Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
All you who think the despot in North Korea has your best interests at heart, ................
Stopped reading there since that applies to No One here............the rest was just your rant against something that does not exist and which more of a critic on yourself than those imaginary enemies you are attacking. Stay out of The Netherlands, far too many Windmills....
From the Comments...The left freaked out because they still don't understand that the Obama "bend over and grab your ankles" school of diplomacy doesn't work
All I can say is that when the goofball in North Korea starts lobbing nukes all over the place the liberal crybabies will be screaming that Donald Trump should've done something sooner.
As for now, what can you do? We've tried sanctions and diplomacy, and Kim won't back off. The left seems to be content with letting Kim fire the first bullet, and any of the liberals that side with that nutcase ought to go join him in his version of utopia. My guess is the liberals would last about 10 minutes over there before they're running home to momma.
All I can say is that when the goofball in North Korea starts lobbing nukes all over the place the liberal crybabies will be screaming that Donald Trump should've done something sooner.
As for now, what can you do? We've tried sanctions and diplomacy, and Kim won't back off. The left seems to be content with letting Kim fire the first bullet, and any of the liberals that side with that nutcase ought to go join him in his version of utopia. My guess is the liberals would last about 10 minutes over there before they're running home to momma.
And your answer is start lobbing nukes all over the place? Brilliant
Actually now that China is coming around it looks like they may very well have an impact on NK. One uss Diplomacy Before they start wars, too deep for you? Your guess, with the rest is wrong, there are plenty of Liberals that have and are serving in Korea today, ever done duty there yourself?
"This is classic conservative internationalism: a vigorous defense of freedom, a bold challenge to dangerous dictators and a commitment to the principle of peace through strength. No wonder Trump’s critics on the left are so upset."
What a buncha RWNJ nonsense.
tRump speaks like a blustering bozo in front of the UN and his followers hoot and holler in response.
"This is classic conservative internationalism: a vigorous defense of freedom, a bold challenge to dangerous dictators and a commitment to the principle of peace through strength. No wonder Trump’s critics on the left are so upset."
What a buncha RWNJ nonsense.
tRump speaks like a blustering bozo in front of the UN and his followers hoot and holler in response.
Obviously Faux Noise believes "the left" is doing whatever Faux Noise says it is doing. Why spend the time, effort and MONEY to do the research to find out what "the left" is actually thinking and doing.
I am a ardent leftist and my preferred solution to the problem with North Korea's nuclear bombast is to tell China that threatening madman is closer to China than to the US. and that the Korean's hate the Chinese even more then they hate the US. Then the Chinese army may take preemptive action against the obvious threat to China.
The most important consideration in this situation is weather The Donald owns any property or has a prospective real estate deals within range of the Korean missiles. War is less likely if The Donald's property will not be destroyed in a Korean strike. Whatever does happen, besides both sides regaining their senses, will not end well.
what amazes me is that the left is agreeing with kim that trump is a deranged dotard, and yet kim is the one that wants to detonate a nuclear warhead in the pacific, so lefties, tell ma again who the deranged person is here?
yes two wars were started under bush, but it was obama that pulled us out of iraq leaving us to have to go back in and help the iraqis finish the job, instead of making a deal with the iraqi government to leave US troops there to finish the job.
and obama was doing the same thing in afghanistan as well. so you can blame bush for getting us into the wars, but you can blame obama for pulling out before the job was done.
RUBBISH MADE UP BUNK.
Obama had zero choice he legally HAD TO LEAVE due to Bush's signing a deal with Iraq.
Obama had no choice due to BUSH making a mistake. so let's be clear here Rbohm. YOU ARE WRONG.
Your statement is false , maybe not intentional but false all the same.
GEORGE BUSH SIGNED A DEAL LEGALLY BINDING THE USA TO LEAVE IRAQ. look it up dude.
as to afghanistan... hmm did Obama leave ? NO thus what are you talking about Obama never left
Karzai refused to sign a security agreement and left Obama no choice but to scale back .
Frankly if you have a solution to afghanistan let us know, because Trump promised to end it and is not and appears to have no answers either. it is not like either the left or right has a plan that they are hiding or would have hidden any time in the last decade.
Bush got us in and like every nation before us, there is no way to win, and no way to leave and look like you did. Instead the best we can hope for is pakistan deciding they want to become a true country of real law and real order.
That old observation seems to be just as appropriate for the US as it was for Alexander the Great and the Soviet Union.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.