Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-04-2017, 06:49 PM
 
12,270 posts, read 11,335,521 times
Reputation: 8066

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by vacoder View Post
Who leaked rices name?
Disgruntled staffers at Bloomberg or the NYT. Both had her name and wouldn't run the story.

Cernovich Explains How He Learned About Susan Rice | Zero Hedge
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-04-2017, 06:53 PM
 
Location: Florida
33,571 posts, read 18,174,016 times
Reputation: 15551
Quote:
Originally Posted by vacoder View Post
Who leaked rices name?
Probably the NSA.,and it wasn't leaked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2017, 07:00 PM
 
Location: Salisbury,NC
16,759 posts, read 8,220,852 times
Reputation: 8537
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Do you think it is possible that laws were broken on both sides?
No.

The Patriot act allows for the collection and allows for the unmasking. The only unmasking which got out was Flynn from the current WH staff.

It is Ironic that the GOP Patriot acts first big get was a GOP POTUS and his staff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2017, 07:22 PM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,820,009 times
Reputation: 3544
Quote:
Originally Posted by NxtGen View Post
What evidence does the FBI have?

Lets also consider that this is the same FBI who in the face of an OBVIOUS and UNDENIABLE offense of law that Hillary made concerning the espionage act, DIRECTLY , and IN THE FACE OF DIRECT QUESTION AND SCRUTINY to the obvious result by Congressional hearing, REFUSED to charge Hillary Clinton for her violation of the espionage act.

So... what fact do you have there? Or are you simply pulling things out of your arse based on an investigation from a department that has shown OBVIOUS bias and collusion and even to this very day CAN'T even inform their congressional oversights as to the "EVIDENCE" they claim they have?

LOL

You like that koolaid? Is it good?
Really now. You think that the FBI is going to publish their on-going investigation evidence in a possible world-wide Russian money laundering case along with probable interference in political elections?

Are you serious? You sound very, very naive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 06:58 AM
 
4,279 posts, read 1,905,917 times
Reputation: 1266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weichert View Post
Really now. You think that the FBI is going to publish their on-going investigation evidence in a possible world-wide Russian money laundering case along with probable interference in political elections?

Are you serious? You sound very, very naive.
Got nothing, I see.

Next?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 07:43 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,541,024 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by NxtGen View Post
What evidence does the FBI have?

Lets also consider that this is the same FBI who in the face of an OBVIOUS and UNDENIABLE offense of law that Hillary made concerning the espionage act, DIRECTLY , and IN THE FACE OF DIRECT QUESTION AND SCRUTINY to the obvious result by Congressional hearing, REFUSED to charge Hillary Clinton for her violation of the espionage act.

So... what fact do you have there? Or are you simply pulling things out of your arse based on an investigation from a department that has shown OBVIOUS bias and collusion and even to this very day CAN'T even inform their congressional oversights as to the "EVIDENCE" they claim they have?

LOL

You like that koolaid? Is it good?
It does not matter if I like it or not. Understand?


It is what it is.


The FBI is investigating Russian collusion. Period, full stop.


Comey is no friend to Democrats in case you've already forgotten.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 09:15 AM
 
4,279 posts, read 1,905,917 times
Reputation: 1266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
It does not matter if I like it or not. Understand?


It is what it is.


The FBI is investigating Russian collusion. Period, full stop.


Comey is no friend to Democrats in case you've already forgotten.
There are also investigations into Obama's administration spying on a citizen for the sake of political advantage and attempting to sway an election with that knowledge.

So what do you have to say about that?

Here is the funny thing though. There is ACTUAL evidence that shows this to be an issue while your claim of Russian collusion is non-existent, there is NOTHING, just allegations.

Comey is absolutely a "friend of the democrats". He REFUSED to charge Clinton on a crime that he admitted existed and could not deny that she was guilty of.

So cut the BS, you people are as biased and partisan as the day is long.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 10:44 AM
 
59,113 posts, read 27,340,319 times
Reputation: 14289
Quote:
Originally Posted by floridanative10 View Post
Obamagate and Susan Rice is pretty much all the talk of talk radio, right wing web sites today. I have never seen a story catch fire like this in such a short time. Why did Obama hire someone like Rice with so little foreign policy experience and did such a poor job at the UN and on benghazi and Libya and so little credentials to be the national security adviser.

videos on her knowledge on the spying leaks

First she says she knew nothing about this , than in the second video she never denies the surveillance of trump but says it wasnt political and she personally didnt leak anything. lol Of course it wasnt political .lol

Why would obama let someone so little credibility with Capitol Hill, with the foreign policy community and foreign leaders, and is so badly tarnished by the Benghazi scandal to be his national security adviser is my main question, if she did this she is an idiot.

I cant wait for the hearings on this



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAD7oyAN0Ck


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpjN4iEz9Oo
Does anyone know how much coverage of this is being aired on the alphabet networks.

My guess is very little, if any.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 11:15 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,541,024 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by NxtGen View Post
There are also investigations into Obama's administration spying on a citizen for the sake of political advantage and attempting to sway an election with that knowledge.

So what do you have to say about that?

Here is the funny thing though. There is ACTUAL evidence that shows this to be an issue while your claim of Russian collusion is non-existent, there is NOTHING, just allegations.

Comey is absolutely a "friend of the democrats". He REFUSED to charge Clinton on a crime that he admitted existed and could not deny that she was guilty of.

So cut the BS, you people are as biased and partisan as the day is long.
Please do tell where I claimed there was Russian collusion. I said only that the FBI is investigating because Comey testified as to that.


Clinton committed NO crime and Comey was well aware of that. He hung her out to dry anyway. Only the most AVID Clinton haters believe she was guilty of a crime.


It's cute that you call others partisan but whatev.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 11:17 AM
 
24,421 posts, read 23,080,421 times
Reputation: 15028
Putingate was a preemptive distraction from Obamagate and the still looming Pizzagate. It's jail she'll be a goin'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top