CNN Bombshell: CIA Personnel in Benghazi Silenced with Threats to Their Families by Obama Regime (military, terrorists)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Obama is dirty.. his administration is dirty. They strong arm and lie.. to create their image of goodness .. it is so laughable how people still think this guy is clean.
Your idea of a perfect world very weird. Even in your best dreams, the man you didnt like got elected.
There is also the thought that in a perfect world, none of these people would be silenced because Bengahzi would have never happened.
Also, your idea of a perfect world seems to be that the judicial system would agree with everything you think.
and LOL at the last line. No from day one you guys came up with some crazy argument that they were covering up that Benghazi had even happened, which made no sense at all.
Go ahead and deflect. The more you deflect the more foolish you look each time something new comes to light.
First it was a protest over a video. Then it wasn't a protest over a video, but things were too chaotic so the administration didn't realize that. There was nothing indicating it was a terrorist attack. Then there was an indication but we were only protesting Susan Rice because we're racists. Nobody in the administration changed the talking points. Oh, okay they did change the talking points but only because of national security.
Liberal partisan hacks like to point and laugh at the birthers but are becoming a laughingstock themselves. They are just like birthers. Birthers are trying to prove something that isn't true and and won't quit no matter how many times they're proved wrong. Obama defenders are trying to do the same thing, continuously trying to deny wrongdoing that is blatantly obvious, and they are looking just as desperate and ridiculous as the birthers in the process.
Obama is dirty.. his administration is dirty. They strong arm and lie.. to create their image of goodness .. it is so laughable how people still think this guy is clean.
Did you ever watch The Peanuts as a kid? I remember when Charlie Brown's teacher would speak all you heard was "wah wah wah wah wah". That's exactly what the right wing rhetoric sounds like these days. You guys try so hard to come up with something to slander the President but can never quite find that perfect "scandal" to suite your needs. It's so funny to see you guys get all worked up over things like this and fail so miserably to get anyone other than the RWNJ crowd to get on board with you. Want me to tell you why? Because NO ONE CARES about your made up scandals. Your guy lost, deal with it.
Did you ever watch The Peanuts as a kid? I remember when Charlie Brown's teacher would speak all you heard was "wah wah wah wah wah". That's exactly what the right wing rhetoric sounds like these days. You guys try so hard to come up with something to slander the President but can never quite find that perfect "scandal" to suite your needs. It's so funny to see you guys get all worked up over things like this and fail so miserably to get anyone other than the RWNJ crowd to get on board with you. Want me to tell you why? Because NO ONE CARES about your made up scandals. Your guy lost, deal with it.
I hardly think any of 'us guys' had anything to do with any of the scandals that this administration has circling it now.
I do however think that 'you guys' will not question anything this government, this president, this DOJ, this IRS, does. Blind allegiance and indifference is a dangerous thing.
Hey, you do know the IRS set this scandal free on their own, right?
Change all the nouns in just the IRS scandal subjects to left wing persons or organizations and then tell us it's just their duty.
It ain't about who lost. It's how he lost. It's how this administration manipulated the data provided by government officials, the media and the president to ensure his legacy lives on.
Your leader didn't get anyone out of the ditch. If anything he put more people into it.
It ain't about who lost. It's how he lost. It's how this administration manipulated the data provided by government officials, the media and the president to ensure his legacy lives on.
Certainly manipulating information to influence the minds of voters is underhanded, but the more we learn, it appears that the level of incompetence that the administration rose(or lowered - as the case may be)to is at least as alarming.
But as Hillary said, all the left wants people to think is "what difference does it make?"
It makes a lot of difference.
The safety of our foreign service personel and the national security of the United States is rather important - wouldn't we all agree?
I am surprise CNN is digging in this
and I am very interested in what else is going to come up
Hillary Clinton might not be so cocky to run for president
if this story comes out
she was so hateful; and nasty in the hearings
I regret EVER supporting her in 08 this might be the undoing of mr Obama
we shall see
Boy, let's hope so. I am so tired of scandal-ridden, unaccountable government. Meanwhile, we're still waiting for The Chosen One's answers to where he was that night.
Just minutes after 35 jihadists crashed through the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, nearly one year ago, the facility got word to the State Department, FBI and Pentagon that terrorists were attacking, according to a forthcoming book that provides the fullest review of the assault to date.
In “Under Fire, the Untold Story of the Attack in Benghazi,” it is revealed that an unidentified security official in the Benghazi compound protecting Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens messaged the U.S. embassy in Tripoli: “Benghazi under fire, terrorist attack.” Stevens and three others died that night.
Twenty-five minutes after it began, the operation center at State received an electronic cable announcing the attack, according to authors Fred Burton, a former State Diplomatic Security agent and Samuel Katz, an author and expert on international special operations and counterterrorism.
Their findings in "Under Fire," based on exclusive interviews of those in the battle, refute days of claims by the administration that the attack was sparked by Muslim anger at a U.S.-made anti-Muslim film, and raise new questions as President Obama eyes military action in Syria that U.S. diplomatic posts in the region are properly protected.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
