Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It is becoming increasingly clear to Harrier that the evolutionists in this thread do not think critically about the theory of evolution.
Instead, they blindly believe what they are told without question.
This is evident by substituting a list of video and links for an answer asking why they believe that there is observable evidence for evolution, and in the case of another evolutionist, refusing to even attempt to provide an attempt at an answer.
If the answer to the "why" question is a list of stuff that other people have said or written, then there is no critical thinking going on - the people who think that an appeal to authority is an answer are committing a logical fallacy and indicating that they are unable to think for themselves, or provide any rational analytical defense for their beliefs
Really? Care to explain to me the mechanisms by which HPLC have detected subatomic particles? Because that is news to me.
As I said initially I'm not sure about subatomic particles, but we don't need a picture of small molecules to know we're working with them. There are other methods of detection. I imagine it's similar in those sciences. I'm in small molecules so that's all I can speak to.
Quote:
How about any EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE of the particles...have a list? Any of them, really. Without the mention of conceptualized representation, please.
How about measuring charge?
eta: I just googled how to measure subatomic particles and found this in Britannica. Is this what you have in mind?
"The sizes of atoms, nuclei, and nucleons are measured by firing a beam of electrons at an appropriate target. The higher the energy of the electrons, the farther they penetrate before being deflected by the electric charges within the atom. For example, a beam with an energy of a few hundred electron volts (eV) scatters from the electrons in a target atom. The way in which the beam is scattered (electron scattering) can then be studied to determine the general distribution of the atomic electrons."
^^^ Still not a single solitary shred of evidence for God's existence.
Does either side think we'll ever find proof of God's existence? The answer to that is no. Science says it won't find it because God doesn't exist. Religion says we won't find it because then there would be no need for faith. One thing both sides agree upon is we will never find proof of the existence of God so why try to make this a sticking point?
You believe in the creation story found in Genesis, correct? That there were dinosaurs roaming the Garden of Eden less than 20,000 years ago, yes?
No strawman here, right-winger. These are your actual beliefs.
Where in the bible does it say Adam and Eve walked with dinosaurs?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
