Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-26-2017, 04:39 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,750,585 times
Reputation: 13868

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by justNancy View Post
Obama wanted to lower corporate taxes too.
BULL!

I watched the tax debate with great interest... I understand a lot about taxes and when Obama said high income means your rich BULL it's what actually got me interest. I knew Obama and Democrats were lying through their teeth and out there asses and there was a lot of people who bought into the lie because they don't know the first thing about taxes. All he was doing is using the ignorance of the people to funnel more of the people's money to government.

Obama wanted to raise taxes again right out the gate of raising taxes the first time so I say

BULL!

Stop lying justNancy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-26-2017, 04:43 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,750,585 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by treasurefinder View Post
Ultimately this will probably help me since they are getting rid of the AMT but we itemize more than 25k in deductions so if we are capped it will probably be a wash. I don't see how the country can afford this.

The cities/states with high property taxes are going to get screwed e.g. Jersey, California, Chicago, Texas
The irony of higher taxes is that it encouraged many business owners to question or stop re-investing in their business, many who went into cruise mode or retired early. Not reinvesting in their business led to less hiring which means less people working who would have been paying taxes.

Aren't Jersey, CA and Chicago all liberal? Maybe they need to lower their taxes and allow the people who earn the money keep more of their money instead of trying to figure out ways to take more money from the people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2017, 04:49 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,750,585 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
They refer to the S-Corp tax cut as "Trump Loophole", so it's no mistake. Sure enough, Trump owns some 500 S-Corps, so this would funnel huge amounts of cash into his pockets.
Please tell me about S-Corps and how they funnel money?

By the way, I own a successful business that is classified as an S-corp but I want to hear what you know about them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2017, 04:52 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,750,585 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
It sounds good for me. I think there was only one year where my itemized deductions exceeded 24K.
Listen to the liberals scream. It's amazing is that the majority of Americans save LESS than their effective tax rate! Can you imagine being taxed at a 20% effective rate when you can only save 6% of your after tax income? How absurd is that?

There are government officials who are laughing behind closed doors at the masses for saving so little and paying so much to the government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2017, 04:53 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,384,355 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Repeal the alternative minimum tax: Abolishing the AMT would be great for the roughly 5 million tax filers who’ve seen their itemized deductions get eliminated because the government did not include an inflation adjuster when the AMT was first introduced in 1969.

Instead of making sure only wealthier earners paid taxes, the AMT unintentionally ensnared millions of ordinary taxpayers.
And the solution to it is to raise it, not repeal it. The fact that repeal is there is a good indication of whom its meant for. Trump. Remember the one year of taxes we have seen showed that the ONLY reason he paid as much as he did was the AMT.

Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Listen to the liberals scream. It's amazing is that the majority of Americans save LESS than their effective tax rate! Can you imagine being taxed at a 20% effective rate when you can only save 6% of your after tax income? How absurd is that?

There are government officials who are laughing behind closed doors at the masses for saving so little and paying so much to the government.
Because we ALSO understand that higher debt has to be paid one way or another. While in a recession its a good thing, other times its not. Who knew economics was so hard right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
The irony of higher taxes is that it encouraged many business owners to question or stop re-investing in their business, many who went into cruise mode or retired early. Not reinvesting in their business led to less hiring which means less people working who would have been paying taxes.

Aren't Jersey, CA and Chicago all liberal? Maybe they need to lower their taxes and allow the people who earn the money keep more of their money instead of trying to figure out ways to take more money from the people.
True for small businesses as they need the money to survive. NOT true for larger ones, as they simply re-invest it to get higher returns eventually while they take money out for expenses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2017, 04:56 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,750,585 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
And the solution to it is to raise it, not repeal it. The fact that repeal is there is a good indication of whom its meant for. Trump. Remember the one year of taxes we have seen showed that the ONLY reason he paid as much as he did was the AMT.
Funny, when "government" wrote the law, all those "super smart people", why didn't they include an infaltion adjustment then? They were hoping that people who are ignorant about taxes would support more people (not them) getting hit with it. AND! it almost happen too when Obama raised taxes. As if he hoped people wouldn't notice until it was too late. It was only when every day Americans who were about to get nailed with it started screaming that it was "fixes".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2017, 04:59 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,029 posts, read 14,219,965 times
Reputation: 16752
Never forget that the REAL TAXPAYER is the last guy in the chain who buys American labor and production.
Where else do corporations, stockholders, and employees get their money to pay their taxes?
The customer.
And if the customer is not paying enough for everyone to pay their taxes, expenses and so on, something breaks down - like industry, retail, and jobs.
. . .
Of course, as long as you only buy foreign made products, you duck a large portion of the tax bill.
But that won't work over the long term.

Frankly, I'd prefer a 93% drop in the federal budget (with all the trimming that implies).
No matter how painful, it is far better than the 100% drop caused by total collapse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2017, 04:59 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,750,585 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Because we ALSO understand that higher debt has to be paid one way or another. While in a recession its a good thing, other times its not. Who knew economics was so hard right?
Well when you understand support that the federal government can't pay sanctuary cities for people who shouldn't be here in the first place, then we can talk about higher debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2017, 05:02 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,750,585 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post

True for small businesses as they need the money to survive. NOT true for larger ones, as they simply re-invest it to get higher returns eventually while they take money out for expenses.
The problem is, because people don't understand money and taxation government is able to lie to them to gain their support and government always end up hurting the little guy, that's exactly what Obama did. The big guy can always find ways around it.

Do you really believe the big money would support higher taxes if they were going t get hit with it? Naive. Besides, many people are invested in these big companies for cash flow. The left would rather worry about "climate change" or whatever they call it today than policies that help the American people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2017, 05:02 PM
 
Location: on the edge of Sanity
14,268 posts, read 18,946,388 times
Reputation: 7982
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
BULL!

I watched the tax debate with great interest... I understand a lot about taxes and when Obama said high income means your rich BULL it's what actually got me interest. I knew Obama and Democrats were lying through their teeth and out there asses and there was a lot of people who bought into the lie because they don't know the first thing about taxes. All he was doing is using the ignorance of the people to funnel more of the people's money to government.

Obama wanted to raise taxes again right out the gate of raising taxes the first time so I say

BULL!

Stop lying justNancy
You know, I was just ready to post a comment I wrote in answer to your other posts, since I like the idea of increasing the standard deduction. But I guess it's impossible to have a reasonable discussion here. By the way, I know a lot about taxes too. For some reason, many people on this forum think they're political and financial geniuses and everyone else is ignorant.

Calling me a liar (as you've done before) is unacceptable. Just because you have a different opinion is no reason to be rude. So I decided not to participate in this discussion.

By the way, we were talking about Corporate Tax Rates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top