Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-19-2012, 06:20 PM
 
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
14,848 posts, read 8,210,859 times
Reputation: 4590

Advertisements

As always, the truth is somewhere in the middle.


Both are right on different points. Obviously we don't want crazy people getting guns, and we certainly do need to do something about crazy people getting guns. But we also do not want to disarm the people. Disarming the people has not been proven to do any good.



The state where it is easiest to buy a gun, is Vermont. Yet, Vermont has almost the lowest murder rate in the entire country.


There is no truth to the idea that guns cause crime. Neither murders, and especially not violent crime.

But, there are things that can be done. I think we should both eliminate gun-free zones, as well as do a better job in preventing the mentally ill from getting these guns.



It reminds me of the Chris Rock song... "No Sex in the Champagne Room".


Chris Rock - No Sex ft. Shadow - YouTube


There is a line where he says... "Don't go to parties with metal detectors.... Sure it feels safe on the inside... But what about all those people outside with guns? They know you ain't got one."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-19-2012, 06:21 PM
 
32,516 posts, read 37,183,567 times
Reputation: 32581
Roy's handy (and lucrative) links, also known as: "Road to the White House - 2016 - How the Democrats Won"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 06:40 PM
 
3,598 posts, read 4,949,986 times
Reputation: 3169
I have no possible idea how someone could say that Pratt destroyed Piers in that clip. More like the other way around.

Oh wait, I forgot this is backwards world. Why did conservatives lose the election again? Hmmmm.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 06:42 PM
 
3,598 posts, read 4,949,986 times
Reputation: 3169
Quote:
Originally Posted by fibonacci View Post
WHy have any laws then?

Why have laws against speeding if only criminals will speed?

Duh....of course we pass laws knowing full well that some people will break them. It's called a civilized society.

"If we ban guns, then only criminals will have guns".......gee thanks, for basically defining the term "illegal" for us.

We might as well do away with laws against rape and abduction then "if only criminals" will do that then.
EXCELLENT points!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 06:51 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,059,937 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by logline View Post
I have no possible idea how someone could say that Pratt destroyed Piers in that clip. More like the other way around.
It's very simple how you can, the second any adult calls someone an idiot during a debate or a discussion they have immediately disqualified themselves no matter how many good points they have made. He might as well have said your argument is good, it's angering me, I have no intelligent response and to make up for my inadequacies I'll just call you idiot...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 07:18 PM
 
3,345 posts, read 3,075,481 times
Reputation: 1725
[quote=DewDropInn;27414014]I dislike Piers Morgan but found myself watching it last night just to see what happened.

Pratt came off looking like a pro-gun whack job. Morgan's not dumb. He knew just how to set the interview up and he got the last word in. The Pratt fans won't admit it but he got his butt kicked all over cable. Morgan came off looking like Piers Morgan doing what he does.[/quote



Pratt came off owning Morgan who looked like an out of touch moron ......kind of like this nonsensical and incoherant rambling post of yours
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 08:05 PM
 
25,849 posts, read 16,532,741 times
Reputation: 16027
Piers is pretty wound up, I think he should step back from the debate. I'm pretty much where he's at so I wouldn't even try hosting a debate on the subject.

A guy I work with has some connections to that area. His parents told him they heard the coroner had a nervous breakdown of sorts dealing with all those little babies shot up by this terrible weapon. The AR15 does terrible damage to the human body. It's not designed for defense, it's designed to intimidate and kill. It's essentially a murder weapon, not a defensive weapon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 08:18 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,274,487 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95 View Post
And that is exactly what needs to happen day in and day out until we get peoples' heads out of their behinds on this issue. Piers is to be commended for taking a strong leadership role - we need more spokesmen like him.

This is not a matter of left - right. It is a matter of civilized - savage, thoughtful - reckless, responsible - irresponsible.

Public distribution of guns has got to go....and it will go. As sadly - tragically, the petrified minds of the gun zealots will insure repeat performances of the horror we just went through. You know as well as I that it won't take many more to effect a sea-change in public sentiment. There will come a day when the merchants of death won't dare open their mouths in public and it can't come too soon.
Why don't you see if Piers would want take you with him when he goes back to that much safer country? I think you would surely enjoy yourself there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 08:22 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,707,823 times
Reputation: 22474
Piers Morgan is someone who definitely should not be allowed to buy or own a gun. He's too close to the edge. Definitely ready to come unglued.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 08:24 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,874 posts, read 26,514,597 times
Reputation: 25773
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
Piers Morgan is someone who definitely should not be allowed to buy or own a gun. He's too close to the edge. Definitely ready to come unglued.
He's one of those that would fail a background check if mental illness were reported.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:49 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top