Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-10-2016, 01:59 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,068,169 times
Reputation: 17865

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dv1033 View Post
Nope. You will pay for both roads and mass transit. I prefer we create separate funds and stop robbing one to pay for another.

LOL... there is only one fund being robbed here. I'm all for separate funds, paid for by those using that service. I'm willing to pay for the services I use, why do you expect me to pay for the ones you use?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-10-2016, 02:11 PM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,121,492 times
Reputation: 2037
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
LOL... there is only one fund being robbed here. I'm all for separate funds, paid for by those using that service. I'm willing to pay for the services I use, why do you expect me to pay for the ones you use?
You don't use every road in the country either, so what's the difference? You will pay for both roads and transit, no big deal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2016, 05:16 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,068,169 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv1033 View Post
You don't use every road in the country either, so what's the difference?
It would not be difficult for me to pay for what roads I use. As I suggested previously make the fees such as registration enough to cover administrative costs and implement a per mile tax based on the weight of the vehicle. That's about as fair as it gets, my vehicle does X amount damage to the road and when adjusted for the weight I'm paying for the damage I do. Currently the fuel tax partly accomplishes this, typically larger vehicles consume more fuel and pay more.

This would include trucking which would see a significant increase in the tax they pay. The trucking industry is subsidized and that burden falls primarily onto the motorist. Increasing the tax on the trucking industry to an equitable amount would increase the cost of goods at the store placing the burden on everyone instead of just motorists. Long term I'll pay less for roads because the trucking industry will paying more and/or the raods will see less damage as more freight mores to rail. This may even help rail transit as more rail will be needed to meet the demands of increased long haul freight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2016, 06:59 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,742,017 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
USA.

Branson, MO.

And BTW, lots of airports are built by private companies.
Branson Airport -- that's one. Very impressive roster.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2016, 09:35 AM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,121,492 times
Reputation: 2037
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
It would not be difficult for me to pay for what roads I use. As I suggested previously make the fees such as registration enough to cover administrative costs and implement a per mile tax based on the weight of the vehicle. That's about as fair as it gets, my vehicle does X amount damage to the road and when adjusted for the weight I'm paying for the damage I do. Currently the fuel tax partly accomplishes this, typically larger vehicles consume more fuel and pay more.

This would include trucking which would see a significant increase in the tax they pay. The trucking industry is subsidized and that burden falls primarily onto the motorist. Increasing the tax on the trucking industry to an equitable amount would increase the cost of goods at the store placing the burden on everyone instead of just motorists. Long term I'll pay less for roads because the trucking industry will paying more and/or the raods will see less damage as more freight mores to rail. This may even help rail transit as more rail will be needed to meet the demands of increased long haul freight.
No thanks. You will need to pay for both as that's how infrastructure works best.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2016, 10:04 PM
 
5,756 posts, read 3,999,962 times
Reputation: 2308
People on here seem to be confused about how railroads operate and the reason they are no longer in the passenger rail business its called economics.Norfolk Southern operates in 22 states the District of Columbia and Canada with 30,000 employees which see over 22,000 miles of track 20,000 buildings and infrastructure to maintain on their own.I believe their capital improvement budget was a record 2.4 billion dollars for maintaining their own line so you all can get the lastest goodies from communist China....suckers!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top