Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-25-2016, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,079 posts, read 51,252,674 times
Reputation: 28327

Advertisements

Here's a suggestion to get younger people in. Have a certain fraction of insurance premiums offset student debt. For example, if the insurance premium is $100 and the student loan payment is $100, $50 of the insurance premium could be credited to the monthly student loan payment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-25-2016, 02:38 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,830,486 times
Reputation: 10789
I wonder how the ACA would be doing now if there was a public option to compete with those high prices. The insurance companies, who fought against the public option because of the competition, are now gouging members. The best and fastest way to put an end to this is to open up the public option to compete with rip-off insurance companies.

Quote:
the most obvious solution for this dilemma is to bring back the ‘public option’. Back in 2009, the Democrats needed Joe Lieberman’s vote to get reform passed, and insurers knew it. Shortly before the Senate was set to vote on the bill, Lieberman said he would vote for the bill only if the public option was stripped out. They justifiably called him an ‘Insurance Puppet’, but the insurance industry got its way.
Quote:
In other words, the insurance companies have us by the balls. If they pull out of the exchanges, there is no alternative. Putting in the Public Option would fill that gap.
Why we Need the Public Option more than Ever

Last edited by jojajn; 10-25-2016 at 02:50 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2016, 02:43 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,875 posts, read 26,526,580 times
Reputation: 25777
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
What is this "major medical" ( traditional ) provider you speak of? How do these plans differ from ACA plans?
"Major Medical" was the term for "catastrophic care" insurance in the "old days" (aka pre-o-care). You could get insurance that would prevent bankruptcy for major issues (cancer treatment, major trauma, etc) for $150 a month or so. It didn't cover routine maintenance, d*ck meds, birth control or every hypochondriacs Dr. visit for a runny nose. Instead, it covered the things that, you know, you need INSURANCE for. It's like car insurance. You get a payout if your car is totaled. Not to pay for oil changes.

We need to bring that back (basically get ride of O-care) and open up health savings accounts to everyone. I was fortunate enough to have one through a high-deduction plan at one point-still paying my HC needs with it 5 years later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2016, 02:47 PM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,079 posts, read 51,252,674 times
Reputation: 28327
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
I wonder how the ACA would be doing now if there was a public option to compete with those high prices. The insurance companies, who fought against the public option because of the competition, is now gouging members. The best and fastest way to put an end to this is to open up the public option to compete with rip-off insurance companies.




Why we Need the Public Option more than Ever
I'm not convinced it's gouging. Under the ACA insurers profits are limited to 20%. While there is likely some fudging going on, it seems just as likely that they are losing their shirts because not enough young/healthy people are signing up relative to the sickly. The incentives/penalties are simply not high enough to induce the more profitable sectors to participate. To fix it, you need to increase subisidies, fines or both as well as force competition with a public option.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2016, 02:47 PM
 
8,104 posts, read 3,963,035 times
Reputation: 3070
Both of you are right

As they say, follow the money:

Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
Republicans dont represent you, they represent the donor class. Are you a member of the big money donor class? The billionaire class laugh at people who vote for their puppets. If you want representation, vote for people who are not beholden to anyone but the people. Dont vote for puppets who laugh in your face. You might as well give your money straight to the billionaires instead of voting for their puppets. Dont complain when your representative serve the interests of his and hers financial overlords.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Democrats dont represent you, they represent the donor class. Are you a member of the big money donor class? The billionaire class (Like George Soros and Mark Zuckerberg) laugh at people who vote for their puppets. If you want representation, vote for people who are not beholden to anyone but the people. Dont vote for puppets who laugh in your face. You might as well give your money straight to the billionaires instead of voting for their puppets. Dont complain when your representative serve the interests of his and hers financial overlords.

Lobbying Spending Database | OpenSecrets

Top Lobbying Industries


Pharmaceuticals/Health Products $3,395,880,031
Insurance $2,348,468,087

Electric Utilities $2,129,376,100
Business Associations $1,946,673,849
Electronics Mfg & Equip $1,940,503,766
Oil & Gas $1,847,575,425
Misc Manufacturing & Distributing $1,511,994,820
Education $1,476,888,715
Hospitals/Nursing Homes $1,402,882,774
Securities & Investment $1,364,724,723
Telecom Services $1,359,889,792
Real Estate $1,297,024,077
Civil Servants/Public Officials $1,291,039,268
Health Professionals $1,273,221,571
Air Transport $1,208,381,154
Misc Issues $978,631,308
Defense Aerospace $959,070,142
Automotive $953,066,874
Health Services/HMOs $944,142,669
TV/Movies/Music $914,287,763


Take a look at the politicians of all stripes that went heavy in Big Pharma and Big Insurance stocks after Obamacare passed. Also look at the politicians that were paid off by by these same entities. There is no partisan divide when it comes to profiting of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2016, 02:51 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,830,486 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
I'm not convinced it's gouging. Under the ACA insurers profits are limited to 20%. While there is likely some fudging going on, it seems just as likely that they are losing their shirts because not enough young/healthy people are signing up relative to the sickly. The incentives/penalties are simply not high enough to induce the more profitable sectors to participate. To fix it, you need to increase subisidies, fines or both as well as force competition with a public option.
Then those same insurance companies should have no problem with a public option, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2016, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,830,486 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
"Major Medical" was the term for "catastrophic care" insurance in the "old days" (aka pre-o-care). You could get insurance that would prevent bankruptcy for major issues (cancer treatment, major trauma, etc) for $150 a month or so. It didn't cover routine maintenance, d*ck meds, birth control or every hypochondriacs Dr. visit for a runny nose. Instead, it covered the things that, you know, you need INSURANCE for. It's like car insurance. You get a payout if your car is totaled. Not to pay for oil changes.

We need to bring that back (basically get ride of O-care) and open up health savings accounts to everyone. I was fortunate enough to have one through a high-deduction plan at one point-still paying my HC needs with it 5 years later.
What dollar amount would you consider "catastrophic?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2016, 02:58 PM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,079 posts, read 51,252,674 times
Reputation: 28327
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Then those same insurance companies should have no problem with a public option, right?
Only if the healthy people do not go on it. If all applicants with a significant medical history were forced onto the public option, the insurers would embrace it. Insurers are in this to make money. If you put up enough obstacles to that, they get out of the business and that probably ought to be the long term goal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2016, 03:12 PM
 
47 posts, read 20,088 times
Reputation: 17
I don't know the solution, but we have a pretty unhealthy population. Obesity needs to be punished financially. I believe people should be able to decide what to put in their bodies but obesity has gotten out of control.

Maybe make Medicare premiums tied to how healthy one is, that'll get the boomers moving. Same with Medicaid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2016, 03:20 PM
 
1,448 posts, read 1,188,373 times
Reputation: 1268
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv10334eva View Post
Maybe make Medicare premiums tied to how healthy one is
Why stop there? We should just haul our elderly out to the woods and leave them to die, right? They use up an inordinate amount of our health care capacity. Smokers, fatties, the elderly, sickly babies and housewives with Coca Cola habits should be sacrificed for the good of the healthy people in our society.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top