Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which tax would you eliminate if you could?
Income tax 42 48.28%
Property tax 22 25.29%
Sales tax 12 13.79%
Other 9 10.34%
None 2 2.30%
Voters: 87. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-15-2013, 03:10 PM
 
2,089 posts, read 1,418,277 times
Reputation: 3105

Advertisements

Property tax for retirees on limited income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-15-2013, 08:32 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,469,142 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seagrape Grove View Post
Property tax for retirees on limited income.

What about retirees on limited income who rent? Their homes should be taxed while homeowners get a pass?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2013, 08:36 PM
 
3,617 posts, read 3,885,492 times
Reputation: 2295
Payroll.

Regressive, favors rentiers over workers, economically distorting, discourages both work and employment, could go on. It's the worst designed major tax in our system from both a policy/efficiency standpoint and a fairness standpoint
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2013, 08:39 PM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,861,848 times
Reputation: 9283
I said property tax because its the one tax you owe even when doing nothing...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2013, 08:43 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,150,886 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seagrape Grove View Post
Property tax for retirees on limited income.
I can understand senior citizens having capped property tax. Cap it at $10,000/year or something. They don't use many of the amenities property taxes go towards. But eliminating them seems silly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2013, 11:38 AM
 
2,089 posts, read 1,418,277 times
Reputation: 3105
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
I can understand senior citizens having capped property tax. Cap it at $10,000/year or something. They don't use many of the amenities property taxes go towards. But eliminating them seems silly.
Many retirees have to sell their homes because they can no longer afford the property taxes. A reduced or graduated property tax based on income would seem fair to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2013, 11:49 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,799,372 times
Reputation: 24863
I would remove ALL taxes, including state, county and local, and replace them with an Income Tax based on all income from all sources with a 90th percentile deduction. the tax would be collected on a Federal level and half would be redistributed to the states on a per capita basis. The states could then redistribute then as they saw fit.

Not only would this place the burden of operating the country on the people that own and control it the insane redistribution of Federal money from the Blue States to the Red states would cease.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2013, 12:01 PM
 
Location: South Portland, Maine
2,356 posts, read 5,720,645 times
Reputation: 1537
1!
Property tax because it is a direct tax and hinders the absolute right to own property for which I believe is part of the American dream!!

2.
Income tax! because again it is a direct tax and is so unfairly levied that half of the population does not even pay it. When people have to actually dig into their own wallet and pay for our government instead of using it then they might care where and how much money is wasted.

Income taxes, gas taxes ect... all non direct taxes that tax usage in my opinion are far superior. Everyone pays it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2013, 12:03 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,230,847 times
Reputation: 12102
All of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2013, 12:25 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,469,142 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seagrape Grove View Post
Many retirees have to sell their homes because they can no longer afford the property taxes. A reduced or graduated property tax based on income would seem fair to me.

Many retirees have to move because they can no longer afford the property taxes when the landlord jacks up the rent to cover the latest property tax increase.

Why do you want to kick retired renters on the street while you protect homeowners from having to move because of property taxes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:24 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top