Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-03-2016, 07:23 AM
 
27,658 posts, read 16,151,349 times
Reputation: 19081

Advertisements

Idiot in chief is nearly as big a liar as Hilliary

 
Old 08-03-2016, 07:25 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,241,574 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
This. The timing is VERY "convenient", but to call it a ransom payment is intellectually dishonest. It's part of a settlement decided in international court at The Hague. It's money we owe them, according to international law.
You don't have to ship held money the way this was done. That would be transferred with computer clicks.

This isn't even a decent attempt at a spin.
 
Old 08-03-2016, 07:26 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,241,574 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGem View Post
Are we sure it was for the military guys and not the reporters/hikers/tourists?
Where the government is concerned we can't be sure of anything.
 
Old 08-03-2016, 07:28 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,395,288 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
You don't have to ship held money the way this was done. That would be transferred with computer clicks.

This isn't even a decent attempt at a spin.


What on Earth does the delivery method have to do with ANYTHING? Is this money we owed them, according to an international court settlement? Yes. End of story.


Did you miss this little tidbit from the article?


The $400 million was paid in foreign currency because any transaction with Iran in U.S. dollars is illegal under U.S. law. Sanctions also complicate Tehran’s access to global banks.



Did the Iranians use the sailors as leverage to get the payment? It certainly looks that way. Does that make it "ransom"? Absolutely not.






Ransom is the practice of holding a prisoner or item to extort money or property to secure their release, or it may refer to the sum of money involved. In an early German law, a similar concept was called weregild.


If we legally owed them the money, it cannot possibly be extorted. See how that works?
 
Old 08-03-2016, 07:34 AM
 
4,040 posts, read 2,558,574 times
Reputation: 4010
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS Jaun View Post
I would have laughed at that statement 2 years ago.
Unfortunately there are far too many out there who are STILL laughing about this stuff.
 
Old 08-03-2016, 07:35 AM
 
21,481 posts, read 10,588,412 times
Reputation: 14130
The Obama Admin. didn't deny they sent $400M in pallets of foreign currency cash to Iran at all. They claim it was a refund of the money Iran deposited for warplanes in 1979, that was held after they took American hostages and held them for 444 days. It was all just a coincidence that the refund happened at the same time as the prisoner swap.

That's right, either way you look at it, this deal stinks. We either paid for the release of prisoners, or we refunded money to people who took 55 hostages and held them for nearly two years. I don't know how anyone can defend this deal.

The entire Iran nuclear deal stinks to high heaven. We got nada, and they got everything they wanted.

Last edited by Ibginnie; 08-03-2016 at 08:48 AM.. Reason: deleted quoted post
 
Old 08-03-2016, 07:41 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,317 posts, read 26,245,816 times
Reputation: 15654
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
We were in their waters. They had every right to do exactly as we would have done if an Iranian boat had been in ours.
These were the 4 American hostages they released, the Washington Post reporter, marine, not the naval crew on the 2 boats.


Rather strange that they wouldn't make an electronic transfer but this was true back when Carter was negotiating the release of the hostages, transfers were through 3rd party countries and it failed because of complications

Last edited by Goodnight; 08-03-2016 at 07:50 AM..
 
Old 08-03-2016, 07:59 AM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,702,384 times
Reputation: 5132
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve40th View Post
WASHINGTON—The Obama administration secretly organized an airlift of $400 million worth of cash to Iran that coincided with the January release of four Americans detained in Tehran, according to U.S. and European officials and congressional staff briefed on the operation afterward.

Wooden pallets stacked with euros, Swiss francs and other currencies were flown into Iran on an unmarked cargo plane, according to these officials. The U.S. procured the money from the central banks of the Netherlands and Switzerland, they said.
"Secretly"...
"U.S. and European officials and congressional staff briefed on the operation afterward"...
"Wooden pallets stacked with euros, Swiss francs and other currencies"...
"unmarked cargo plane ...

Is this how the US pays the money we owe them, the balance of a 'deal' worked out in an international court at The Hague?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
This. The timing is VERY "convenient", but to call it a ransom payment is intellectually dishonest. It's part of a settlement decided in international court at The Hague. It's money we owe them, according to international law.
Why be so secretive about legitimate money owed someone?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
You don't have to ship held money the way this was done. That would be transferred with computer clicks.

This isn't even a decent attempt at a spin.


Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
What on Earth does the delivery method have to do with ANYTHING? Is this money we owed them, according to an international court settlement? Yes. End of story.

Did you miss this little tidbit from the article?

The $400 million was paid in foreign currency because any transaction with Iran in U.S. dollars is illegal under U.S. law. Sanctions also complicate Tehran’s access to global banks.

Did the Iranians use the sailors as leverage to get the payment? It certainly looks that way. Does that make it "ransom"? Absolutely not.

Ransom is the practice of holding a prisoner or item to extort money or property to secure their release, or it may refer to the sum of money involved. In an early German law, a similar concept was called weregild.

If we legally owed them the money, it cannot possibly be extorted. See how that works?
Does that constitute money laundering??

If it was legally owed, it did not need to be secretly shipped.
 
Old 08-03-2016, 08:05 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,663,022 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
What part isn't true?

The Obama Administration has admitted the payment went through at that time, but insists it had nothing to do with hostages and everything to do with the right time to resolve that issue (frozen Iran assets) with other issues.

Knee jerk reaction to always defend Obama?

At least read the article before you start screaming Obama is infallible and FoxNews is akin to ISIS.

Why would Iran say Obama paid a ransom? Cash deal not paid in US dollars??? Red Flag!
Those frozen assets must still be frozen and still illegal to send US dollars to Iran. The case has not yet been litigated.
 
Old 08-03-2016, 08:09 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,999,439 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve40th View Post
WASHINGTON—The Obama administration secretly organized an airlift of $400 million worth of cash to Iran that coincided with the January release of four Americans detained in Tehran, according to U.S. and European officials and congressional staff briefed on the operation afterward.

Wooden pallets stacked with euros, Swiss francs and other currencies were flown into Iran on an unmarked cargo plane, according to these officials. The U.S. procured the money from the central banks of the Netherlands and Switzerland, they said.
1. It wasn't secret.

2. It was some of the money we seized from Iran in 1979.

3. The money belongs to Iran.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top