Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-03-2015, 03:37 PM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,761,687 times
Reputation: 15482

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM05 View Post

hahaha - So worried = Wait and SEE
Not worried, just curious.

Will revisit this thread after the supremes release their decision.

Although I will say I think this teasing is rather fourth-grade of you. If you have something to say, say it. Otherwise, don't bother. I seriously doubt you have any inside track to anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-03-2015, 03:57 PM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,288,761 times
Reputation: 5565
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM05 View Post

hahaha - So worried = Wait and SEE
I don't think any of us are worried. We have long seen the handwriting on the wall and can tell which way the wind is blowing is all .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2015, 04:29 PM
 
23 posts, read 31,350 times
Reputation: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by arjay57 View Post
The government has no business sticking its big snout into when consenting adults can get married.
What about 2 or more consenting adults?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2015, 04:37 PM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,386,924 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris J Lumbergh View Post
What about 2 or more consenting adults?
polygamy How to have your Kate and Edith too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2015, 04:37 PM
 
Location: San Antonio Texas
11,431 posts, read 19,007,279 times
Reputation: 5224
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris J Lumbergh View Post
What about 2 or more consenting adults?
Well, if you can find a way where a bunch of barefoot pregnant women don't each qualify for SS and Medicare benefits all because of marriage to the SAME man (wage earner), fine with me.

Isn't that the way that they married in the bible? Why would bible thumpers be against it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2015, 04:45 PM
 
11,046 posts, read 5,275,714 times
Reputation: 5253
since when the FEDS gets involved in the definition of marriage? this was NEVER a federal issue for over 200 years.

Quote:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people

A few activist judges are taking over and damn the states and damn the people of the states.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2015, 04:49 PM
 
Location: Tip of the Sphere. Just the tip.
4,540 posts, read 2,770,924 times
Reputation: 5277
Why do "conservatives" hate the 14th amendment?

Quote:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws
Ok, that was a rhetorical question.

'Conservatives' hate the 14th amendment because it guarantees rights to people that 'conservatives' see as subhuman. That's why the Tea Party wants to repeal the 14th amendment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2015, 04:54 PM
 
11,046 posts, read 5,275,714 times
Reputation: 5253
Quote:
Originally Posted by turkey-head View Post
Why do "conservatives" hate the 14th amendment?



Ok, that was a rhetorical question.

'Conservatives' hate the 14th amendment because it guarantees rights to people that 'conservatives' see as subhuman. That's why the Tea Party wants to repeal the 14th amendment.



the equal protection clause was NEVER made for gay marriage.


Equal Protection laws doesn't mean EVERYBODY is equal and everybody should get equal pay under the law.


Liberals have taken the 14th amendment and want to apply their liberal agenda on everything.

Last edited by Hellion1999; 02-03-2015 at 05:04 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2015, 04:59 PM
 
11,046 posts, read 5,275,714 times
Reputation: 5253
The Equal Protection Clause does two things. First it applies the 1st 10 amendments to the states, which up until that point it had not done.
Second if applies all Federal equally across all states, mainly arising from the Dredd Scott ruling in which citizenship requirements were not applied equally to all (This is why Scott was returned to MO as a slave, since he was not deemed to be a Citizen while residing freely in IL).

What the 14th Amendment does not do, is apply State Laws across State Lines. Each State still has its own Sovereign right to make its own laws in accordance with Article I sections 8-11, and 9th and 10th Amendments. If it was intended to apply laws equally across state lines, all laws of all states would be required to be uniform to afford this. The language of the 14th Amendment does not in any respect supersede the 10th Amendment reserving rights not outlined in Article Sections 8-11 of powers given to the Federal Government or Forbidden by the States, are reserved by the states and People Respectively.

Since the regulation of Marriage is not a power delegated to the Federal Government, nor is it forbidden to the States, nor outlined in any other Amendment, that power is hence reserved by the States First IAW the 10th Amendment. Since the 14th Amendment applies ONLY Federal Laws equally among the States (including the Bill Of Rights) this does not violate the equal protection Clause of the 14th amendment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2015, 05:06 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,107,555 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellion1999 View Post
The Equal Protection Clause does two things. First it applies the 1st 10 amendments to the states, which up until that point it had not done.
Second if applies all Federal equally across all states, mainly arising from the Dredd Scott ruling in which citizenship requirements were not applied equally to all (This is why Scott was returned to MO as a slave, since he was not deemed to be a Citizen while residing freely in IL).

What the 14th Amendment does not do, is apply State Laws across State Lines. Each State still has its own Sovereign right to make its own laws in accordance with Article I sections 8-11, and 9th and 10th Amendments. If it was intended to apply laws equally across state lines, all laws of all states would be required to be uniform to afford this. The language of the 14th Amendment does not in any respect supersede the 10th Amendment reserving rights not outlined in Article Sections 8-11 of powers given to the Federal Government or Forbidden by the States, are reserved by the states and People Respectively.

Since the regulation of Marriage is not a power delegated to the Federal Government, nor is it forbidden to the States, nor outlined in any other Amendment, that power is hence reserved by the States First IAW the 10th Amendment. Since the 14th Amendment applies ONLY Federal Laws equally among the States (including the Bill Of Rights) this does not violate the equal protection Clause of the 14th amendment.
Um, I think you need to re-read the 14th Amendment. Here's the Equal Protection Clause:

"nor shall any State ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment absolutely regulates State laws - including State marriage laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top