Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-27-2012, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisFromChicago View Post
"greatest" or "worst" is of course subjective to some extent. The "meta" review of Lincoln shows public, historian, and popular opinion that Lincoln is the best president in History. Believing otherwise is fine, just that most people disagree with you.
I understand. Popular opinion has been shaped by the history books, and those who win wars get to write the history books so it's no surprise that Lincoln is the good guy and Davis is the bad guy. Do you think Washington and Jefferson would be on Mt Rushmore if the US had lost the Revolutionary war? No way.

Actually, "greatest" or "worst" is totally subjective. Everyone has a different measuring stick.

BTW, the majority of the people and scientists once thought the world was flat.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-27-2012, 02:21 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,806,382 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
Are the historical statements and references he uses wrong?
No, but it wasn't Lincoln's choice. He was dealing with a disaster that had been merely postponed for (nearly) a century. To villify him for that reason is utter stupidity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2012, 02:21 PM
 
13,053 posts, read 12,946,110 times
Reputation: 2618
Quote:
Originally Posted by ndfmnlf View Post
True. Ever since Lincoln emancipated the slaves, this country has gone downhill. Time to take the country back.

Emancipation of the slaves had nothing to do with it. It was a political move to gain support and moralize a movement to hide the fact that he was violating many aspects of constitutional authority. In his own words, Lincoln admitted that if he could have salvaged the union without releasing the slaves, he would have. Anyone who thinks Lincoln freed the slaves out of a gesture of humanity is an ignorant fool. Heck, my neighbor is a hard focused black movement supporter and even he knows the history of Lincoln was a load of garbage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2012, 02:22 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
2,072 posts, read 1,755,430 times
Reputation: 437
Quote:
Originally Posted by reconmark View Post
Pray tell, what country would that be??
CSA
Quote:
Originally Posted by reconmark View Post
Sort of like southerners who bought and sold people, broke families apart for profit, sexually abused the men, women and children they "owned".
Sort of like the Southerners who demanded that the expanding West be slave owning territories, that escaped slaves in free states be returned to forced servitude for life.


In the weeks and months after war broke out on April 12 at Fort Sumter, Southern generals learned they could get useful information about Union deployments and troop strength simply by reading the newspaper.[16] General George McClellan, commander of the Union army, met with editors and reporters to find a way to control the flow of information that was helping the enemy. On August 2, McClellan and the newspaper representatives signed guidelines governing news coverage. The guidelines were to go to "editors of all newspapers in the loyal States and District of Columbia."[17] The guidelines said:

1st. That all such editors be requested to refrain from publishing, either as editorial, or as correspondence of any description, or from any point, any matter that may furnish aid and comfort to the enemy.

2nd. That they be also requested and earnestly solicited to signify to their correspondent here and elsewhere their approval of the foregoing suggestion, and to comply with it in spirit and letter.

Also, resolved. That the government be respectfully requested to afford to the representatives of the press facilities for obtaining and immediately transmitting all information suitable for publication, particularly touching engagements with the enemy.[18]
Too bad you know nothing about military intelligence.


He may have been, he may not have been. He did not let these "supposed" views deter him from doing what was legally and morally the correct thing to do.


Sorry he needed no justification to whip a bunch of ignorant traitors back into line, when they decided to attempt to overthrow the authority of the Federal government because they could not part with their human meal tickets, they got what they deserved.
The Confederate flag NEVER flew over a slave ship on the other hand the US flag did fly over MANY slave ships and slavery started in the north.Slavery was peacefully ended everywhere else except the US and it would have happened here as well.I don't care what Gen. McClellan did the first amendment protects free speech Lincoln and his thugs destroyed the constitution and its only continued to be destroyed with damn near every president since then.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mancat100 View Post
So who am I to believe? The works of academically-vetted, well-respected historians or revisionist-history-in-service-to-a-far-right-ideology? Tough choice.
Nothing is revisionist. Read Lincoln's own speeches. Its right there for you to read and study for yourself. Most people are just to lazy or incompetent to do so. They like to believe the lies they have been fed all of their lives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2012, 02:23 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,032,019 times
Reputation: 15038
I suspect that had Lincoln not been the kind of man that he was and had followed in the footsteps of histories other illustrious victors over rebells Jefferson Davis and his cohorts wouldn't have statues and other public buildings named after them having been completely decimated and written out of history all together... frankly from my perspective the country has been worse off as a result of his beneficence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2012, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,806,382 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
Emancipation of the slaves had nothing to do with it.
It had EVERYTHING to do with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2012, 02:24 PM
 
13,053 posts, read 12,946,110 times
Reputation: 2618
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
No, but it wasn't Lincoln's choice. He was dealing with a disaster that had been merely postponed for (nearly) a century. To villify him for that reason is utter stupidity.

Wow...

Denial? Really? So you take all of the historical facts and then, in order to deny his own words, his own statements and actions, you concoct some speculative excuse of why he had to do what he did?

Stupid? You really are trying to argue a position of what is stupidity?

I can think of no better servant than what you have displayed. /boggle
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2012, 02:25 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
2,072 posts, read 1,755,430 times
Reputation: 437
As usual everyone wants to argue with the article but not look up the facts he presents. Typical of people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2012, 02:25 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,806,382 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by RebelYell14 View Post
CSA
Unconstitutional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2012, 02:26 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
2,072 posts, read 1,755,430 times
Reputation: 437
According to you. Not the Constitution but you wouldn't know that as you just take bits and pieces here and there and say HA! Told ya so!. I do wonder if the British see the US as unconstitutional seeing how they seceded and all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top