Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yet he is a registered Republican. He must not have any faith in being actually attached to the Libertarian party, which would make Ron Paul an Armchair Libertarian.
Yet he is a registered Republican. He must not have any faith in being actually attached to the Libertarian party, which would make Ron Paul an Armchair Libertarian.
I understand you only see things in terms of party, so I figured you'd come back with that. But Ron Paul is a libertarian, but agree he isn't a registered Libertarian.
I understand you only see things in terms of party, so I figured you'd come back with that. But Ron Paul is a libertarian, but agree he isn't a registered Libertarian.
Yeah, let me know when Ron Paul actually supports the Libertarian party and registers as a Libertarian instead of being a registered Republican who pretends to be a Libertarian.
I understand you only see things in terms of party, so I figured you'd come back with that. But Ron Paul is a libertarian, but agree he isn't a registered Libertarian.
This is rich - coming from the poster who started this thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan
All if this talk about the Redskins made me think about the topic of armchair liberals. Does anyone here deal with armchair liberals on a daily basis? I live in a city full of them. Urban dictionary gives a pretty good definition for being urban dictionary "a person of liberal ideals who takes no action to realize them." I think the biggest "theme" for armchair liberals is how they think they are helping the poor simply because they vote Democrat, then they dust off their hands and congratulate themselves on being such great activists. I find them annoying, but harmless.
I would say a great many of the threads you start are of the us vs them category ~ divided strictly down party lines.
Yeah, let me know when Ron Paul actually supports the Libertarian party and registers as a Libertarian instead of being a registered Republican who pretends to be a Libertarian.
1) Differentiate between Libertarian and libertarian.
2) Ron Paul was the Libertarian Party's presidential candidate in 1988. Still an armchair libertarian though.
1) Differentiate between Libertarian and libertarian.
2) Ron Paul was the Libertarian Party's presidential candidate in 1988. Still an armchair libertarian though.
Ah yes, that one time he ran as a Libertarian for President, which he then ran back to the Republican party the moment that it was over.
Oh and the difference between Libertarian and libertarian is one is willing to invest their ideas within their party and the other likes to enjoy their armchairs while pretending they are real Libertarians.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"a person of liberal ideals who takes no action to realize them." I think the biggest "theme" for armchair liberals is how they think they are helping the poor simply because they vote Democrat, then they dust off their hands and congratulate themselves on being such great activists. I find them annoying, but harmless.
