Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-18-2013, 09:16 PM
 
Location: South Bay
1,404 posts, read 1,032,350 times
Reputation: 525

Advertisements

To be clear; This isn't a bash Obamacare thread. I just want to point out a few things that we now know, and ask a simple question.

1: We were promised that rates would go down.

Today on CSPAN the head of NY health services admitted that only 10% of the people signing up on their exchange would see their rates go down after subsidies. She admitted that 90% will pay more. I'm seeing far more people complaining about rates going up, than people with positive reviews.

2: We were told that we could keep our existing plan if we wanted to.

People are now getting their letters of cancellation en'masse because nearly all private plans will not meet the ACA minimums. Things like middle aged and elderly being required to have pregnancy coverage.

3: It's coming to light that the exchanges are intentionally shielding the ability to anonymously shop the plans. They require to input all of your info first, and then present a ballpark screenshot. That is, if you can make it to that point before the site locks up or crashes.

I'm just curious to know that if 90% of peoples rates increase, and only 10% decrease... there's going to be a ton of mad people both left and right in a few months. With these facts coming to light, and if the numbers will actually be this bad; who should/will take responsibility for what appears to be impending failure?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-18-2013, 09:30 PM
 
Location: Alaska
7,507 posts, read 5,755,367 times
Reputation: 4891
What you posted is most likely just the surface of this obamanation. It's sad really because I don't know of one person liberal or conservative that doesn't believe folks should have access to affordable care. Unfortunately, the lying sack of chit in the white house and his cronies Reid, Pelosi etc.. rammed this down everyone's throats under a false premise. It will collapse due to its design or lack there of..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2013, 09:32 PM
 
11,181 posts, read 10,536,509 times
Reputation: 18618
Quote:
Originally Posted by surfman View Post
Things like middle aged and elderly being required to have pregnancy coverage.

Applying your logic: I have been required for the past 45 years to have enlarged prostate coverage, even though I'm a woman.

ACA simply states:
"By 2014, all plans sold to individuals will be required to cover maternity care."

In plain English: individual plans can no longer EXCLUDE gender-specific conditions, like pregnancy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2013, 09:32 PM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,228,838 times
Reputation: 35019
My goodness, how many "he said if we liked it we could keep it" threads do we have on here now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2013, 10:17 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,972,625 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
My goodness, how many "he said if we liked it we could keep it" threads do we have on here now?
However many it takes till you admit they lied... and that you LOVE liars in charge of your health care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2013, 10:51 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,469,695 times
Reputation: 8599
Quote:
Originally Posted by surfman View Post
We were promised that rates would go down.
Most rates will go down with the tax credits. From the beginning the exchange plan rates (pre tax credit) were only expected to be about 10% lower than non exchange plans.
Quote:
It's coming to light that the exchanges are intentionally shielding the ability to anonymously shop the plans. They require to input all of your info first, and then present a ballpark screenshot. That is, if you can make it to that point before the site locks up or crashes.
You can see plan rates at this link on healthcare.gov - but of course can't see your specific tax credit until you apply and enter your info.
https://www.healthcare.gov/find-premium-estimates/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2013, 05:04 AM
 
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,946,204 times
Reputation: 2385
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
However many it takes till you admit they lied... and that you LOVE liars in charge of your health care.

Hey OP, I glad you didint start a "Obamacare bashing" thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2013, 05:40 AM
 
Location: South Bay
1,404 posts, read 1,032,350 times
Reputation: 525
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
Hey OP, I glad you didint start a "Obamacare bashing" thread.
That's just it, I didn't. Your sarcasm shows that you have no real answer. I only asked a simple question based on the facts that have come to light. I'm sorry if these simple facts make you nervous about what you thought was the truth.

katzpaw said: Most rates will go down with the tax credits. From the beginning the exchange plan rates (pre tax credit) were only expected to be about 10% lower than non exchange plans.

This goes directly against what the head of NY health services said. She made it clear that only 10% of people will actually see their healthcare rates go down. Nobody has addressed why we are unable to keep our private plans. Were we not promised we could?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2013, 05:46 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,315,673 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by biscuitmom View Post

Applying your logic: I have been required for the past 45 years to have enlarged prostate coverage, even though I'm a woman.

ACA simply states:
"By 2014, all plans sold to individuals will be required to cover maternity care."

In plain English: individual plans can no longer EXCLUDE gender-specific conditions, like pregnancy.
So what? People are still forced to pay for something they don't need.

Go back to baking biscuits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2013, 05:47 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,547,733 times
Reputation: 6392
And this is just the SIGN UP process for Obamacare.

Wait for the actual implementation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:44 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top