Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why would this be? It seems that he has prepared a litmus test for top military commanders and they will be forced out of service if they answer the questions just a little bit wrong.
Is he preparing to use force on us for something? Surely he is probably using the same test for Congress men and women right now in order to get them to vote for Feinsein's gun grab. I think I just said that I think he may be telling those people much the same kind of thing some of them admitted they were told back in the days of what little debate concerning bailouts.
I think I can show you that back in 2009 there were advertisements among National Guard people about some new jobs that were to be guarding civilians for unstated reasons. Ah yes, I think I have gone too far enough times to find my name on his list and in a place where those NG people may be guarding me till the day that my lack of medications kills me just as it would others who haven't stood up for him.
I am going to offer up a link to an interview with a man named Jim Garrow who has won a real Nobel Prize for saving little girls in China from sure death brought on by the one child law there. The man has many acquaintances who may know more than we do. Anyway, watch the video to see what he thinks is coming. I don't think many of us have known what he tells up to now, but we better wake up before it is too late.
You watched a 21 minute video and read those links in less than 4 minutes. Nice try at deflection but you should have waited a few more minutes so as not to be so obvious.
Why do you give any credence to some random person saying this on his Facebook page? And as to said random person, does anybody else find it odd that his Facebook page indicates he graduated from 4 different high schools over a 6 year period?
The decision to kill a U.S. citizen living abroad who poses a terrorist threat "is among the gravest that government leaders can face," but justified lethal action as legal and sometimes necessary in the war on terror.
The basic oath of all military is to defend the constitution from enemies both domestic and foreign. So to ask a military person whether or not they would fire on an american is merely reenforcing the oath. But as historydude says, I think most in the military would give some pause.
The basic oath of all military is to defend the constitution from enemies both domestic and foreign. So to ask a military person whether or not they would fire on an american is merely reenforcing the oath. But as historydude says, I think most in the military would give some pause.
Bingo.
But more to the point... there is no litmus test. I still have more than a dozen classmates on active duty as general officers. The story of a litmus test is a bald faced lie.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
