Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-18-2016, 11:35 AM
 
45,226 posts, read 26,443,162 times
Reputation: 24980

Advertisements

Yes, thank you for illustrating how similiar the left and right are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-18-2016, 11:36 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,565,372 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
I am so sick and tired of entitled seniors. Universal health care for 65 and older? How about universal health coverage for everyone or no one. Seniors vote all these benefits for themselves but I pay for it. Seniors were against health coverage for citizens younger than they are but want those same citizens without health coverage to pay for seniors.

Further, one in five seniors is also on Medicaid. That's right, one in five seniors collects Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. And let's not forget the unfunded Medicare Part D because seniors just can't suck up enough money for themselves while complaining about everyone else.

- Few seniors have actually paid for their Medicare benefits. According to an Urban Institute estimate, the typical retired couple paid $122,000 in lifetime Medicare taxes but can expect to receive benefits worth $387,000. Social Security is another story. There, the average retired couple paid $600,000 in lifetime taxes for $579,000 in benefits. Put together, it's $722,000 in taxes for $966,000 in benefits. (All figures are adjusted for inflation.)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...cial-security/

I would have no problem with states running their own health care as long as my state could implement a five or ten year qualification period so people from other states couldn't run to my state when they get sick. I would want an extremely long qualification period. They can hold their own state accountable, not run to my state.
That's can't be right. I was told by the liberals that the government can do no wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2016, 11:47 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,538,911 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Yes, thank you for illustrating how similiar the left and right are.
And while we're at it, let's end other forms of corporate welfare, like illegal immigration, low minimum wages supplemented by taxpayer funded food stamps, Medicaid, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2016, 11:49 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,565,372 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
Another lefty publication weighs in:

Ending the Corporate-Welfare Circus - WSJ

That old standard of the left, The Wall St Journal.
Fail to see how these are corporate welfare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2016, 12:00 PM
 
9,911 posts, read 7,699,445 times
Reputation: 2494
Illegals/legal immigrants and those on VISAS shouldn't be allowed to be on welfare programs in the US
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2016, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Eastern Tennessee
4,383 posts, read 4,389,618 times
Reputation: 12679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delahanty View Post
1. There's nothing wrong with health care in this country.

2. They'd better keep their hands off Medicare.

3. CHIPS is a Medicaid program.

4. You can't limit Medicaid to only those on disability. Those receiving welfare are generally enrolled in Medicaid, and should be. What needs to happen is that qualifying for assistance should be more stringent. And those on disability qualify for Medicare after 2 years, anyway.

5. "Disability" should be narrowly defined. Plenty of people work every day with "back pain," along with the infirmities that came towards the end of their 25, 30, or 35 years of work.

6. I have no idea what you said about the EITC. But the entire program is an annual handout of thousands of dollars (that's each), and it encourages fraud. It should be chucked.
That makes a grand total of one person who thinks so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2016, 12:12 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,538,911 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Fail to see how these are corporate welfare.

Maybe you could straighten out the Wall St Journal on that point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2016, 12:14 PM
 
Location: Wartrace,TN
8,065 posts, read 12,779,194 times
Reputation: 16490
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinytrump View Post
you do know many welfare and food stamp recipients are our militray vets dont you?
Do you have any statistics on that? If you bring it up then you ought to know the answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2016, 12:19 PM
 
8,275 posts, read 7,947,458 times
Reputation: 12122
People on food assistance should get only basics sent to their house. Basically the stuff needed to keep the alive. No brand names and no luxury items like snacks or dessert.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2016, 12:26 PM
 
9,911 posts, read 7,699,445 times
Reputation: 2494
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a nonprofit D.C.-based think tank, estimates that as many as 340,000 veterans rely on federal or state rental assistance. About 900,000 veterans live on food stamps, and an additional 5,000 active-duty service members are food stamp recipients.Dec 9, 2013

There should be universal healthcare for any soldier serving 8 year's of active duty and be eligible at any time to dip into a federal welfare program just for Vets. However, it should be income capped at say $50,000.

Welfare benefits in general auld be capped at $50,000 or if people are dipping into them making above $50,000 should be taxed accordingly.

Our soldiers shouldn't need to receive federal assistance while serving. Wages should be increased.

Minimum wage should be a living wage with no minimum. It should reflect on average COL in the State. The wage can deflate or inflate yearly based on fluctuation of COL.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top