Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But we know that is almost always the case. This one is a special case of failure.
--------------
California’s $64 Billion Bullet Train To Nowhere Gets Delayed … Again
This project is more about people getting paid than about getting people from place to place.
And then there is this;
-----------
Out of the entire universe of those who could have won the first phase construction contract for California’s high speed rail boondoggle, who would stand out as the last person who would win it if there were no political patronage.
Put another way, who is the most likely person to win it if there is political patronage?
Both questions have the same answer: Richard Blum, the husband of California senator Diane Feinstein.
So, who won the contract? Blum, of course, as the principle owner of Tutor Perini, the lead firm in the three-firm consortium selected by the California High Speed Rail Authority.
That would help explain headlines like this one from just over a year ago:
"Dianne Feinstein praises Jerry Brown's high-speed rail plan"
There will not be any bullet train because we love our cars so much. Then, there are unions, regulations, environmental studies, debates, and more and more obstacles.
There will not be any bullet train because we love our cars so much. Then, there are unions, regulations, environmental studies, debates, and more and more obstacles.
But I suspect that Feinstein's husband will get his share of the money regardless of the outcome.
But we know that is almost always the case. This one is a special case of failure.
--------------
California’s $64 Billion Bullet Train To Nowhere Gets Delayed … Again
This project is more about people getting paid than about getting people from place to place.
There will not be any bullet train because we love our cars so much. Then, there are unions, regulations, environmental studies, debates, and more and more obstacles.
This. The current central planning theme of the last 70 years has been putting forth legislation and subsidies for cars and suburbs.
To nowhere? There are like +30 million people in the Bay Area, LA, and San Diego. Pretty sure those 3 metros have more people than any other state.
I'm sure you skipped this part.
Even when completed, the first leg will only run from Madera (population 63,105) down to Shafter, a small town north of Bakersfield. Not exactly a heavy transportation corridor.
Even when completed, the first leg will only run from Madera (population 63,105) down to Shafter, a small town north of Bakersfield. Not exactly a heavy transportation corridor.
Well they are trying to build a whole line, not one leg. You're article with its misleading title is silly.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 26 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,573 posts, read 16,556,695 times
Reputation: 6044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003
I'm sure you skipped this part.
Even when completed, the first leg will only run from Madera (population 63,105) down to Shafter, a small town north of Bakersfield. Not exactly a heavy transportation corridor.
Madera is like 6 miles north of downtown Fresno( 520,000) and Shafter borders Bakersfield(363,000)
In most states, those would be the 2 largest cities, so lets stop talking as if they built the first leg in the middle of nowhere.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.