in a massive redirection of cash Capital into into the Market.
You'll be sorry. I guarantee it.
Portending...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packard fan
I paid into SS. ALL people who pay taxes in the US pay into SS.
|
Well, no, actually all people who work pay FICA taxes. There are people who do not pay FICA taxes. If I would be a Wall Street Wizardâ„¢ then I would not be paying FICA taxes. All I would ever do is buy and sell stocks now and again for cash.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packard fan
Uh; I'm in my late 40's and my SS benefits won't come in till I'm about 68 or so. If they get cut off; expect us "old people" to raise hell big time cause WE paid into SS.
|
Raise hell all you want, but you cannot squeeze blood from a turnip.
Sagely...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by mateo45
Heck, when a Harvard-educated black guy can't even assume the job of POTUS without a bunch of yahoos ragging him for being an "uppity muslim Kenyan", then what chance does the average 'minority' have?
|
That would depend on their character. If they are an aggrandizing narcissistic lying sack of runny excrement (like Obama) then I will treat them like the scum they are. Otherwise we'd probably have lunch at Enzo's in Over-the-Rhine.
I am not at all impressed by Ivy League graduates. In fact, the "you-Harvard" crowd has done nothing but destroy your country for the last 70 years.
If it would be up to me, I'd have all Ivy Leaguers in government taken out and shot, and then establish a 77-year ban on hiring anyone who even saw an Ivy League college, even if it was just pictures in a newspaper or book.
Big Ten rules...
Mircea