Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It is unlawful to harass a person (an applicant or employee) because of that person’s sex. Harassment can include “sexual harassment” or unwelcome sexual advances...
It's nothing wrong if the sexual advance is welcome.
So tell me then, how does your cult leader know his grabbing is welcome if he doesn't ask? As I said, use your own brain....
You might want to be careful, glasses houses and all- your side just elected the guy who used to be on the Apprentice to have stewardship of the largest nuclear arsenal in the world....I believe the guy form Joe Millionaire was unavailable due to prior commitments...I'd rather have Oscar, at least I know he values education, and would treat Putin the same as he did everyone else....
The same argument was made against Reagan and was even a joke in Back to the Future. What, a guy who played pretend Cowboys and Indians in the movies now has the ability to start WW3? Turned out quite fine with him.
Because there's no "popular vote" in a electoral college vote for Trump to lose.
If there were, both candidates would have campaigned differently to win the popular vote.
It absolutely bizarre that you people keep talking about this phantom.
Of course it doesn't elect the President. But he still lost the plurality of the total votes. Are you claiming you cannot add up the total votes in the country?
Such a bizarre debate.
I'm not sure why Trump and some people can't move on from these points. You won - be happy?
Of course it doesn't elect the President. But he still lost the plurality of the total votes. Are you claiming you cannot add up the total votes in the country?
Such a bizarre debate.
Have you considered that if the "popular vote" matters, people would vote differently and the candidates would campaign differently?
I know what the current number shows but it does not show "popular vote." It's very bizarre for you to think the total vote is somehow the "popular vote."
By the way, I was NOT the one bringing up this "popular vote" nonsense. I did called out the lie about the existence of the "popular vote."
Have you considered that if the "popular vote" matters, people would vote differently and the candidates would campaign differently?
I know what the current number shows but it does not show "popular vote." It's very bizarre for you to think the total vote is somehow the "popular vote."
Is not my term...maybe you should let everyone in the country know because the phrase is used frequently to describe total votes?
The same argument was made against Reagan and was even a joke in Back to the Future. What, a guy who played pretend Cowboys and Indians in the movies now has the ability to start WW3? Turned out quite fine with him.
except he was actually Gov of that horrible evil hellhole of a state of CA beforehand...
Is not my term...maybe you should let everyone in the country know because the phrase is used frequently to describe total votes?
I'd love to but the liberal media won't shut up about the phantom popular vote.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
