Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But it's not a "Muslim" ban. It's a temporary ban on "all people" from specific countries. Thus, not unconstitutional. In fact, Obama did the exact same thing.
You're wrong... it is unconstitutional to punish an undocumented person for committing a crime. And it's racist. Love Trump's hate okay. We owe it to these people because Americans have stolen from everyone.
The next bombers could easily be from any of those terrorists countries.
But more likely from Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, or Afghanistan, which aren't on the list. People from these countries with visas can still freely enter the US.
Women are essentially slaves and have practically no rights. Their backwards culturally and unless they want to leave that ideal behind and accept our way of life, I don't want them here. If a woman goes to UAE she has to wear goofy crap on her head or face prosecution. They expect us to conform to their culture, we should expect them to conform to ours.
What many Liberals don't understand is that this is TEMPORARY. It is not barring people permanently, nor is it a religious litmus test. It is an attempt to give priority to persecuted Christians, Jews, and even some Muslims (like Kurds) in the Middle East.
As usual, the media lied about what this is all about.
Learn the basics of American government methodology via a Civics class please.
There is no such thing as a "national Presidential order." There are however, Presidential Executive Orders.
Note at the explanatory section about Presidential Executive Orders in the link below it is noted that such orders are considered binding but they are "subject to legal review".
I'm sure that you were glad on the occasions when judges blocked some of President Obama's Executive Orders so now turnabout w/ trump's orders is similarly legal under the constitution. Get used to it & deal with it. It's part of our constitutionally mandated system of checks and balances as found in basic civics classes.
When the president makes an EO, it's national. The check is by the Supreme Court not some rinky dink court. Even so, the president is in charge of the nation's security not the courts. So the president should be the end stop on security issues.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
