Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why the push back when Obama is said to wiretap Trump?? Bias!!!
No evidence Trump was in collusion with Russia.. no push back!! Bias!!!
Dems and Rinos and MSM doing their thing!!! THEY ARE BIAS!!!
The investigation is regarding Russians hacking into our election process not specifically Trump.
The only person that has stated that Obama wiretapped Trump was Trump himself, maybe he could get Sessions, Pompeo or McMaster to clear this up.
The investigation is regarding Russians hacking into our election process not specifically Trump.
The only person that has stated that Obama wiretapped Trump was Trump himself, maybe he could get Sessions, Pompeo or McMaster to clear this up.
Actually others have said it by now including people who were in the Obama administration. What remains is the legality and what they did with the information.
This can be word-weaseled until the cows come home. But if the 'intelligence community' leaks about various Trump people having conversations/meeting with Russians during the campaign and the transition are true, and that information was leaked; then one has to be honest and ask if the act of 'leaking' that 'intelligence' information is itself illegal and orchestrated by holdover Obama administration forces?
Further, the very first question to ask is, What exactly has anyone on the Trump team done that is illegal? And no, an investigation there is not the needed answer. It is the intelligence community and anonymous sources that need investigating.
Ultimately, this is all 1950s Red Scare type orchestrated hysteria. A real shame the liberal progressives have nothing other than this comical Laurel and Hardy parody of McCarthyism. The Russians are coming! The Russians are coming!
The investigation is regarding Russians hacking into our election process not specifically Trump.
Not specifically Trump, so you mean Obama promising Putin more flexibility after the election if the don't make any waves prior to, as Romney was mean to Russia...?
Very difficult question. Obama has little history of meddling with tapping. If there is at least some proof about FISA court order, I think it is pretty sure he did it. There are some rumors about DOJ trying with FISA order. All of them are rumors.
More accurately, President Trump is with the establishment and ran an anti-establishment campaign to get elected. He owns Trump Tower, golf resorts, etc. Then observe his cabinet choices. Lol.
Show us the evidence please. Anyone can make an accusation or allegation about anyone else.
At this point, proof may be a missing hard drive(s) / documents of the sort we saw disappear during the Tea Party / IRS investigation, but that's OK because information already leaked by Obama holdovers shows spying did occur.
Besides, the Obama administration (include Clinton) made concealing / destroying evidence a matter of habit, so I consider them guilty until proven innocent.
If Obama did indeed illegally wiretap Trump I am sure compelling evidence will be forthcoming within the next day or two.
If not, perhaps this assertion will be forgotten by the end of this month?
^ this
You can't just get an FISA warrant to bug someone's communications. Criteria need to be met before a judge will sign off on this, and if a judge did sign off on this it means that there is significant evidence that Trump could be involved in criminal activity.
Edit: IMO what I think really happened is that the Feds were monitoring the calls of a 3rd party (ie: perhaps Russian agents or people suspected of being such) and during this process they came across Trump being in communication with whoever they were snooping on.
You can't just get an FISA warrant to bug someone's communications. Criteria need to be met before a judge will sign off on this, and if a judge did sign off on this it means that there is significant evidence that Trump could be involved in criminal activity.
Thank you.
Exactly.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.