What about North Korea?? (Congress, Iran, enemies, generation)

[KYBob]

Don't worry about North Korea. We just sent Ambassador Rdoman over there to straighten things out!

[Ed from California]

Still no answer on why Syria. Just the usual "look, over there!" from the lefties.

This is not about past presidents, past policy, etc. It's about the boy king telling us how different foreign policy would be under his regime. Guess he lied about that too.

[burdell]

Originally Posted by Ed from California

Still no answer on why Syria. Just the usual "look, over there!" from the lefties.

This is not about past presidents, past policy, etc. It's about the boy king telling us how different foreign policy would be under his regime. Guess he lied about that too.

Still no answer for your sudden concern with North Korea, I guess hypocrisy would be the most succinct, eh?

[weltschmerz]

Originally Posted by gtc08

according to the 98 percent of the worlds presented that signed the chemical treaty 100 years ago it is.

we cant jump in every conflict.

gassing your own people is as bad as it gets.

you stand on the sidelines here burdell, you say its ok for him to keep gassing.

Starving and torturing people is worse in my book. It's a much slower death.

[intelfan11315]

Originally Posted by gtc08

again, do you see them being gassed? there was a world agreement about the use of chemical weapons going back 100 years.

you guys might be ok with kids and women being gassed.

im not.

So you were for the war in Iraq? Because Sadaam had killed over 100,000 people.

[weltschmerz]

Originally Posted by Ed from California

So far, predictably, the lefties here are scrambling to find something coherent to say. The usual name calling, "but Bush", and other deflective comments.

Keep trying. Tell me why it's OK for millions to starve and/or be put to death in NK but rebels gassing people in Syria calls for an obama cruise missile attack?

This leftie says it isn't OK.

[burdell]

Originally Posted by weltschmerz

This leftie says it isn't OK.

And whose responsibility would you say it is to put an end to it?

[weltschmerz]

Originally Posted by Michigantown

I am sure Seoul would love to get bombed.

Sarah? Sarah Palin, is that you? Seoul isn't in North Korea.

[weltschmerz]

Originally Posted by burdell

And whose responsibility would you say it is to put an end to it?

Not ours and not yours. We can't even tell the good guys apart from the bad guys. We should stay out of it.

[brienzi]

Originally Posted by rbohm

north korea has been quiet since 1953, for the most part. and while there are atrocities going on there, it is nothing compared to what goes on in china or russia where the media cant get in. and dont forget that if we were to go into north korea, we would have to deal with china as well UNLESS there was good solid reason for the chinese to stay out of a conflict between the US and NK.

but lets go further, why isnt anyone doing anything about the happenings in various african countries? the point is that there are atrocities all around the world, and we cant stop them all, we dont have the manpower, and we dont have the authority. we also have to look at the bigger picture in each of these conflicts, starting with what is the US interest in joining any conflict?

R u kidding me!! The media CAN'T get into NK, it's all staged BS for the few if any times the media is allowed
in. There is access to China and Russia, but NONE allowed in NK.

The job of Most North Koreans is finding grass to eat during the day or whatever they can eat that won't
kill em. Never mind electricity i won't even go there.

And agree the UN is a joke...A facade for we all know who has to clean the dirty laundry.. The good old USA..

Where dammed if we do, dammed if we don't!

I say stay the hell out!