Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-08-2017, 05:41 AM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,486,570 times
Reputation: 14398

Advertisements

What if Russia did the gassing, in a secret coordinated plan with Trump.

Step 1 for Trump to initiate the attack against Syria by blaming Assad for the gas(Trump knowing Russia did the gassing to setup Assad, but pretending that Assad did it).

Step 2 to occur later, with Russia saying they will help the US get rid of ISIS in Syria after Russia acts like they are against the US for awhile, so the Trump/Putin plan isn't exposed.

Step 3) The goal of it all and the reason for the gassing and bombing: Putin and Trump get rid of Assad and split up the oil in Syria.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-08-2017, 06:12 AM
 
24,407 posts, read 23,065,142 times
Reputation: 15016
Are Obama and Hillary Neocons as well , or just their nearly identical left wing counterparts , the neoprogs?
For the record, Assad is cut from the same cloth as Khadaffi and and Hussein. But they all got targeted for removal by the NWO global elites. The same ones the Bushes work for, the ones that own the Clintons and the ones that created Obama.
Villains all, but they aren't the worst the world has to offer. That would be globalists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2017, 06:16 AM
 
9,324 posts, read 16,665,015 times
Reputation: 15775
When US went after Iraq for chemical weapons, they were all moved into Syria, which is why we didn't find any and Bush was crucified.

Russia wants to take control of Syria that is why they are "helping" Assad. As soon as they have control, Assad will be history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2017, 06:50 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,378,527 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by floridanative10 View Post
Yes he has vehemently denied using chemical weapons, why would he use chemical weapons unless he is suicidal? He could use bombs of any type but he wants to destroy his own regime and use chemical weapons?

From a huge german news organization german site DW.com

Is Assad to blame for the chemical weapons attack in Syria? | Middle East | DW.COM | 06.04.2017

"The Syrian regime may not have had a compelling motive, believes GĂ¼nther Meyer, the director of the Research Center for the Arab World at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz.

"Only armed opposition groups could profit from an attack with chemical weapons," he told DW. "With their backs against the wall, they have next to no chance of opposing the regime militarily. "

Such actions make it possible for anti-Assad groups to receive further support."

2014, investigative journalist Seymour Hersh reported on opposition forces' ability to use chemical weapons. In an article for the "London Review of Books," Hersh obtained documents from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), the Pentagon's own spy organization. They suggested that the Nusra Front, a Syrian offshoot of al Qaeda, had access to the sarin nerve agent.

A chemical weapons attack on the Damascus suburb of Ghouta in August 2013, which was blamed on Assad, was carried out by rebels, according to Hersh's article. They wanted Washington to presume Assad had crossed Obama's "red line" and draw the US into a war."


Al Qaeda's role in Idlib

No one can say how the situation has evolved since the DIA's assessment in 2013 of the Nusra Front's weapons. The al Qaeda affiliate is today the most significant rebel group in the northern Syrian province of Idlib, Meyer said. Along with other jihadi extremists, it has turned itself into the "de facto ruler of Idlib."


Assad has not hesitated to use ruthless means to stay in power. In confronting the most recent use of chemical weapons in Syria, credible questions remain as to why Assad would bring world opinion against him at a time when his continued rule is beginning to be accepted.




From the reports I have seen, unless someone else had an SU-22 take off and land at Shayrat airbase, we are well past if and now on to why.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/w...in-attack.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2017, 07:15 AM
 
Location: Maine
3,536 posts, read 2,858,898 times
Reputation: 6839
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
From the reports I have seen, unless someone else had an SU-22 take off and land at Shayrat airbase, we are well past if and now on to why.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/w...in-attack.html
So because Syrian government planes bombed the city they had to have dropped the Gas? The Sarin could not have been released by the rebels or accidently released when the factory was hit.

The NYtimes article is comically absurd, Basically Assad wanted to make the defeated rebels, really really feel defeated, so that is why he used chemical weapons.

The ignorant American and European sheeple just got played by the globalist war machine (perpetual war/perpetual profits)
And yes that includes Pres. Trump, Although I'm still not sure if he got played or they cut him in on the profits.

I agree with the OP there is zero chance that Assad did this.


RR
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2017, 07:29 AM
 
7,413 posts, read 6,228,856 times
Reputation: 6665
The strikes removed the ability for anyone to use the chemical weapons, whether ISIS or Assad. It also sent a warning message against the use of chemical weapons.


Neocons want boots on the ground and perpetual war, and that's not what Trump is doing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2017, 07:36 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,869 posts, read 26,508,031 times
Reputation: 25772
End result-who cares if Assad used chemical weapons or not? Either way-not our country. Not our citizens. Not our problem. No reason for the missile strike either way. There is no reason to put Americans at risk for anything going on in the ME.

What happened to putting America first?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2017, 07:57 AM
 
Location: Maine
3,536 posts, read 2,858,898 times
Reputation: 6839
Quote:
Originally Posted by daylux View Post
The strikes removed the ability for anyone to use the chemical weapons, whether ISIS or Assad. It also sent a warning message against the use of chemical weapons.


Neocons want boots on the ground and perpetual war, and that's not what Trump is doing.
LOL....No.
If anything the rebels, al qaeda and ISIS have now been emboldened to gas as many civilians and children as possible, because they know it will cause the moronic western powers to blame and attack Assad's Government.
Without any evidence at all, Bomb first question later.

RR
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2017, 08:01 AM
 
9,694 posts, read 7,392,751 times
Reputation: 9931
i dont care who did it, I dont think we need to even concern ourselves about it, let them fight their own war, the more they kill, the less future terrorist we have. I dont think we need to be within a 1000 miles of the place. Let take care of america first. let russia or north korea be the world police
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2017, 08:08 AM
 
10,839 posts, read 14,726,313 times
Reputation: 7874
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
What if Russia did the gassing, in a secret coordinated plan with Trump.

Step 1 for Trump to initiate the attack against Syria by blaming Assad for the gas(Trump knowing Russia did the gassing to setup Assad, but pretending that Assad did it).

Step 2 to occur later, with Russia saying they will help the US get rid of ISIS in Syria after Russia acts like they are against the US for awhile, so the Trump/Putin plan isn't exposed.

Step 3) The goal of it all and the reason for the gassing and bombing: Putin and Trump get rid of Assad and split up the oil in Syria.
except neither russia nor the US really need Syria's oil.

Syria's oil is not the point here. It is its position on the path from Qatar's natural gaslfield to Europe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top