Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 25 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,566 posts, read 16,552,753 times
Reputation: 6043
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnitegracie
No, the point is, a "News" organization printed a hit piece against a Presidential Candidate and claimed that the information was collected by a non-partisan vendor in Florida. That statement was proved to be a lie, when it was confirmed that American Bridge Pac, the opposition research arm of the Democratic party, provided the research to NYT for the sole purpose of using the NYT as a "legitimate" outlet to distribute mudslinging from the left.
In other words, this is just more validation that the NYT is nothing more than Pravda for the left.
You didnt write the post I responded to, so in reality, you dont know what his or her point was.
there are 2 more problems with your argument
The first being the article mentions its source as the Miami Herald and the actual Florida database, Not American Bridge. And I see no where that they even claim the Miami Herald was impartial, let alone American Bridge.
Second, American bridge is not the opposition arm or the Democratic Party anymore than America Rising is the opposition of the Republican Party(they have had articles published by the Times as well as the Post).
American Bridge has never claimed to be anything other than Progressive
Quote:
Who We Are
American Bridge 21st Century is a progressive research and communications organization committed to holding Republicans accountable for their words and actions and helping you ascertain when Republican candidates are pretending to be something they’re not.
You didnt write the post I responded to, so in reality, you dont know what his or her point was.
there are 2 more problems with your argument
The first being the article mentions its source as the Miami Herald and the actual Florida database, Not American Bridge. And I see no where that they even claim the Miami Herald was impartial, let alone American Bridge.
Second, American bridge is not the opposition arm or the Democratic Party anymore than America Rising is the opposition of the Republican Party(they have had articles published by the Times as well as the Post).
American Bridge has never claimed to be anything other than Progressive
Yep. It may even be better now than it used to be.
Wait for 20 years from now (if either of us are still around) where they will be dragging up texts, tweets etc. from some college kid that is now running for office.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 25 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,566 posts, read 16,552,753 times
Reputation: 6043
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd
are you defending NYT in this????
seriously?
2 flaws with your argument
1. The Person I responded to made a false claim that i then debunked by simply reading the article.
Whether im defending the times or not does not change the fact that the person I responded to was wrong.
2. You put forth nothing to negate the fact that News papers, during the primary process, do indeed do this kind of reporting on both sides as I showed when it came to then candidate Obama and his parking tickets.
Next time, debate the issue instead of one liners that add nothing to the discussion.
Lordy, lordy. This just shows how petty politics have become.
eeee....
not really...
this just shows how petty the democrats and their Prog allies are.
nothing about this speaks to "politics" in general. period.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.