Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-05-2014, 09:37 PM
 
Location: The Land of Reason
13,186 posts, read 12,361,153 times
Reputation: 3554

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by chad3 View Post
Obama has cut GW Bush's deficits in 1/2.

http://www.skymachines.com/US-Nation...ental-Term.htm



And the middle class pays more taxes because republicans block all middle class tax cuts.

Senate Republicans Block Middle Class Tax Cut

It's official: House Republicans just voted to block your tax cut to protect the*rich



And Paul Ryans only plan is to give the rich tax cuts (and not give tax cuts to anyone else, but hey that's trickle down economics.)

Ryan Proposes An Even Bigger Tax Cut For The Richest Americans | ThinkProgress
Ryan tax plan may lead to $200K cut for rich - Mar. 15, 2013

Wait I think that I can hear their collective
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2014, 09:38 PM
 
Location: The Land of Reason
13,186 posts, read 12,361,153 times
Reputation: 3554
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
I am sure Democrats had no plans to make George W. Bush a one term president. They also didn't oppose him. They also didn't tell him that they expected more say due to the close 2000 election. Obama is the first president to have the opposing party work against his plans that goes against the opposing party's ideology. Obama is special and must be treated with kid gloves.

Say what you want but they did not openly say it BEFORE he even sat in the white House!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2014, 09:38 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,122,843 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Cloture does not equal filibuster.
An obtuse quibble.

The clotures counted here are all instances where Republicans had indicated their intention to filibuster.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2014, 09:40 PM
 
Location: New Orleans, La. USA
6,354 posts, read 3,668,285 times
Reputation: 2523
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
You are lying.

You ask what did he spend money on -- then you switch it to "deficit." Obamacare will spend $2.5 Trillion in total by 2023...yes it raises taxes to offset it...


Obama criticized Bush for using continuing resolutions to fund the war. Obama said using continuing resolutions is a way to hide spending and deceive the public...that he wouldn't do it. He then came in and with a Democratic majority on the Senate (can't filibuster the budget) and Democrats in control of the House...Obama proceeded to do ALL of his spending through continuing resolutions... Obama is a fraud as much as Bush.

Obama is responsible for continuing any spending...and not going line by line...not cutting out waste, not reducing earmarks to 1994 levels by veto if necessary, not reducing no-bid contracts, not banning no-bid contracts above $25K, etc... Obama escalated the Afghanistan War...he could have saved more money by winding that down...Obama followed Bush's Iraq withdrawal, but in fact tried to extend it and has left more troops behind then Bush had planned. Obama has increased our foreign military bases and the amount of drones killing civilians - thus he could have saved more money by being less of a Bush.
Post some sources showing Obama's spending.

So far republicans posted the Obama stimulus, that's $831 billion.

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


What else did Obama spend money on?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2014, 09:43 PM
 
Location: The Land of Reason
13,186 posts, read 12,361,153 times
Reputation: 3554
Can anyone explain to me why the republicans were so agianst Obama plan to build up our infrastructure. Because of their fight against it, the folks in Pa have a gas tax increase. Thanks to Corbett and republican law fakers!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2014, 09:44 PM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,637 posts, read 16,658,275 times
Reputation: 6079
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
You know darn well Obama will spend more on both spending, and deficits, before he leaves the White House..
That may very well be true, infact im sure it will be true. The problem is we are debating right now, and as of right now, he has not done either.

The premise of the post I responded to was that he had already done so, and they were wrong, and you know that. Instead of admitting so, you deflect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2014, 10:04 PM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,637 posts, read 16,658,275 times
Reputation: 6079
Quote:
Originally Posted by simetime View Post
Can anyone explain to me why the republicans were so agianst Obama plan to build up our infrastructure. Because of their fight against it, the folks in Pa have a gas tax increase. Thanks to Corbett and republican law fakers!
Isnt it sad.

Republicans control the Pennsylvania House, Senate and Governorship and look what happens. An incumbent who loses in to poll to every Democrat up against him, which is sad considering in the poll I saw, there were 7 possible challengers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2014, 10:13 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,530 posts, read 33,418,414 times
Reputation: 7643
Quote:
Originally Posted by borregokid View Post
You want to know something. You wont be writing history and neither will the Tea Partiers. Most of you will be dead in 10 years sorry to say.
Why do the leftists think that the Tea Party (or TP supporters) are old?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2014, 10:13 PM
 
6,331 posts, read 5,224,807 times
Reputation: 1640
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
Why do the leftists think that the Tea Party (or TP supporters) are old?
Because 65+ is old.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2014, 10:13 PM
 
Location: New Orleans, La. USA
6,354 posts, read 3,668,285 times
Reputation: 2523
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Obama is using and supports Trickle Down economics.

After Obama was elected in 2008, Bernanke announced that he would start QE trickle down economics...Obama then nominated Bernanke to another term who pledged to do more aggressive QE trickle down economics at his hearing. Obama has since nominated Yellen, a lady who believes in strong QE trickle down economics.

Obama may use words against trickle down economics, but Obama as per usual is highly disingenuous. Obama's actions support trickle down.

How Quantitative Easing Helps the Rich and Soaks the Rest of Us - Reason.com

Bernanke's QE3; A Helping Hand To Wall St., Not Main St.

Druckenmiller: QE Is 'Trickle-Down' Economics, Great For Rich | FINalternatives

https://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs...cs_767342.html

Official:QE Is "The Greatest Backdoor Wall Street Bailout of All Time" Washington's Blog

Does Quantitative Easing Benefit the 99% or the 1%? | Zero Hedge

QE3 is 'trickle-down' economics for today: Pimco's Gross - The Tell - MarketWatch

Columnist confusion about the Fed, QE and Janet Yellen | AEIdeas

Does Quantitative Easing Mainly Help the Rich?

Quantitative Easing: The Liberal Version of Trickle Down - The Rush Limbaugh Show

LiveLeak.com - The Quantitative Trickle Down Circle Jerk
"Quantitative easing- a process in which the government purchases assets from banks and private companies in order to add a set amount of money into the economy. Often confused with printing money, quantitative easing uses the new electronically-created cash to purchase government bonds and other assets, rather than using newly minted money to pay off government debt."
Should There Be More Quantitative Easing?


It seems quantitative easing is done to keep interest rates low.
Quantitative easing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



I wonder why republicans hate quantitative easing so much ???????????

Republicans love to give money to the rich in ways like this,

Romney's Economic Plan Includes $6.6 Trillion Tax Cut For The Rich And Corporations | ThinkProgress



I wonder why republicans hate quantitative easing so much ???????????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top