Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,619,501 times
Reputation: 9169
Advertisements
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy
Do you realize how many crimes are prosecuted without physical or corroborating evidence? Most domestic violence arrests are made based on the statements of the victim. Rape cases are frequently prosecuted without physical evidence or witnesses, same with child molestation cases. From everything I've read there were no witnesses to the assault on Rand Paul by his neighbor, so should we refuse to believe his account of the incident until "the evidence comes out"
Why not just admit that there is nothing a fellow conservative can do that would cause you to criticize them?
Exactly, the West Memphis Three were convicted of murder with no witnesses and no evidence, and spent over 20 years in prison before having to plead no contest to be released
The fact really hurt you don't they? Innocent until proven guilty, does that really go over your head? what don't you understand about it? If you have proof he is guilty feel free to post it.
Venn diagram: people who vehemently rejected the idea of "rape culture" and people who now talk about "Hollywood elites" all being a bunch of pedophiles and rapists.
Also, before making this a left/right issue, remember the thread topic.
Last night, instead of coming out and making a public denial, Moore went into hiding and released some cowardly statement about "fake news."
If this slob has anything resembling courage and is truly innocent of these allegations, he'll come out early today with a public appearance and detail his defense of his innocence.
Or, he'll just deflect and blame it all on the Bible.
After all, it says what he did wasn't wrong at all, according to the GOP machine in Bama.
How convenient for you to claim you didn't know what they said, then a few minutes later post what you think they said
"Wendy Miller says she was 14 and working as a Santa’s helper at the Gadsden Mall when Moore first approached her, and 16 when he asked her on dates, which her mother forbade. Debbie Wesson Gibson says she was 17 when Moore spoke to her high school civics class and asked her out on the first of several dates that did not progress beyond kissing. Gloria Thacker Deason says she was an 18-year-old cheerleader when Moore began taking her on dates that included bottles of Mateus Rosé wine. The legal drinking age in Alabama was 19. Of the four women, the youngest at the time was Corfman, who is the only one who says she had sexual contact with Moore that went beyond kissing. She says they did not have intercourse."
Were they sexually assaulted, no. Does it show that Mr. Moore has a pedophilia problem? yes and if this case had not reached the statute of limitations those other witness statements would probably have been enough for a jury to find him guilty of sexual assault of the 14 year old
So, there is only ONE accusation of something illegal. Was that so hard to admit?
Now, what exactly are the witness statements?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.