Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm saddened that it has come to this. I am not a trump supporter but I need him to stop watching so much crap, and stop listening to so much crap and get focused on the tasks at hand. He was DEAD wrong, he should just admit and move on. Instead I have to watch spicer twist himself into knots over an obvious lie. In the meantime we have hundreds of government posts that need to be filled and trump is still having rallies as if if he still campaigning.
There is no wire tapping and so far no proof of Trump team colluding with Russians to fix elections. Wire tapping allegations going to affect Trump. This Russian thing is going to affect Democrats who spent lot of time driving this message to their supporters.
Ask the NY Times. They reported that the Trump campaign was wiretapped and transcripts were reported to the WH.
Really? Did they? How about you find that story and quote it?
Too hard to find real facts? Is the NY Times to complicated to actually read? Ok--here:
The New York Timesreport does use the word "wiretap;" the print headline was "Wiretapped Data Used in Inquiry of Trump Aides."It doesn’t appear that Trump read the article closely, however, because it does not say Obama personally ordered a tap on his phones during the election, as Trump claimed in his tweet....The New York Times article is about intercepted communications used by the FBI amid its investigation into some of Trump’s current and former aides — including Roger Stone, Carter Page and Paul Manafort — and their ties to Russia. It does not say whether the surveillance targeted Russians or Americans.
The difference between the substance of the New York Times article and what Trump claimed in his tweet is significant, because Trump’s tweet alleges Obama possibly acted outside the law to harm a political opponent, whereas the New York Times described aspects of an FBI investigation.
Trump took an article about legitimate intelligence investigations and completely distorted it. We rate his claim False..."
Trump is the Sick Guy! And contrary to popular opinion--he surrounds himself with scumbags.
Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion
Quote:
Originally Posted by ritholtz
There is no wire tapping and so far no proof of Trump team colluding with Russians to fix elections. Wire tapping allegations going to affect Trump. This Russian thing is going to affect Democrats who spent lot of time driving this message to their supporters.
FROM MSNBC POLITICS shows to town hall meetings across the country, the overarching issue for the Democratic Party’s base since Trump’s victory has been Russia, often suffocating attention for other issues. This fixation has persisted even though it has no chance to sink the Trump presidency unless it is proven that high levels of the Trump campaign actively colluded with the Kremlin to manipulate the outcome of the U.S. election — a claim for which absolutely no evidence has thus far been presented.
The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies — just as right-wing media polemicists did after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected — that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence. And they are all waiting for the day, which they regard as inevitable and imminent, when this theory will be proven and Trump will be removed." (my highlights)
Lol...so there's goes the Democrat's favorite Russian fairy tale flushed down the toilet.
Like it or not libs, Trump's tweets did the trick. It forced everyone's hand. The MSM will never admit their complicity in this nonsense but Trump flushed everyone out.
Impeachment? Who's going to get the ball rolling...Maxine Waters?
Really? Did they? How about you find that story and quote it?
Too hard to find real facts? Is the NY Times to complicated to actually read? Ok--here:
The New York Timesreport does use the word "wiretap;" the print headline was "Wiretapped Data Used in Inquiry of Trump Aides."It doesn’t appear that Trump read the article closely, however, because it does not say Obama personally ordered a tap on his phones during the election, as Trump claimed in his tweet....The New York Times article is about intercepted communications used by the FBI amid its investigation into some of Trump’s current and former aides — including Roger Stone, Carter Page and Paul Manafort — and their ties to Russia. It does not say whether the surveillance targeted Russians or Americans.
The difference between the substance of the New York Times article and what Trump claimed in his tweet is significant, because Trump’s tweet alleges Obama possibly acted outside the law to harm a political opponent, whereas the New York Times described aspects of an FBI investigation.
Trump took an article about legitimate intelligence investigations and completely distorted it. We rate his claim False..."
Trump is the Sick Guy! And contrary to popular opinion--he surrounds himself with scumbags.
FROM MSNBC POLITICS shows to town hall meetings across the country, the overarching issue for the Democratic Party’s base since Trump’s victory has been Russia, often suffocating attention for other issues. This fixation has persisted even though it has no chance to sink the Trump presidency unless it is proven that high levels of the Trump campaign actively colluded with the Kremlin to manipulate the outcome of the U.S. election — a claim for which absolutely no evidence has thus far been presented.
The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies — just as right-wing media polemicists did after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected — that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence. And they are all waiting for the day, which they regard as inevitable and imminent, when this theory will be proven and Trump will be removed." (my highlights)
Lol...so there's goes the Democrat's favorite Russian fairy tale flushed down the toilet.
Like it or not libs, Trump's tweets did the trick. It forced everyone's hand. The MSM will never admit their complicity in this nonsense but Trump flushed everyone out.
Impeachment? Who's going to get the ball rolling...Maxine Waters?
Maxine Waters? Huh? Yeah sure. Nobody cares about Maxine Waters.
We have a so-called president who lies, accuses the last president of fictional felonies (probably because he is jealous because Obama had higher poll numbers and inaugural attendance), based on things he saw on Faux News tv and heard on the radio from loonies, acts like a five-year-old and has no idea what McCarthyism means.
Nobody cares about impeaching Maxine Waters.
As for Trump--everyone is watching his missteps and craziness. American Oversight is keeping a legal eye on him. Worry about his impeachment. You think Dems care about his Russian ties? Actually more GOPers care about his Russian ties.
Dems care that he is destroying the country and acting like an ignorant childish idiot while doing so.
Coupled with an inability to control himself, an anger management issue, a narcissistic personality, a tendency towards pathological lying, an insatiable ego, a huge inferiority complex, absent minders, too much time on his hands due to an inability to focus on anything for longer than 4 seconds, and possibly early Alzheimer's.... but, yes.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.