Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What court does one go to to overturn a Supreme Court ruling?
They can be impeached, tried, and removed from the bench. Furthermore, since Kennedy, Sotomayor, Kagan, Breyer, and Ginsburg made law and their decision is unconstitutional, no one has any obligation to abide by it. Nullification and non-violent civil disobedience are viable options. The Constitution is the highest law of the land, not 5 unelected tyrannical judges.
We should all be concerned about nononsenseguy's blood pressure today, based on what he has been writing.
Well it is nice that you're looking out for the guy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by helenejen
Sorry. Close reading can be difficult for some.
Well you are right that you offer conjecture.
Oh really?
Yeah, all those I's don't make your post all about you. No, not at all.
You too, sweetie. After all we are living in a better United States of America today. Who wouldn't be having a mirific day!
Aren't we all offering conjecture? This is an opinion forum, no? I seldom look at it as any more than that--or entertainment. There are some posters who have given me a lot to think about. But mostly it's just back and forth opinions.
I can't say that I ever agree with you much, but I will say I like reading your posts. Your tone quite often makes me smile--in a good kind of way. Seriously. I honestly do like sarcastic/satirical tone when it's done well. Pity we seldom agree, though. Regardless, good writing style is good writing style...
They can be impeached, tried, and removed from the bench.
Absolutely. At the very least, this ruling can be ignored.
Quite frankly there should also be a motion to censure Roberts
because he is the chief justice who allowed them to rule on the case.
That is a dereliction of duty on his part.
He is also impeachable.
Well it is nice that you're looking out for the guy.
Yes, I wasn't joking about that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisC
Aren't we all offering conjecture? This is an opinion forum, no? I seldom look at it as any more than that--or entertainment. There are some posters who have given me a lot to think about. But mostly it's just back and forth opinions.
Well 'conjecture' is more of a pejorative than 'opinion.'
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisC
I can't say that I ever agree with you much, but I will say I like reading your posts. Your tone quite often makes me smile--in a good kind of way. Seriously. I honestly do like sarcastic/satirical tone when it's done well. Too bad we always disagree, though. Well, almost always. Regardless, good writing style is good writing style...
Proof again that to most of the Lefties here, (and more than a few of the Fundies, BTW), the end justifies the means.
Either the bills will come due, and sanity will again rule, or the entire system will be corrupted and destroyed in the pursuit of expediency, and that would be the biggest tragedy of all.
What you mean is we will continue to see articles from people whining that they can no longer deny others the same rights they enjoy.
You make no sense because in the states involved in Obergefell, no one had a right to a sodomite "marriage", therefore no one was being the denied the right to a sodomite "marriage" enjoyed by anyone else.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
