Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do wealthy people owe the 99% something? Should they?
Yes 78 35.62%
No 141 64.38%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 219. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-27-2017, 08:25 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles (Native)
25,303 posts, read 21,472,117 times
Reputation: 12319

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BornintheSprings View Post
Nice victim blaming did you miss the part where I said whites use more drugs and are arrested less? The racist justice system is huge obstacle to success for many minorities. Of course I'm sure you like it that way can't have the working class get to uppity now can we?
How did former crack dealer JayZ make it ?

He just bought a $88 million house in L.A and another one for over $20, million in the Hampton .

"Racist justice system" is just another excuse .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-27-2017, 08:27 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles (Native)
25,303 posts, read 21,472,117 times
Reputation: 12319
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
I didn't know law breakers are victims. In the real world, they are called criminals.
Our crazy leftist mayor in L.A calls them

"justice affected individuals "

LA Mayor's Office: Ex-Cons Are 'Justice-Affected Individuals' | Daily Wire
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2017, 02:15 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,360,489 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Vouchers. NOW! STOP trapping kids into horrible futures. And YES, trapping them IS a Democrat thing.
Having been watching the voucher/charter schools here it is reasonably clear what the outcome will be. Those in poor areas dealing with the lower socioeconomic class will be equivalent or worse than the public schools. There are success stories...a couple of places with big outside support are doing OK with a lower end clientele and a few charters are doing very well - of course they are in higher socioeconomics areas and have low ELL and FRL.

So if you wish to pay for private schools for the well off vouchers and charters work fine. If you wish to help the lower classes they won't do a thing.

As to why public schools it is clear the US has always seen an educated citizenry a societal need. We therefore provide it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2017, 02:31 PM
 
Location: Colorado Springs
4,944 posts, read 2,943,391 times
Reputation: 3805
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
Having been watching the voucher/charter schools here it is reasonably clear what the outcome will be. Those in poor areas dealing with the lower socioeconomic class will be equivalent or worse than the public schools. There are success stories...a couple of places with big outside support are doing OK with a lower end clientele and a few charters are doing very well - of course they are in higher socioeconomics areas and have low ELL and FRL.

So if you wish to pay for private schools for the well off vouchers and charters work fine. If you wish to help the lower classes they won't do a thing.

As to why public schools it is clear the US has always seen an educated citizenry a societal need. We therefore provide it.
Pretty much the end goal of right wing ideology is a nation like Brazil. A small elite and a massive underclass. A middle class can only exist if the rich decide that public services like schools and roads are important. A society that values greed will inevitably end up with less since they don't invest in the people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2017, 02:37 PM
 
12,883 posts, read 13,999,463 times
Reputation: 18452
I don't feel wealthy people OWE anyone anything but I do think that extremely wealthy people should donate to charities or set some up themselves to benefit impoverished or less fortunate people. I would if I were a Bill Gates or a Kardashian or something. I think it's the right thing to do to voluntarily give, but I don't think people are owed anything.

There are a lot of people out there who have far more money than they will ever reasonably spend. I think using some of it to help others is morally right. They're not obligated to, but while they have a right to decide that, I also have a right to think they're being selfish.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2017, 02:53 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,360,489 times
Reputation: 8828
This all actually pretty silly. What the rich pay is up to the rest of us. We can collect whatever we chose to and there is little the well off can do other than perhaps leave. But if their source of wealth is in the US, a very likely fact, that does little good.

So it is our sense of fairness that protects the wealthy. And of course the well off can lobby and try and influence the population. But if the populist machine begins to roll hard they get cut right down. And we always have the possibility of going to VAT or such. And I suppose you could do a Cadillac VAT...only on items costing more than say $10,000.

And messing with the system is tricky. The present Republican proposal has all sorts of interesting ramifications. They are for instance proposing to punish TX and Illinois as well as CA and NY. Basically if you kill the tax deductibility of state taxes you really sock it to places like IL and TX where property taxes are very high. Be great for NV where we have no income tax and relatively low property taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2017, 03:27 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,748,463 times
Reputation: 14745
I think we need to replace federal income taxes with a federal tax on land.

Easy to hide paper wealth and income. Not so easy to hide land.

It would also discourage people from buying up houses as investments, and it would lower the price of land and enable lower income people to buy. Win win. Only losers are the plutocrats and landed aristocracy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2017, 03:36 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,795,791 times
Reputation: 6663
Quote:
Originally Posted by bingo3000 View Post
Should wealthy Americans--wealthy businesspeople, doctors, scientists, high paid professors, high paid journalists and radio hosts, athletes, sports owners, etc. owe the 99 percent of Americans something?
NO!

The top 20% pay 84% of the taxes. 51% of people don't pay any FED taxes at all.

I'm in that group, and even though I pay a bungload of state taxes, sales taxes, utility taxes, and SS...etc. the top 20% are paying the lions share as it is. THEY (the wealthy) live portable lives. If they become over taxed, they move. That is as big a problem as the jobs being moved overseas.

People without money are the only ones stuck in their situation, and expecting handouts isn't the answer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
I think we need to replace federal income taxes with a federal tax on land.

Easy to hide paper wealth and income. Not so easy to hide land.

It would also discourage people from buying up houses as investments, and it would lower the price of land and enable lower income people to buy. Win win. Only losers are the plutocrats and landed aristocracy.
So, your solution is to not only kill the economy, but make everyone equally poor. God I love socialists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2017, 03:51 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
Having been watching the voucher/charter schools here it is reasonably clear what the outcome will be. Those in poor areas dealing with the lower socioeconomic class will be equivalent or worse than the public schools. There are success stories...a couple of places with big outside support are doing OK with a lower end clientele and a few charters are doing very well - of course they are in higher socioeconomics areas and have low ELL and FRL.

So if you wish to pay for private schools for the well off vouchers and charters work fine. If you wish to help the lower classes they won't do a thing.
False, and the Washington, DC voucher program proves it. The kids who were able to get out of the DC public schools to attend private schools did better than those trapped behind.

Quote:
As to why public schools it is clear the US has always seen an educated citizenry a societal need. We therefore provide it.
If only US public schools actually educated most students. They don't. Not even Asians and Whites, who are supposedly at an advantage. Read and learn:

Percent of 12th grade students of each race/ethnicity who are proficient or above:

Mathematics:

Overall: 26%

Asian/Pacific Islander: 47%
White: 33%
American Indian/Alaska Native: 12%
Hispanic: 12%
Black: 7%

Reading:

Overall: 38%


Asian/Pacific Islander: 47%
White: 47%
American Indian/Alaska Native: 26%
Hispanic: 23%
Black: 16%

National Assessment of Educational Progress - NAEP - 12th Grade Mathematics and Reading
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2017, 04:10 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,631,426 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
This all actually pretty silly. What the rich pay is up to the rest of us. We can collect whatever we chose to and there is little the well off can do other than perhaps leave. But if their source of wealth is in the US, a very likely fact, that does little good.

So it is our sense of fairness that protects the wealthy. And of course the well off can lobby and try and influence the population. But if the populist machine begins to roll hard they get cut right down. And we always have the possibility of going to VAT or such. And I suppose you could do a Cadillac VAT...only on items costing more than say $10,000.

And messing with the system is tricky. The present Republican proposal has all sorts of interesting ramifications. They are for instance proposing to punish TX and Illinois as well as CA and NY. Basically if you kill the tax deductibility of state taxes you really sock it to places like IL and TX where property taxes are very high. Be great for NV where we have no income tax and relatively low property taxes.
So, the majority should rule and take what they want.

The majority of the country was for enslavement of others at one point. I guess that was moral and good since it was what the majority decided, right?

I guess you feel what the majority of Germans did to the Jews, gypsies and homosexuals was just since the majority went along with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top