Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-30-2015, 08:41 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,080,948 times
Reputation: 17865

Advertisements

The tax credit for business's will drop from 30% to 10% and residential installations will drop from 30% to 0%. Without those subsidies the industry is toast.


Quote:
Solar Industry Must Support ITC Extension or Face Potentially Dire Consequences - Renewable Energy World

Resch laid out an eye-opening scenario if the solar ITC expires: “The reality is that we will lose 100,000 jobs if we lose the ITC — and these are conservative numbers. Ninety percent of solar companies will go out of business.”

Last edited by thecoalman; 08-30-2015 at 09:34 PM.. Reason: Forgot link
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-30-2015, 08:53 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,559 posts, read 37,160,046 times
Reputation: 14017
Yeah right, meanwhile big oil will receive 46 billion in subsidies....Tax breaks and incentives for the big oil companies began in 1916, and continue today....What is wrong with this picture?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2015, 08:58 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,829,035 times
Reputation: 6509
Good, no need for tax payers to fund tax credits for a technology that damages the environment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2015, 09:04 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,559 posts, read 37,160,046 times
Reputation: 14017
Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
Good, no need for tax payers to fund tax credits for a technology that damages the environment.
I agree, 46 billion is a lot of money out of tax payer's pockets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2015, 09:09 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,829,035 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
I agree, 46 billion is a lot of money out of tax payer's pockets.
Letting people keep some of the money the earned is not a subsidie.

Did you know the government makes more from the sale of oil products than the oil companies? They actually have a very low profit margin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2015, 09:11 PM
 
1,248 posts, read 1,384,517 times
Reputation: 639
It was inevitable. most citizens are too broke and too stupid to invest in Solar products. I want some Solar stuff right now but I am too broke for it. Everybody should have solar panels on there roofs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2015, 09:17 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,829,035 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by RegalSin View Post
It was inevitable. most citizens are too broke and too stupid to invest in Solar products. I want some Solar stuff right now but I am too broke for it. Everybody should have solar panels on there roofs.
If you really wanted clean power you would promote nuclear. it is clean, cheap and safe.

Investing in solar only made sense because the government was voting so much of the bill. The savings just don't pan out for the majority of homes, especially when the government subsidies stop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2015, 09:21 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,559 posts, read 37,160,046 times
Reputation: 14017
It makes sense for me....I'm over 90% green energy...Eat your heart out.

Last edited by sanspeur; 08-30-2015 at 09:36 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2015, 09:27 PM
 
34,068 posts, read 17,102,875 times
Reputation: 17215
The 30% credit will , no doubt, get extended long after 2016.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2015, 09:30 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,080,948 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Yeah right, meanwhile big oil will receive 46 billion in subsidies....
The oil/gas industry gets about 4 or 5 billion a year. To put this amount into perspective it's equal to the revenue generated by Exxon itself in a few days. Per unit it comes out to fractions of one penny per gallon, take it away and it would be like nothing ever happened. They do not depend on that subsidy to exist, it's irrelevant to the market becsue it such small amount relative to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top