Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-15-2014, 04:44 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,888,539 times
Reputation: 4585

Advertisements

Apple and Facebook to pay women to freeze their eggs for later pregnancies. RWers...??

Facebook, Apple Pay for Egg Freezing, Sperm Donors - ABC News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-15-2014, 05:04 AM
 
46,376 posts, read 27,210,243 times
Reputation: 11148
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This type of thing has never happened before....OMG OMG OMG RUN AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Oh wait...

In vitro fertilisation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Slow new day bob?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2014, 05:13 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,888,539 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This type of thing has never happened before....OMG OMG OMG RUN AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Oh wait...

In vitro fertilisation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Slow new day bob?
Think ... oh yeah, who pays for it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2014, 05:51 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,149,231 times
Reputation: 17865
I can care less what benefits two private companies have chosen to provide to their employees.

Quote:
Think ... oh yeah, who pays for it?
Won't be me because I don't have any Apple products nor do I use Facebook. I won't be buying any Apple products or using Facebook in the future either, this decision by them plays no role in that but if I was so inclined and found their decision to be against my moral views I could always take my business elsewhere.

That's the way it is supposed to work and should work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2014, 06:02 AM
 
43,791 posts, read 44,564,587 times
Reputation: 20623
I think it is a nice benefit for those women that it is relevant for. On the other hand, that opens up the debate on how old is really too old to have a child while still being physically able to fulfill easily the demands of motherhood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2014, 06:44 AM
 
Location: Camberville
15,880 posts, read 21,490,820 times
Reputation: 28240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chava61 View Post
I think it is a nice benefit for those women that it is relevant for. On the other hand, that opens up the debate on how old is really too old to have a child while still being physically able to fulfill easily the demands of motherhood.
This is a life saver for young women with cancer, autoimmune disease, or reproductive issues whose treatments destroy fertility.

When I was diagnosed with cancer, I went to a reproductive specialist to talk about my options. I was told that if I was a man, my insurance would cover sperm banking. If I was in a stable relationship, my insurance would cover embryo banking and retrieval. My insurance would not, however, cover egg banking. Since I was 23, right out of college, and a serious relationship had just ended a few months prior, I was single and would have to pay the full cost out of pocket - over $15,000 up front plus medication and yearly storage fees in the hundreds. It was something my specialist lamented and called ridiculous, hating to have to give this speech to most single women who came into his office due to cancer.

It's really horrible knowing the exact moment where you could no longer have a child and knowing that it was completely preventable. The $15,000 I couldn't afford on top of tens of thousand of dollars worth of copays, medications, and over the counter meds that the cancer itself cost me will now be $20-$40,000 to adopt while pregnancy is completely covered by my health plan.

Kudos to Apple and Facebook for making sure young women don't find themselves in the position I am now in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2014, 07:07 AM
 
20,495 posts, read 12,421,388 times
Reputation: 10297
that is wonderful! kudos to these companies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2014, 12:17 PM
 
43,791 posts, read 44,564,587 times
Reputation: 20623
Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
This is a life saver for young women with cancer, autoimmune disease, or reproductive issues whose treatments destroy fertility.

When I was diagnosed with cancer, I went to a reproductive specialist to talk about my options. I was told that if I was a man, my insurance would cover sperm banking. If I was in a stable relationship, my insurance would cover embryo banking and retrieval. My insurance would not, however, cover egg banking. Since I was 23, right out of college, and a serious relationship had just ended a few months prior, I was single and would have to pay the full cost out of pocket - over $15,000 up front plus medication and yearly storage fees in the hundreds. It was something my specialist lamented and called ridiculous, hating to have to give this speech to most single women who came into his office due to cancer.

It's really horrible knowing the exact moment where you could no longer have a child and knowing that it was completely preventable. The $15,000 I couldn't afford on top of tens of thousand of dollars worth of copays, medications, and over the counter meds that the cancer itself cost me will now be $20-$40,000 to adopt while pregnancy is completely covered by my health plan.

Kudos to Apple and Facebook for making sure young women don't find themselves in the position I am now in.
It is not a life-safer but I do agree that it is important option for a young women who has a serious illness like cancer that undergoes the chemo which would destroy their option of having their own biological child in the future. But when one can't have their own biological child, there are other options such as adoption, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2014, 12:35 PM
 
3,445 posts, read 6,075,792 times
Reputation: 6133
Im surprised those companies aren't giving out awards and perks for having an abortion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2014, 12:36 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,861 posts, read 24,160,330 times
Reputation: 15143
WTF is this thread doing in this forum?

Hey bob - the Health & Wellness forum is over there ---> //www.city-data.com/forum/health-wellness/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:05 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top