Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Britt, I'll give you a dollar if you promise to stop using the word "putative". Ten dollars if you promise not to start another thread through the rest of the month.
putative=1.
generally considered or reputed to be.
Odd term to use as the President is in fact the President and not ambiguously referred to as generally considered or reputed to be.
You are correct, you could, with the right equipment. Only thing is, you now need to spend another $100,000k to have it tested and certified by an EPA approved lab before you can use it! Now, of course you ran a computational fluid dynamics program when you designed your secondary combustion system to ensure that you're geting a good reburn, right? And evalutated the insulating properties of the firebrick and rockwool in the stove to ensure that your firebox stays hot enough for efficient combustion. And designed a nice airwash system to make sure your ceramic glass door front stays clean?
I know you're being humorous and facetious, but others may actually believe your response as real. We both know there is no regulation on home built.
I wanted to give those so fearful of the Government and the EPA an idea that there are lawful alternatives to these regulations...thus easing thier fears.
This only applies to new wood burning stoves. If you have a wood burning stove in your house that works fine, you will not have the government kicking in your door to arrest you. If you need to buy a new one, it will have to meet the tighter regulations. Not really a big deal unless you are a far right winger.
or a woodstove manufacturer forced to meet impossibly high mandates of emitting less than 4.5 grams/hour of particulates (set to go down to 1.3 g/h in 2019).
or a woodstove manufacturer forced to meet impossibly high mandates of emitting less than 4.5 grams/hour of particulates (set to go down to 1.3 g/h in 2019).
So wood burning stove manufacturers have never heard of technology? It isn't like this was a surprise, this is a regulation they knew was coming. Just like cars being regulated, we should be building cars that only get 8 mile to the gallon either.
Do you think this President has ever even seen a wood burning stove?
I would bet he has, who hasn't seen or used a wood burning stove at least once in their life, what does that have to do with reducing the pollution they admit.
So wood burning stove manufacturers have never heard of technology? It isn't like this was a surprise, this is a regulation they knew was coming. Just like cars being regulated, we should be building cars that only get 8 mile to the gallon either.
what technology should they use to get a particulate emissions rate of less than 4.5 grams per hour?
War on coal. Hates oil and most type of fossil fuels, lets the EPA run around imposing draconian rules.
How is he controlling the price again?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
