Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-19-2013, 04:16 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,465,032 times
Reputation: 8599

Advertisements

In this economy many have poor credit because of job loss/decreased income and can't keep up the debt payments. They are looking for a job to get out of this hole but are caught in this no-job-if-you-have-bad-credit Catch 22.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-19-2013, 04:19 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,262,817 times
Reputation: 3444
I've always thought it was messed up that your credit could disqualify you from a job. There is a bit of a difference between someone that loses everything in a recession and someone that spends irresponsibly, but I'm not confident that employers make the distinction.

It just seems like a vicious cycle imo and I'm not confident that employers discern between someone that suffered under an economic meltdown and someone that spends irresponsibly. I'm not even sure there is a correlation between job performance and personal spending habits, though I can se the concern if the position is sensitive.

You're unemployed? We don't want you.
You couldn't pay your bills after you were laid off? We don't want you.
Your house was foreclosed on after you lost your job? We don't want you.
You went bankrupt after your company went out of business? We don't want you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 04:20 PM
 
Location: California
11,466 posts, read 19,351,670 times
Reputation: 12713
A credit check shows responsibility, I have no problem in it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Where it's cold in winter.
1,074 posts, read 758,082 times
Reputation: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
^^^^This.
What does that mean?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 04:22 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,262,817 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
It's not enforceable.
Actually it is because entities needs your legal permission to pull your credit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 04:24 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,262,817 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
I want warren to step up and be the first one to hire someone off the street....no background check, no credit check, to be her housekeeper.

You can bet your life that the millionaire socialist has anyone who comes near her or her property 100% scrutinized before they can even apply to work for her.

But again, "Socialism is for the people, not the socialists."
A credit check is not the same as a background check.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside View Post
This is a typical liberal bs feel-good bill. Why shouldn't an employer know all about a prospective employee, including a credit check? Why shouldn't an employer have the ability to determine if a potential employee is responsible and ethical? Why shouldn't an employer have credit report can provide a snapshot of a person's economic life that may confirm or contradict their resume? You libs against that?
What is the relevance to the position?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 04:26 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,738,058 times
Reputation: 20674
In some cases, for some jobs, the employer's insurance requires them to perform initial background/credit checks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 04:27 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,207,906 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamencoFreak View Post
What does that mean?
It means that I agree with what the poster I quoted wrote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 04:28 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,262,817 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
In some cases, for some jobs, the employer's insurance requires them to perform initial background/credit checks.
That would be irrelevant if it were illegal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 04:29 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,738,058 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
Actually it is because entities needs your legal permission to pull your credit.
I suspect many applicants do not read the fine print on job applications.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top