Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-17-2013, 02:42 PM
 
Location: #
9,598 posts, read 16,566,362 times
Reputation: 6324

Advertisements

I've mentioned this before, and I think this would be much more effective.

DWI registry (just like for the sex offenders) for life even if you blow a 08000001.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-17-2013, 02:43 PM
 
3,345 posts, read 3,074,946 times
Reputation: 1725
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
Dude, we can't even lock up real criminals these days. Burglars, armed robbers, home invaders are all turned out of our revolving door criminal justice system. And you want to lock up people for life over a couple beers?
Couple of beers and behind the wheel has cost how many lives over the years? There is a reason it is a crime..... anyone who drives drunk is trash..... period ....... and should go to jail after the 2nd offense

We should take all the small timers out of jails (marijuana offenses, petty theft as examples) that would free up a decent amount of space allowing us to house real criminals (serial drunk drivers who shun rehab qualify as this) who victimize and put others at extreme risk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2013, 02:44 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,788,539 times
Reputation: 6663
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
Inslee, lawmakers plan ‘aggressive’ DUI crackdown | Local News | The Seattle Times

We've recently had some horrific crashes here in the Seattle area involving repeat DUI offenders, so there is a push for new legislation.

A state rep named Roger Goodman (D Kirkland) has an interesting new approach. He proposes that anyone convicted of 3 or more DUIs be banned from buying alcohol for 10 years. Enforcement would be effected by creating a special, distinctive driver's license for people with 3 DUI's. This would also mean that clerks and bartenders would have to check ID for every customer, every time.

I heard Rep. Goodman interviewed last night. He said that the approach of taking away their driver's license or car keys doesn't work, because the offenders end up ignoring the law and driving anyway. He also said that a similar system is already in place in Alaska.

What is your opinion on this approach?
Just as expected, a politician blames the alcohol and not the perp. This will be as bad as guns.
1- why should a three-time DUI offender even be allowed a DL?
2- it's not like they won't have others buy it for them, right?
3- they can only do a $hit job of enforcing laws already on the books, so let's add more!!

This is completely and irrevocably backasswards!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2013, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,788,539 times
Reputation: 6663
Quote:
Originally Posted by A&M_Indie_08 View Post
Couple of beers and behind the wheel has cost how many lives over the years? There is a reason it is a crime..... anyone who drives drunk is trash..... period ....... and should go to jail after the 2nd offense

We should take all the small timers out of jails (marijuana offenses, petty theft as examples) that would free up a decent amount of space allowing us to house real criminals (serial drunk drivers who shun rehab qualify as this) who victimize and put others at extreme risk
I agree with you... the one caveat is that you can't be legally intoxicated after a couple of beers. Most drunk drivers aren't driving slightly drunk, they are blowing .15s or worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2013, 03:04 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,291 posts, read 47,043,365 times
Reputation: 34079
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redraven View Post
"He said that the approach of taking away their driver's license or car keys doesn't work, because the offenders end up ignoring the law and driving anyway."

Right. the offenders don't obey the laws that exist now. so we should pass another law. THAT always works, doesn't it!
I like the idea of confiscating the vehicle that is being driven while drunk or stoned, and selling it immediately upon conviction. No, it doesn't matter whose vehicle it is, it gets sold. If you were dumb enough to loan your vehicle to a drunk, and you want it back, feel free to go bid at the auction.
Oh, and the cops keep the money from the auction, so if you owe on the vehicle, you will have to make repayment arrangements with your bank or credit union.
At the same time, allow insurance companies to blacklist the drunk, so he or she can never again get even basic liability insurance.
No license, no insurance, no vehicle, no one to borrow a vehicle from, no drunk driver!
You can't watch your car keys 24/7. That's ridiculous. What are you going to do, lock them in a safe or wear em around your neck like dog tags? Won't your door remote short out in the shower?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2013, 03:06 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,198,564 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maabus1999 View Post
Interesting idea but may be hard to enforce.


really hard to enforce. what will happen is someone goes across a state border to buy their beer or just decide to make their own at home?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2013, 03:24 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Here is my translation of this law.

"We will not do what is necessary to keep repeat offenders off the streets so we propose to make things more complicated for those who abide by our laws".

I should note based upon the statement above.....nobody has ever been nor is anyone suggesting that people get put in prison for life for having a couple beers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2013, 04:26 PM
 
Location: Capital Hill
1,599 posts, read 3,133,759 times
Reputation: 850
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
Inslee, lawmakers plan ‘aggressive’ DUI crackdown | Local News | The Seattle Times

We've recently had some horrific crashes here in the Seattle area involving repeat DUI offenders, so there is a push for new legislation.

A state rep named Roger Goodman (D Kirkland) has an interesting new approach. He proposes that anyone convicted of 3 or more DUIs be banned from buying alcohol for 10 years. Enforcement would be effected by creating a special, distinctive driver's license for people with 3 DUI's. This would also mean that clerks and bartenders would have to check ID for every customer, every time.

I heard Rep. Goodman interviewed last night. He said that the approach of taking away their driver's license or car keys doesn't work, because the offenders end up ignoring the law and driving anyway. He also said that a similar system is already in place in Alaska.

What is your opinion on this approach?
Inslee, himself has some pretty saviour fines that I heard on the news. They may be a little more realistic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2013, 04:46 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,452,578 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
Inslee, lawmakers plan ‘aggressive’ DUI crackdown | Local News | The Seattle Times

We've recently had some horrific crashes here in the Seattle area involving repeat DUI offenders, so there is a push for new legislation.

A state rep named Roger Goodman (D Kirkland) has an interesting new approach. He proposes that anyone convicted of 3 or more DUIs be banned from buying alcohol for 10 years. Enforcement would be effected by creating a special, distinctive driver's license for people with 3 DUI's. This would also mean that clerks and bartenders would have to check ID for every customer, every time.

I heard Rep. Goodman interviewed last night. He said that the approach of taking away their driver's license or car keys doesn't work, because the offenders end up ignoring the law and driving anyway. He also said that a similar system is already in place in Alaska.

What is your opinion on this approach?
That is true. We have had such restrictions in Alaska for several years. The court can prohibit anyone from purchasing alcohol for a specified period (set by the court). A new driver's license is issued with a big red letter "J" on it, and it costs you an additional $50. We also have an ignition interlock device that must be installed, even after just one DUI conviction.

Everyone purchasing alcohol in Alaska is carded, regardless of age.

Personally, I like the idea. It may be a hassle to show ID when you are well over 50 years old, like me, but if it prevents just one drunk from getting on the road and killing someone it is worth the hassle. Those who cannot handle drinking alcohol responsibly should not be allowed to drink alcohol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2013, 04:56 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,869 posts, read 26,508,031 times
Reputation: 25773
Quote:
Originally Posted by A&M_Indie_08 View Post
Couple of beers and behind the wheel has cost how many lives over the years? There is a reason it is a crime..... anyone who drives drunk is trash..... period ....... and should go to jail after the 2nd offense

We should take all the small timers out of jails (marijuana offenses, petty theft as examples) that would free up a decent amount of space allowing us to house real criminals (serial drunk drivers who shun rehab qualify as this) who victimize and put others at extreme risk
I'd agree with you on pot, but we should let DWIs out and lock up real criminals. We would rather bust someone for a couple drinks because they are a source of revenue. Our system seems to favor releasing real criminals, such as burglars, car thiefs, those that steal firearms, let alone domestic abusers or those guilty of assault. If we locked up every car thief or burglar for 10 years, you'd see our crime rate plummet.

If we're going to lock up DWIs for the risk they pose, we should do the same with anyone that texts while driving or has more than 2 screaming, distracting kids in a vehicle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top