Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-17-2012, 06:02 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,195 posts, read 19,238,037 times
Reputation: 14920

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
Released the day after the 2nd Debate:

Election 2012 Likely Voters Trial Heat: Obama vs. Romney


10/10-16/2012

Obama Romney
45% 51%
I'll bet a lot of people were pissed that got woke up to get polled last night after the debate.

That's the only way they could have it out today. Didn't happen. But the statement that it did is worthy of a Romney debate lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-17-2012, 06:05 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,791,415 times
Reputation: 4174
The debate didn't start until 9:00PM Eastern.

Where does it say any polling was done after that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 06:32 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,374,090 times
Reputation: 7990
Most if not all of this polling was pre-debate. I heard Michael Barone say today that Gallup tends to be volatile when the switch from registered to likely voters, because of the way that they define 'likely voter.' So take this number with a grain of salt. Anyway I figure that Romney is up by a point or two or three, and we're in the early stage of an exciting sprint finish. I see Mitt Romney as Tirunesh Dibaba.


Tirunesh Dibaba The 22 Years Old Destroyer !! - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 07:09 PM
 
8,263 posts, read 12,204,955 times
Reputation: 4801
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
I no longer trust Gallup since Obama used his DOJ to sue them and influence their polling.
Heh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 08:17 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,294,722 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
I'll bet a lot of people were pissed that got woke up to get polled last night after the debate.

That's the only way they could have it out today. Didn't happen. But the statement that it did is worthy of a Romney debate lie.
I heard a young mother of 4 today talking about those Gallup people calling her about 9:45 to invite her to take part in the debate last night. She went through all kinds of checking up on her etc and was picked by them to take part. Of course, she wasn't happy that her question didn't get asked but seemed to have been very happy to take part. She was one of those people who still say they aren't decided who gets their votes and she still isn't. I thought that was pretty late to be calling over a week before the debate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 10:34 PM
 
24,428 posts, read 23,088,846 times
Reputation: 15033
David Letterman had a sour constipated expression on his face and was in a cranky anti Romney mood tonite. Maybe hiring Obama as a sidekick might cheer him up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2012, 07:12 AM
 
Location: Orlando
8,276 posts, read 12,867,178 times
Reputation: 4142
ABC poll favors Obama

Polls aren't real reliable if you didn't guess yet... btw... gallup has a posted error rate of 3-4% which means it can be 47 romney - 49 Obama or did you want to omit that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2012, 07:43 AM
 
78,477 posts, read 60,666,856 times
Reputation: 49796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
10/10 through 10/16 Um, today is 10/17, the day after the debate. Thats a poll before it, and a lot of people have discounted the Gallup poll because many expected large swings in the polls for Romney in Florida and other states. Gallup is an outlier on Ohio right now.

But as I've always said, polls, don't mean squat on 11/6, you have to look at all of them, throw out the highest, and throw out the lowest, look for the ones in the middle, usually thats kind of where the truth is.

But I do find it funny that you're saying this is the day after the debate, we won't see a debate shift, if there is one, until probably early next week, Friday at the earliest.
That was way too intelligent and balanced of a post for this forum.

Besides, I don't ever give a crud about the overall %'s....show me what FL, OH etc. are looking like. Who cares if Obama or Romney picked up votes in Texas or California etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2012, 08:23 AM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,406,129 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
That was way too intelligent and balanced of a post for this forum.

Besides, I don't ever give a crud about the overall %'s....show me what FL, OH etc. are looking like. Who cares if Obama or Romney picked up votes in Texas or California etc.

I don't even like it when Gallup lumped all statistics together for the 12 battleground states. Its a very different demographic in Iowa then in Florida. You've got to look at state by state numbers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2012, 09:07 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,296,330 times
Reputation: 3826
If Romney is up 4 or 5 percent on election day, statistically it will be near impossible for Obama to win the electoral college, just based on the distribution of the voters across all states.

I fully expect the Bradley effect to take out about 5% of the voters. A lot of people are paranoid about losing their jobs in this economy and the politically correct atmosphere may compel them to state to pollsters that they support a black man. I think it was there in 2008 also but the reverse Bradley effect as a one-time thing was also in effect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top