Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-23-2013, 10:01 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,112,686 times
Reputation: 3954

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
The man Harrison J. Bounel has been dead and would be 120 years old if alive today. Why is the SS Administration denying access to a FOIA request to a dead man?
They're not. They're denying access to the information for the person whose SSN was provided; Barack Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-23-2013, 10:02 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,762,126 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wendell Phillips View Post
The term "sovereign citizen" is an oxymoron. To be a "citizen" must admit that one is subject to the rule of law, which is the prerogative of state sovereignty. To be "sovereign" admits no superior rule.

Wow! My how clueless you really are, or are you just playing dumb for the debate?


The sovereignties in Europe, and particularly in England, exist on feudal principles. That system considers the prince as the sovereign, and the people as his subjects; it regards his person as the object of allegiance...



No such ideas obtain here; at the revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects... and have none to govern but themselves...



Chisholm v. Georgia, Dallas' Supreme Court Reports, Vol. 2, Pages
471, 472 (1793)







This means..... Each individual, at least so far as respects his unalienable rights is his own sovereign.


These rights weren't given to any government. In fact, they can't be.



Perhaps you can give up all of your rights, if you so choose, but who has the power to give your rights up for you?

In America, no one can, because we're all equal. In American this principle of popular sovereign is recognized by all governments - state and federal.



When the states became independent, the state governments were formed, all of them based on the authority of the people, and not the will of one man or a small body of men. The federal government as we know it today was created in 1789 when the federal constitution went into effect.



The constitution mentioned something previously unknown in American law:

Citizenship of the United States:

The term, citizens of the United States, must be understood to intend those who were citizens of a state, as such, after the Union had commenced, and the several states had assumed their sovereignties. Before this period there was no citizen of the United States...



Manchester v. Boston, Massachusetts Reports, Vol. 16, Page 235
(1819)






This brings us to what are considered as being the rights inherent in Citizenship in America
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,112,686 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
Wendell, please explain how Harrison J. Bounel and Obama are tied together with the same social security number?
A bad database. There is only a single record that has ever associated the name Bounel with Obama's SSN. There are scores that associate it with Obama.

What happened to the rest of this guy's life if this was actually his SSN?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 10:05 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,112,686 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3~Shepherds View Post
But it does have someone else's 9 numbers.............isn't that a part of identity theft????
You can't steal your own SSN.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 10:06 AM
 
1,523 posts, read 1,442,264 times
Reputation: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547 View Post
That's right--I read your link and it follows what I checked myself pretty closely. Anyone with an Ancestry.com membership who has a little experience with genealogy searches could track down the same thing--there was never a Harrison J. Bounel (or any other form of the name) living in Chicago in 1940, and just as there's no connection to Connecticut for the people with that name or soundex (names that sound like) searches.

The entire thing is made up. Again--I laughed my head off when the link these guys posted showed the Harry Bounel in the Bronx that they're trying to pass off as part of the Cooke County IL census, because it's a photo copy of the actual census record from 1940 NYC cut off at the top and to the right so that none of the identifying information (location, place of birth, etc.)would show.
Look. Nobody is saying he was in the Cook County Census. Where are you getting that from? I never said in the OP that he was in the 1940 Illinois census either. In fact, not one person has said that. The question is why is this guy tied to Barack and Michelle in the data bases using Obama's Connecticut SS number?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 10:07 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,112,686 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
Not about the discovery of the guy in the 1940 census. That new information was released early this morning confirming the guy having the same SS number that Obama has had actually existed.
There is no evidence this is the same guy, or that he had Obama's SSN.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 10:08 AM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,224,414 times
Reputation: 3411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
So what if he is a immigrant. What has that have to do with anything? The key is the 1890 birthdate. The whole census can be seen in my OP and zoomed in on.
I missed the census sheet in your link earlier--it's the same one that I found--which makes the whole thing even dumber. You've found one random person with a name that's CLOSE to what you're claiming (same person I found) but absolutely no connection to the location or any of the other information, and that's what you're basing this whole thing on?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 10:08 AM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,285,193 times
Reputation: 1837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
The 1890 birthday is the key. I sense Doc is exercising caution on this one according to his update.
there is nothing to the 1890 claim.

boy you are surely firing on all of your old claims today. the 1890 date was an artifact from a search done by Susan Daniels, from databases on their own website that stated that the information provided cannot be confirmed as correct.

The Fogbow: Birthers Debunked :: Obama's Social Security number
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 10:08 AM
 
Location: Southern Oregon
3,040 posts, read 5,014,346 times
Reputation: 3422
If Harrison J. Bounel did exist and was born in 1890 then he will show up in all census records from 1890 through 1940 if he died in 1950.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 10:08 AM
 
26,580 posts, read 14,502,669 times
Reputation: 7450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
The key is the 1890 birthdate.
and we know from susan daniels that the SS# was issued in in 1977 or 1978 which would make bounel 87 years old before receiving a SS#.

we also know from obama's selective service registration (the illegally acquired one without the SS# redacted) that he was using the number in 1980. we also know from the poorly redacted tax return that obama was using the number into the 2000's. we also know there is no listing for that number in the SS death index.


so this is how your scenario currently plays out:

harry j. bounel waits till he's 87 then applies for a SS# but gives a CT return address. obama begins using this number within the next 3years and continues to use this number for the next 30+ years. then either:

A): no official announcement of harry's death has reached the SS administration.

B): the SS administration have "scrubbed" the connection between harry and the number.

C): harry is not dead but simply one of the "undead" and he hasn't noticed that orly taitz and multiple other birthers have been splashing his SS# all over the interwebz for the past 2-3 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top