Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 05-08-2013, 07:07 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
More anger and insults......

Have a nice day.
Ahh, poor baby..

Its not my fault if you dont have a basic comprehension of economics and have to rely upon talking points to make an argument. If you get insulted by me pointing that out then maybe you need to question why you think it in the first place.

 
Old 05-08-2013, 07:09 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,640,534 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
The Dems score another victory .... and the Repubs are whining .... as usual.

Face it .... your side has done nothing but b-tch and moan for the past 5 years, and meanwhile, Obama and the Dems still managed to pull this country out of the Great Recession even with Repubs blocking their path nearly every step of the way.

I think both 2014 and 2016 are beginning to look real good for the Dems!
It will be seen as a Dem victory whether it is true or not, and that seems to cause some heads explode around here. The GOP lost the fight when they tried to blame Dems for the pain caused by the Sequester, tax cut expiration etc, and now it turns out that those measures turned the tide.
 
Old 05-08-2013, 07:11 AM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,536,757 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
The article spelled it out, so why do you have to take that tone?

"You guys"? Show me where I took credit for anything. I am not even a Democrat. As for the GOP Congress, whoever made the comment is correct. The GOP Congress has done everything in their power to make recovery more difficult. They should be ashamed of themselves.
 
Old 05-08-2013, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,951,723 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
or more likely, your understanding of whats needed to have a recovery is totally screwed up and ridiculous.

CUTTING SPENDING DOES NOT CRASH THE ECONOMY..
It depends upon how much is cut. But the belief that cutting doesn't have any effect on the economy is economic voodoo.

Let's review some economics:



where:

C = private consumption
I = gross investment
G = government spending
X = exports
M = imports

When "G" is reduced, GDP is reduced as well.


Regarding what we are discussing, the sequester is cutting government spending. As such, it necessarily drops GDP.
 
Old 05-08-2013, 07:12 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
It will be seen as a Dem victory whether it is true or not, and that seems to cause some heads explode around here. The GOP lost the fight when they tried to blame Dems for the pain caused by the Sequester, tax cut expiration etc, and now it turns out that those measures turned the tide.
It must take a genius of all sorts to recognize that cutting spending results in lower deficits. Something you guys have been objecting to for years now, and calling for more spending, calling it "stimulations". Now of course you're all surprised by common sense.

Last edited by pghquest; 05-08-2013 at 07:21 AM..
 
Old 05-08-2013, 07:14 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
It depends upon how much is cut. But the belief that cutting doesn't have any effect on the economy is economic voodoo.

Let's review some economics:

where:

C = private consumption
I = gross investment
G = government spending
X = exports
M = imports

When "G" is reduced, GDP is reduced as well.

Regarding what we are discussing, the sequester is cutting government spending. As such, it necessarily drops GDP.
It seems that you are the one that needs the economics lesson because the GDP could go 10x as high as it currently is and we still wouldnt be better off if the value of the dollar falls 1/15th due to higher debt.

Once again, all of that debt results in negiative gdp growth in the future because the interest needs to be paid, and eventually the debt repaid, even if it by new debt.

Typical MTA, finds one part of an equasion and pretends it represents the sum..

Tell me MTA, have you found one town yet that has a boombing economy due to increased welfare spending? It cant be that difficult to find a real life example of the results of your economic voo do crap knowledge.
 
Old 05-08-2013, 07:16 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,870,209 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
It depends upon how much is cut. But the belief that cutting doesn't have any effect on the economy is economic voodoo.

Let's review some economics:



where:

C = private consumption
I = gross investment
G = government spending
X = exports
M = imports

When "G" is reduced, GDP is reduced as well.


Regarding what we are discussing, the sequester is cutting government spending. As such, it necessarily drops GDP.
GDP is as worthless as the CPI you love to quote. It doesn't take into account quality and now GDP has been redefined again. GDP is a joke.
 
Old 05-08-2013, 07:31 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,951,723 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
It seems that you are the one that needs the economics lesson because the GDP could go 10x as high as it currently is and we still wouldnt be better off if the value of the dollar falls 1/15th due to higher debt.

Once again, all of that debt results in negiative gdp growth in the future because the interest needs to be paid, and eventually the debt repaid, even if it by new debt.

Typical MTA, finds one part of an equasion and pretends it represents the sum..

Tell me MTA, have you found one town yet that has a boombing economy due to increased welfare spending? It cant be that difficult to find a real life example of the results of your economic voo do crap knowledge.
First, the dollar hasn't fallen in recent times, so that makes your first argument moot.
Second, the debt does not result in 'negative GDP.' Think of it this way, the economy is operating at below potential GDP. As such, there are idle resources and lots of uninvested money. Thus, when the government borrows that uninvested money it is not crowding out private investment.

Third, the borrowed money puts people to work and employs people who then spend their earnings. Those earnings buy goods and services that put others to work. All of those workers pay taxes they weren't otherwise paying, that more than pays for the interest on the original borrowing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
GDP is as worthless as the CPI you love to quote. It doesn't take into account quality and now GDP has been redefined again. GDP is a joke.
'GDP is worthless and the CPI is fudged.' Doubling down on economic voodoo.
 
Old 05-08-2013, 07:32 AM
 
Location: San Diego
5,319 posts, read 8,986,362 times
Reputation: 3396
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Who's whining? Pointing out that Democrats projected that the economy was going to crash due to the sequester, that jobs were going to be lossed, etc isnt whining. You dont like me pointing out how your economic theories are not only wrong, but utterly stupid, tough.

The economy will grow when GOVERNMENT stops interjecting itself into the economy. So if you are now saying Republicans are responsible for that stoppage, crediting Democrats is pretty dam dumb.
Our recovery is happening because Obama and the Dems worked hard at making it happen!

The annual deficit is down because Dems fought against extending Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.

You remember ... those tax cuts which started shortly after Bush took office ... which helped to run up our current 16 Trillion Nation Debt?

Bush tax cuts - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quote:
Before the tax cuts, the highest marginal income tax rate was 39.6 percent. After the cuts, the highest rate was 35 percent. Once the cuts were eliminated for high income levels (single people making $400,000+ per year and couples making $450,000+ per year), the top income tax rate returned to 39.6 percent.
 
Old 05-08-2013, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
It was predicted that there would be a large tax revenue this year as people sold to get the cap gains before it changed.
Just don't expect as big a revenue next year though.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top