Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
T You can bet if it was proven that these fraudulent votes were for conservative candidates they would certainly care... but they know that's not the case.
Once you find the people who voted more than once, then you have voter fraud.
So far no there is no evidence any of these people voted more than once. Just their registration has the same values as people in other states since 2012. Maybe the first obvious question is...are these people who simply moved?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow
These people are nothing more than corrupt, pathetic trash. They don't care about fraud, they only win via fraud and lies. Look at the people in this thread who are DEFENDING voter fraud, they're all left wing idiots to the core.
This story isn't about some alleged instance of one woman voting 3 times, this is about hard evidence that proves that thousands of people have voted more than once in recent elections and these morons couldn't care less. You can bet if it was proven that these fraudulent votes were for conservative candidates they would certainly care... but they know that's not the case.
There's actual proof of a single voter voting multiple times. She was recently released from serving time for voter fraud, and was actually celebrated at a rally.
What did I tell you, Trace, even before I read through all the posts. Liberal hypocrites are so predictable!
Nothing but spin and defense of the indefensible. And, then there's this stretch...
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude
Nonsense.
If preventing that one prevents a dozen others who are eligible to vote from voting, it is by any objective measure a stupid trade.
How in the world do you go from one to a dozen? Is that supposed to be credible argument?
While no one wants any voter fraud to occur, it becomes more of a problem when it is perpetrated by election or party officials.
That's simply not true, and we know it's not true because if no one wanted voter fraud to occur it wouldn't yet we have hard proof that it does happen.
I repeat an earlier post, hypocrite. If it was a single republican doing this, they would be all over it, senate hearings, warrants, swat teams, you name it.
Whine, whine, whine..............
Instead of calling people names, you'd be taken more seriously if you put up an actual argument. You do know what an argument is, don't you? It's not just putting your lips together and blowing.
These results are only from a handful of states, states where Democrats aren't politically able to block joining this investigation.
I am talking about North Carolina specifically, there are about 4.3 million people who voted in 2012 in North Carolina. 35750 shared a name and birthday with one of the 120 million people who voted somewhere else.
35750/4300000 = .0083 Thus for every 1000 people who voted in North Carolina 8 had the same name and birthday as someone who voted in another state. Now do you think that is "thousands of people voting more then once" even though 34985/35750 did not share the last 4 SSN digets.
The fact is this gets brought up a lot and it is almost always all clerical errors.
Instead of calling people names, you'd be taken more seriously if you put up an actual argument. You do know what an argument is, don't you? It's not just putting your lips together and blowing.
We're all making an actual argument and it's based on hard facts, you obviously don't like that just like the rest of the left wing nut jobs who support voter fraud when it helps your candidates win elections.
I am talking about North Carolina specifically, there are about 4.3 million people who voted in 2012 in North Carolina. 35750 shared a name and birthday with one of the 120 million people who voted somewhere else.
35750/4300000 = .0083 Thus for every 1000 people who voted in North Carolina 8 had the same name and birthday as someone who voted in another state. Now do you think that is "thousands of people voting more then once" even though 34985/35750 did not share the last 4 SSN digets.
The fact is this gets brought up a lot and it is almost always all clerical errors.
I'm talking about NC as well...
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow
Did Romney win NC 100% in 2012? What about McCain in 2008?
I'll help you out, NC went Romney 50.6% to Obama 48.4% in 2012. A difference of about 100,000 votes total.
McCain lost NC to Obama in 2008 by 13,692 votes...
8 out of every 1000 votes can easily change an election in a state with 4.3 million residents.
That's simply not true, and we know it's not true because if no one wanted voter fraud to occur it wouldn't yet we have hard proof that it does happen.
Oh, please.
And if I say that no one wants murders to happen, you're going to come back and say, "That's untrue, because murders do happen, we know people get murdered everyday..." Blah, blah, blah. Yes, Virginia, there are criminals in the world, and crime does happen.
I would point out that voter suppression is actually more egregious than voter fraud. Because it is more effective at changing the outcome of an election, and because it denies people their rights. We have a history in this country of voter suppression, of using voter ID laws, poll taxes, and other tests, to deny people their right to vote. And we don't have a history of widespread voter fraud that ever changed the outcome of an election. And yet, somehow, conservatives have been bamboozled into thinking that voter ID laws needed to solve a non-existent problem.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.