Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-10-2013, 11:57 AM
NCN
 
Location: NC/SC Border Patrol
21,662 posts, read 25,617,651 times
Reputation: 24373

Advertisements

I love the thread question? Good question. Now let's see those that think anyone that does not swallow climate change as being our fault is crazy, answer it. They can't because there is no answer except that climates change and always have whether or not humans have anything to do with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-10-2013, 12:03 PM
 
Location: WA
4,242 posts, read 8,772,004 times
Reputation: 2375
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCN View Post
I love the thread question? Good question. Now let's see those that think anyone that does not swallow climate change as being our fault is crazy, answer it. They can't because there is no answer except that climates change and always have whether or not humans have anything to do with it.
Um. Do you people really believe all those NOAA scientists don't already know that the climate has been changing for the past 4.5 billion years? As if this information about how our atmosphere works, which apparently conservatives have just recently stumbled upon, will turn the state of climate science on its head.


NOAA Scientist: OMG, did you know that there's this huge thing called the OCEAN that absorbs and releases carbon dioxide??

Other NOAA Scientist: Holy crap, really? No way! Surely this is going to change the entire stance of all scientists who were apparently unaware of the presence of the ocean!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Volunteer State
1,243 posts, read 1,146,190 times
Reputation: 2159
The questions I would really loved answered if this:

Are there any historical/geological records - and I mean really accurate, specific, verifiable records - that show whether or not any rapid changes like the one we are supposedly* going through now has happened before?
How many times?
Was was supposedly the causes then?
Was man around at the time?
What was the predominant organism at the time?

If it could be proven - and I mean PROVEN, not supported - that this supposed* rapid change has never occurred in the 4.8 billion year history of the earth, then I will accept that we (man) are solely (or mostly) repsonsible.

Until then, I'm a skeptic.

* I say "supposed" because their does exist evidence that the "rapidity" is not quite accurate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,414,093 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlenextyear View Post
Climate change is a completely natural occurrence. The current EXTREMELY RAPID changes we're seeing in the climate is not a natural occurrence.

Extinction is a completely natural occurrence. The EXTREMELY RAPID rate of extinction we're seeing today by rapid deforestation in the tropics is not a natural occurrence.

Evolution is a natural molding force. The EXTREMELY RAPID rate of breed creation in dogs in the Victorian era was not a natural occurrence.

Forest fires are a natural occurrence. The EXTREMELY hot, rampant, large forest fires that are occurring due to fire suppression practices are not a natural occurrence.

The eutrophication of a lake as it ages is a natural occurrence. The EXTREMELY RAPID eutrophication of a lake because we dump a bunch of sewage into it is not a natural occurrence.

So yes, humans have the ability to speed up, slow down, worsen and sometimes even improve natural processes.
Are humans not natural?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,847,737 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHurricaneKid View Post
On average, the global average temperature is practically the same. Incoming radiation is equal to outgoing radiation. Yet over millions of years, very insignificant and very minimal daily changes have sent the earth between a ball of ice and a ball of fire.

...Consider the different heat retention properties of things like water and land.
...Consider the physical differences between solid water and water vapor and it's significance to weather.
...Consider the heat retention of the various gases in the atmosphere.
...Consider the fact that the night and day temperatures vary greatly on Mercury and aren't present on Venus.
...Consider the light blocking properties of matter in the atmosphere.
...Consider the temperature inversion in the atmosphere
...Consider the average temperature of the hydrosphere.
...Consider slow moving ocean currents.
A lot of it due to volcanic activity which we are emulating at an increasing rate, why do you ask?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 12:40 PM
 
Location: WA
4,242 posts, read 8,772,004 times
Reputation: 2375
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
Are humans not natural?
That's a question for a philosopher to answer, perhaps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 12:46 PM
 
9,659 posts, read 10,223,337 times
Reputation: 3225
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
A lot of it due to volcanic activity which we are emulating at an increasing rate, why do you ask?
Doesn't volcanic activity involve blocking sunlight and reducing the temperature?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 12:55 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,779,270 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlenextyear View Post
Climate change is a completely natural occurrence. The current EXTREMELY RAPID changes we're seeing in the climate is not a natural occurrence.
And your proof that man has anything to do with this is where.....??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,847,737 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHurricaneKid View Post
Doesn't volcanic activity involve blocking sunlight and reducing the temperature?
Not entirely ...

http://volcanology.geol.ucsb.edu/gas.htm
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 12:59 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,806,382 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
Are humans not natural?
You can't differentiate between humans and a process?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top