Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-22-2014, 06:42 PM
 
Location: Ohio
2,801 posts, read 2,310,926 times
Reputation: 1654

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
What is this "pension companies" thing you are talking about?

Pensions are provided by EMPLOYERS. They are funded by and operated by those employers.

There is nobody in the business of "pensions".
You are wrong in the bolded text.
Our current "pension" is operated by an investment company.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-22-2014, 07:02 PM
 
Location: Florida
33,572 posts, read 18,174,016 times
Reputation: 15551
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Sure it's earned. But the employee did not contribute to it.
And employer pension funds are never guaranteed and can be changed, ended, modified at any point in time.
If the worker did not work , it would not be contributed.. it is an earned benefit.


Wrong. It is guaranteed until Obama changed the legislation and allowed the plans to cut benefits. It is the same as the bank telling depositors that their money is covered by the FDIC. If the bank goes under and the FDIC cannot cover the money that depositors placed into the banks, the FDIC could be changed by our legislators to only give partial payment to the depositor.

This action has opened many doors and can change any promise or guarantee to anyone . Our legislators can do whatever they want with the people's money.

The Pension Guarantee Corporation has been overridden by Obama signing the legislation to cut pensions .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2014, 07:08 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,977,520 times
Reputation: 7315
"The Pension Guarantee Corporation has been overridden by Obama signing the legislation to cut pensions."

Long overdue. Longer life expectancy overwhelmed this "corps" ability, long-term, to keep up with defaults.

We need pensions restructured via normal bankruptcy reorg processes, like any other debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2014, 07:20 PM
 
Location: Florida
33,572 posts, read 18,174,016 times
Reputation: 15551
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
"The Pension Guarantee Corporation has been overridden by Obama signing the legislation to cut pensions."

Long overdue. Longer life expectancy overwhelmed this "corps" ability, long-term, to keep up with defaults.

We need pensions restructured via normal bankruptcy reorg processes, like any other debt.
And should the FDIC die too. Is that long overdue? Should we kill all promised to those trusting individuals ? Should savers be given a portion of their money back too because the banks failed? Is that your belief. I disagree vehemently.

The government has no right to steal peoples money through legislation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2014, 08:38 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,977,520 times
Reputation: 7315
The FDIC has never been insolvent. The Pension Guarantee Corp is on the verge of it. Apples and oranges.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2014, 09:18 PM
 
Location: On a windy ridge in ID
185 posts, read 253,278 times
Reputation: 249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
And how long would it take to give 201 briefings? More or less 201 hours maybe?

Your idea would guarantee they'd be voting on a bill they never read. Rand Paul said they should be given one day per 25 pages. How low is that bar in your view? I think it's a good idea.
As long as it's read, 25 pages a day is a good start. It takes as long as it takes.

Look, I'm reasonable. They are busy, I get it. But the "I didn't read it" defense is downright insulting. I can't believe they admit to it and get a pass on that BS. If the constituency approves- great, I voted yea. If the constituency doesn't approve- I didn't read it. And we sit back and let it happen with nary a peep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2014, 04:28 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
But it does set a precedent..and public pensions and SS are on the back burners don't forget.
I don't think anyone under 50 expect to receive 100% of their SS, so there is nothing new going on. People like you are strange because you go on about how we need to cut spending, and when spending is cut, you can't stop complaining about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2014, 04:43 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoilers4me View Post
As long as it's read, 25 pages a day is a good start. It takes as long as it takes.

Look, I'm reasonable. They are busy, I get it. But the "I didn't read it" defense is downright insulting. I can't believe they admit to it and get a pass on that BS. If the constituency approves- great, I voted yea. If the constituency doesn't approve- I didn't read it. And we sit back and let it happen with nary a peep.
I have not heard them use it as a defense, I pointed it out myself. The bill is thousands of pages long, and they had only 48 hours to read it, and I happen to know it is impossible, so they passed a bill they never read. As a matter of fact the Congress does no seem to feel the need to make any excuses for passing it.

Last edited by Finn_Jarber; 12-23-2014 at 05:26 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2014, 04:50 AM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,060,276 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
This was a very bi-partisan bill. It does not pass without a lot of support from both parties......but go ahead and argue which party was only 40% responsible with the other 60%.
So was the Iraq War resolution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2014, 05:22 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,392,274 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
The FDIC has never been insolvent. The Pension Guarantee Corp is on the verge of it. Apples and oranges.

That won't bother Taratova. He/she hates socialism, except when folks have "earned" it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top