Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-27-2013, 11:51 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,745,694 times
Reputation: 1531

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
Obama is only a liberal when you compare him to far right lunatics, most sane and moderates don't consider him a liberal or leftist.

Doesn't matter, if Hillary runs she'll win. So get used to 4 more years
how will she win? on this record? wise up don...only you could that name and turn into a weak, empty head mindless beta male entity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-27-2013, 11:53 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,745,694 times
Reputation: 1531
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucknow View Post
If Obama had not had to contend with the RWNJs in congress, and his ideas had been given a chance things would be very different today.

Do you know the REAL reason the RWNJs oppose Obama's ideas with an incredible insanity?????
They fear above all else, that if implemented they would WORK WELL. That is the sole reason they oppose. Just consider for a minute. If they had just let the president run with his agenda in his first term and things worked out as badly as they would have you believe then Romney would now be sitting in the Oval office. The RWNJs only agenda is the protection of the 1%. Nothing else at all matters to them. They would sink the entire nation rather than let one single simple measure through if they thought it would have a negative impact on their masters. It just makes me sick.
yeah they have not work in any other nation, ever, so why would they work here?

they wont work...period..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 11:56 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,745,694 times
Reputation: 1531
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
This is like bragging about how comfortable and smooth the ride on the Titanic was right before the whole iceberg thing. You're probably not even aware that 2006 was the peak year of the housing bubble, huh? Guess what happened in 2007.

Bush and the Republicans were an unprecedented disaster. Two wars AND tax cuts? Obama was essentially handed a depression by the Cons. It he gets it all back to normal within 8 years, consider it a miracle and an amazing accomplishment.

Btw, repeatedly calling our president a "boy king" is flat out racist and disgraceful.
willy wonka so obama inherited a messs, huh? Well so do firemen but you dont see them pour gas on the sucker
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 05:33 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,350,388 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
....................and what caused "the ship to sink"? Liberal policy.

1. Liberals started the policy of banning "red lining"

2. Liberal policy demanded that Fannie and Freddie finance home loans to unqualified borrowers

3. Frank and Dodd defended Fannie and Freddie, as they were receiving campaign cash from them

4. Clinton repealed Glass-Steagle

5. A "toxic stew" of bad assets was created by liberal policy to feed to the banks, like "chum" to sharks

6. Oddly, George Bush, who LIBS blame for the financial meltdown, was one of the few who warned of the impending disaster.


Liberalism has always, and will always, create financial disasters, as it is based in irrational emotional principles which defy rational thought and logic.


I am so tired of you crazy libs using the word "racist". It has simply lost any meaning or power whatsoever and now means anyone who opposes far left liberal policy and has nothing to do with race.


Sooo.............................................. back to my ORIGINAL QUESTION, 13 PAGES AGO. WHAT DO LIBERALS ACTUALLY PROPOSE FOR 2016, AFTER EIGHT YEARS OF FAILURE, TO REVERSE THE TREND OF HIGHER UNEMPLOYMENT, LOWER WAGES, FEWER HOURS, AND LOWER LIVING STANDARDS????????

YOU WILL HAVE HAD EIGHT YEARS AND FAILED MISERABLY. DO YOU SIMPLY WANT FOUR MORE YEARS OF THE SAME FAILED POLICIES, OR ARE THERE ACTUALLY ANY LIBERAL "SOLUTIONS" TO STIMULATE JOB GROWTH AND PROMOTE HIGHER INCOMES????

SO FAR, NO LIBERAL HAS OFFERED ANYTHING. This is, unfortunately, what America has to "look forward to". Liberals, via their ineptitude and incompetence, are sewing the seeds of insurrection. Free people will not accept disasterous economic "plans" foisted upon them for long. Perhaps libs need to read history and understand how these situations eventually unfold.


Of course they've offered nothing. All they can come up with is deflection and cries of racism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 06:20 AM
Status: "We need America back!" (set 5 days ago)
 
Location: Suburban Dallas
52,693 posts, read 47,975,215 times
Reputation: 33855
After eight years of Obama, our society will have eroded to proportions we've never before seen. Hope And Change, huh? It's only going to get ugly. Nonetheless, it won't be that impossible to salvage when conservatives take back all branches of government.

And they will, and sooner than some of you leftists out there choose to think. Besides, none of you liberal extremists have offered any answers regarding solutions to our problems, let alone questions asked to you by good, upstanding, conservative posters who demand answers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 06:30 AM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,554,254 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
After Obama is out, libs will have had eight years of control. Eight years of president, eight years of senate control (we will see in 2014), and two years of congressional control. Few, if any presidents, have had such a political landscape in which they could implement thier policy.

So.................... after eight years of

lower incomes
more unemployment
lower savings
more in poverty
more on foodstamps
more homeless
more part time workers

...........................what next? More of the same policy of the previous eight years? If not, what "new" ideas will liberals have to reverse the above trend? Do you contend it will take sixteen years? Fifty years? Why did it take Reagan only three years?
It's all Bush's fault...... They'll just ignore the fact that obummer has failed to fix anything since taking office. Apparently, it's ok to not actually do the job you were elected to do if your predecessor is seen as having left a mess. Never mind that you were actually elected to fix said mess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 06:40 AM
 
6,073 posts, read 4,755,703 times
Reputation: 2635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
You expect the government to increase your personal income, savings, employment, home ownership, and decrease personal debt?

Maybe you are the socialist
no. we don't, but you did, which is why you voted for barry. hillary clinton is well over 100 years old, and suffered brain damage recently. good luck with that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 06:43 AM
 
Location: Better half of PA
1,391 posts, read 1,234,266 times
Reputation: 617
Quote:
Originally Posted by lionsgators View Post
no. we don't, but you did, which is why you voted for barry. hillary clinton is well over 100 years old, and suffered brain damage recently. good luck with that.
Which makes her 91 years older than your posts suggest you are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 07:45 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,541,024 times
Reputation: 25816
Instead of whining about Hillary and Obama - why aren't the Republicans putting their heads together to find a decent candidate for 2016? No tea party extremist is going to win.

Take back the white house and quite whining about it. I'm really sick of all the whining and hand wringing. Be proactive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 07:52 AM
 
6,073 posts, read 4,755,703 times
Reputation: 2635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
Instead of whining about Hillary and Obama - why aren't the Republicans putting their heads together to find a decent candidate for 2016? No tea party extremist is going to win.

Take back the white house and quite whining about it. I'm really sick of all the whining and hand wringing. Be proactive.
if you're truly sick of whining, why are you a part of a party that does nothing but whine?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top