Barbara Lee says global warming will increase prostitution (dollars, economy, money)

[wildflower82]

Originally Posted by chucksnee

You mean like this thread?

//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...l-arizona.html

Strange when lefties/dems obsess over righties that most righties/cons will only have vague knowledge of, my gues is they are sent emails and links that feed their insecurities and fantasies....

Double standard....of course not...

However, I'll bump the thread so we can see what you do/say in that thread....

Good job! There was no obsessing on that thread......none at all!

[wildflower82]

Originally Posted by Ultor

Only the Queen groupies:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMnjF1O4eH0

promiscuous women........come in all shapes and sizes, don't be silly!

Bet AC/DC fans could warm the earth faster!

[Spartacus713]

This the kind of outrageous hyperbole that we have seen time and again from the politically contrived AGW alarmism movement.

[Roadking2003]

Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest

In a sense she is correct, all the global warming schemes will result in an increase of lawmakers prostituting themselves.

[Ultor]

Originally Posted by 3~Shepherds

promiscuous women........come in all shapes and sizes, don't be silly!

Bet AC/DC fans could warm the earth faster!

97% of rock fans agree that only fat-bottomed girls can cause earthquakes.

As far as warming goes, AC/DC cheated when they built that highway to hell.

[burdell]

Of course she didn't actually say WILL increase prostitution as alleged but no sense letting facts get in the way of good hyperbole, eh?

[wildflower82]

Originally Posted by Roadking2003

The thought of Hillary, Boxer, Pelosi and Feinstein is disturbing. Although they are most likely the biggest warhawks and people responsible for wars in the ME. I believe all of them sent President Bush into the realms of hell and he didn't even realized he was played.

[chucksnee]

Originally Posted by burdell

Of course she didn't actually say WILL increase prostitution as alleged but no sense letting facts get in the way of good hyperbole, eh?

That's the entire point that fails to continue to go over the heads of lefties...

If it was a rightie....well then that's the gospel...period end of story....that what they meant, nothing more nothing less.....

If we were to take people at their words....

[WilliamSmyth]

So strange that the following line in the bill is the focus of attack.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-...lution/29/text

"Whereas food insecure women with limited socioeconomic resources may be vulnerable to situations such as sex work, transactional sex, and early marriage that put them at risk for HIV, STIs, unplanned pregnancy, and poor reproductive health"

Is there any dispute that what was stated is true?

[HappyTexan]

Originally Posted by WilliamSmyth

So strange that the following line in the bill is the focus of attack.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-...lution/29/text

"Whereas food insecure women with limited socioeconomic resources may be vulnerable to situations such as sex work, transactional sex, and early marriage that put them at risk for HIV, STIs, unplanned pregnancy, and poor reproductive health"

Is there any dispute that what was stated is true?

Oh there's more to it than that sentence.

This is her opening summary and she doesn't limit it to women in the US.
She wants change for women globally because climate change will force them into prostitution so they can buy food and water.
But if we allocate money to educate them on climate change then these women won't become prostitutes

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-...-resolution/29
Recognizes: (1) the disparate impacts of climate change on women and the efforts of women globally to address it, and (2) the need for balanced participation of men and women in climate change adaptation and mitigation efforts.

Encourages the use of gender-sensitive frameworks in developing climate change policies.