Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-15-2015, 11:37 AM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,643,000 times
Reputation: 21097

Advertisements

A strong indication on the "transparency" of a future Hillary Clinton Administration. i.e. None

Hillary Clinton campaign denies access to DailyMail.com political editor as Monday's pool reporter in New Hampshire


Unhappy King
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-15-2015, 11:44 AM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,080,699 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
A strong indication on the "transparency" of a future Hillary Clinton Administration. i.e. None. Unhappy King
Yeah, yeah, we get it. You're just going to start thread after thread so you can use (what you mistakenly think is) a clever use of the word King as associated with Hillary. It wore thin after the first half dozen threads...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2015, 11:48 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,222,338 times
Reputation: 17209
It is a bit like saying poisonous rattle snake. It's sort of redundant. Most know to stay away even without the descriptive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2015, 11:48 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Remember the Obama administration did that with Fox ? And remember the rest of the pool stood by Fox until the administration relented.

From the OP link:
The pool had been formed at the request of the Clinton campaign, with one reporter, photographer and videographer traveling with the presidential hopeful each day.

The pool works by correspondents choosing a rotation of reporters, and the campaign is not supposed to interfere with who is chosen or have a say as to who will travel for the day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2015, 11:53 AM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,643,000 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
Yeah, yeah, we get it. You're just going to start thread after thread so you can use (what you mistakenly think is) a clever use of the word King as associated with Hillary. It wore thin after the first half dozen threads...
Yet you click on topic and respond. Proof enough that it does not wear thin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2015, 11:57 AM
 
13,303 posts, read 7,873,743 times
Reputation: 2144
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
A strong indication on the "transparency" of a future Hillary Clinton Administration. i.e. None

Hillary Clinton campaign denies access to DailyMail.com political editor as Monday's pool reporter in New Hampshire


Unhappy King
She got talons.

She has triumphed over man-a-cures for a long time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2015, 12:01 PM
 
12,282 posts, read 13,244,094 times
Reputation: 4985
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
Yeah, yeah, we get it. You're just going to start thread after thread so you can use (what you mistakenly think is) a clever use of the word King as associated with Hillary. It wore thin after the first half dozen threads...
Agreed. Bush was the Emperor with no brain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2015, 12:09 PM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,643,000 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
Agreed. Bush was the Emperor with no brain.
I agree. So which is more dangerous?

  • Dimwit who makes no bones where he stands.
  • Smart person who "pretends" to be something she isn't.


Your choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2015, 12:25 PM
 
12,282 posts, read 13,244,094 times
Reputation: 4985
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
I agree. So which is more dangerous?

  • Dimwit who makes no bones where he stands.
  • Smart person who "pretends" to be something she isn't.


Your choice.
That is it. Dimwit didn't know what to say or do. Cheney led him by his nose.Remember he was the DECIDER.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2015, 12:29 PM
 
Location: Annandale, VA
5,094 posts, read 5,175,972 times
Reputation: 4233
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
That is it. Dimwit didn't know what to say or do. Cheney led him by his nose.Remember he was the DECIDER.

I prefer a leader who listens to his more experienced advisors rather than some community organizer or glorified housewife with no experience who pretend they have the answers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top