Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-23-2015, 05:59 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
90% of doctors and clinics are not charging that.....those 'type' of charges are usually isolated to hospitals

people ADVOCATING for singlepayer...NEVER take into the FACT that medicine and medical care COSTS MONEY...they think they can DIRECT the cost down..in an ever EXPANDING realm

things are expensive

for example the average hospital uses a lot of electricity...about 400,000 a month...thats 5 million dollars in electric costs yearly.....you are not going to cut that piece of overhead with singlepayer
I am actually not advocating anything, I am just pointing out a simple fact that our prices are ridiculously high. Hospitals in other countries use electric too, but they don't waste money like we do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-23-2015, 06:01 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
singlepayer( ie government paid and controlled) would be the worst option... look at all the problems with the VA...
The conservative argument for single payer is that it would lift a huge burden off the shoulders of employers who currently spend a lot of money in providing insurance for their employees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2015, 06:16 AM
 
Location: Phoenix
30,390 posts, read 19,184,321 times
Reputation: 26297
There are plenty of countries such as France & Spain getting better health results at 1/3 the cost of what we have in the USA...we can model off of their systems. The problem is that too many people are getting rich under the current system...they will have to adjust for the benefit of the group for us to get it right.

The other thing is taking personal responsibility for keeping fit and not eating yourself to obesity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2015, 06:21 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,496,494 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
The conservative argument for single payer is that it would lift a huge burden off the shoulders of employers who currently spend a lot of money in providing insurance for their employees.
correct it would be a burden off the employers...but that burden would be transferred to the taxpayers....and the average taxpayer cant afford an added 20-50k tax bill
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2015, 06:24 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
correct it would be a burden off the employers...but that burden would be transferred to the taxpayers....and the average taxpayer cant afford an added 20-50k tax bill
Taxes going up by $20 000 to $50 000 is just pure nonsense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2015, 06:28 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,554,711 times
Reputation: 24780
Question How can the US afford a single-payer system?

By not waging any more mindless, losing wars in the middle east.

The $6 trillion for Iraq and Afghanistan could have funded health care forever.

Why do we spend so much on fruitless overseas destruction and death while refusing to spend taxpayer dollars on projects that would benefit taxpayers?

The Iraq War Could Cost More Than $6 Trillion - Business Insider

Iraq war cost: $6 trillion. What else could have been done? - latimes

US Wars in Afghanistan, Iraq to Cost $6 trillion | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization

Iraq War Will End Up Costing At Least $6 Trillion - Mic
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2015, 06:29 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,496,494 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Traveler View Post
There are plenty of countries such as France & Spain getting better health results at 1/3 the cost of what we have in the USA...we can model off of their systems. The problem is that too many people are getting rich under the current system...they will have to adjust for the benefit of the group for us to get it right.

The other thing is taking personal responsibility for keeping fit and not eating yourself to obesity.
think again

Quote:
The Poor Get the Worst Health Care.
Translated Monday 29 October 2007, by Gene Zbikowski

An edifying INSEE study confirms that the poorest households suffer discrimination in access to health care, following a study on health care conducted

The least one can say is that the INSEE study entitled “The Health of the Very Poor,†which was published yesterday, comes at just the right moment. Right in the middle of the debate on the social security budget bill in the French National Assembly, right in the middle of the battle against medical co-payments, the day after the demonstration by medical students, the health care study conducted between 2002-2003 with a sample of 40,000 people confirms the discrimination in health care access suffered by the poorest French households.

A Greater Proportion Go to the Hospital.

The French poor and their children do not go to see the family doctor very often, and they see specialists even less. Some 21% of the under-50s did not see the doctor, as against 17% of that age group in the rest of the population. And even when they do go to the doctor, “it’s often when the condition is already serious,†noted Thibaut de Saint Pol, an INSEE sociologist. A disproportionate proportion of the most fragile households also go to the hospital. About 19% of them had been hospitalized in the year preceding the study, against 16% for the rest of the population. As concerns specific conditions, tooth decay is at the head of the list. Among the poor, 11% suffer from tooth decay against 6% of the rest of the population. The same goes for poor French children: they are less likely to benefit from orthodontic care (6% against 10% for other children) and they also suffer more from tooth decay, 6% against 2%. These children are also more likely to be asthmatic, 6% against 4%. The poor also suffer more from rheumatism, varicose veins, osteo-articulatory

The Poor Get the Worst Health Care. - L'Humanité in English
french UHC....going bankrupt

-----------------------
The French health care system is going bankrupt. The public insurance fund has been in deficit every year since 1986
in France you basically get it from a private doctor, clinic or hospital. They compete for business, so they have a strong incentive to provide good care.

You then pay them, but are partly reimbursed by the government, by about 75%. The rest of the money either comes out of your pocket, or your own private medical insurance.

Over 80% of French people have private health insurance to cover this top-up.

=====================================

german UHC...going bankrupt:

PUBLIC GERMAN acute hospitals face bankruptcy
Some German acute hospitals face bankruptcy in 2009, warns Hermann Thiel, at German healthcare property consultancy Terranus.de. Other reports suggest that a third of all publicly owned hospitals will go out of business over the next few years.

Thiel says that the going will get tough as the changes to the system of reimbursements enters its final phase. He predicts that the financial squeeze is likely to lead to more acute hospitals being taken over by private operators. The changes mean that hospitals have had to introduce DRG and can not simply increase their debts.
--------------
demand for private health insurance in Germany is growing, alone in 2004 around 400.000 Germans have chosen one of the private coverage schemes. Between 2002 and 2003, about 300.000 of statutory insured persons have taken out outpatient supplementary private insurance, while in the same period, around 242.000 have taken out optional hospital benefits. We argue that perceived quality of private and public health care, insurance premiums and income are among the determinants of this growing demand. This study is the first in Germany that moves from theoretical to empirical framework. It uses economic modelling to analyze the effects of these determinants on the probability of purchasing private health insurance. Economic modelling states, demand for private health insurance is demand for high health care quality. The model was developed taking into consideration the unobserved endogeneity and heterogeneity. Results support the hypothesis that the demand for private health insurance is driven by the quality gap between both insurance sectors.

=========================

greek UHC.....going bankrupt
british healthcare.....severe cutbacks, on the verge of failing
canadian UHCis even starting to....PRIVITIZE....In Canada, a move toward a private healthcare option - latimes
swiss health care......Swiss health care is predominantly private. Individuals are required to buy insurance and almost all of them do. Private companies compete to provide insurance, and there are subsidies for lower income buyers. The insurance is individually owned, personal and portable.
Despite competition, choice, private ownership and portability, the Swiss system is still very bureaucratic – perhaps as much as or more so than our own. It has mandated benefits, price controls on providers and other regulations that make it hard for entrepreneurs to solve problems.

swedish health care....For decades, Sweden has been the global bastion of socialized health care. In many ways, it still is. But as countries the world over struggle with rapidly changing technologies, spiking medical costs, rising demands for service with noncorresponding appetites for increased fees or taxation, Sweden is increasingly turning to the private sector to reduce the burden on a health care system at risk of being crushed under its own weight.
"Many of the developments in the last 15 years have been about going from a government-funded system to a more open system that includes the private sector," says Dr. Birger Forsberg, a professor of international health at the Karolinksa Institute medical school who also advises Stockholm on health care policies.

The Scandanavian model of a welfare state built on high taxation is known the world over. In fact, Sweden's success at adopting a public–private hybrid was cited by the Supreme Court of Canada in its 2005 decision to strike down prohibitions against private health care insurance in Quebec, saying that countries such as Sweden and Germany, that allow private insurance, have successfully delivered medical services that are superior to and more affordable than services available in Canada.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2015, 06:33 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,496,494 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Taxes going up by $20 000 to $50 000 is just pure nonsense.
how do you figure its nonsense

our population is 320 million

to cover 320 million with an 80/20 government insurance (medicare for all) would have a yearly cost of about 3 trillion

to cover 320 million people with 100% coverage...would have a yearly cost of about 6 trillion


there are only 150 million tax filers, of which less than 80 million have a positive tax liability...(as per the IRS 47% if filers have a zero to negative tax liability)

3 trillion divided by 80 million is 26k
6 trillion divided by 80 million is 52k

the math is true
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2015, 06:35 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,496,494 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
By not waging any more mindless, losing wars in the middle east.

The $6 trillion for Iraq and Afghanistan could have funded health care forever.
nope not forever..not even a decade

that 6 trillion would fund it for 1-2 years(depending on the coverage)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2015, 06:55 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,765,593 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by FallsAngel View Post
Technically, no, the US does not have the highest obesity rate in the world. It has the highest rate of first world countries, but several others are close behind.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publicat.../2228rank.html
Come on now. American Samoa has a population of 55,000+/-. The U.S. has many, many suburbs larger than American Samoa. The U.S. gives American Samoa $140 million a year in aid. As an aside, all healthcare in American Samoa are government owned and operated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top